donner dagger fur hire and fur hire (yu-gi-oh!) created by lp6gpk5i8o9z7cs
Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • Aww yeah, ya'll ready fur hires to be tier 1 again since duel links? :copium:

    Edit: IT ACTUALLY TOPPED A YCS!? lmao. Thank you prometheus.

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • 6
  • benjiboyo said:
    Aww yeah, ya'll ready fur hires to be tier 1 again since duel links? :copium:

    Unfortunately Spright get Sprind in the same set, and that's not even mentioning Ishizu Tearlaments, or Kshatri-La.

    Looking forward to an increasingly toxic format. At least mine is getting banned this time, right Konami?

    I really miss the pre-POTE format.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • rusticghost said:
    Unfortunately Spright get Sprind in the same set, and that's not even mentioning Ishizu Tearlaments, or Kshatri-La.

    Looking forward to an increasingly toxic format. At least mine is getting banned this time, right Konami?

    I really miss the pre-POTE format.

    Well MD is still pre POTE... But for how long is the question, enjoy it while you can i suppose. Unless you're one of those people who hates maxx c over mine.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • rusticghost said:
    Unfortunately Spright get Sprind in the same set, and that's not even mentioning Ishizu Tearlaments, or Kshatri-La.

    Looking forward to an increasingly toxic format. At least mine is getting banned this time, right Konami?

    I really miss the pre-POTE format.

    Mine getting banned, nice joke there.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • benjiboyo said:
    Aww yeah, ya'll ready fur hires to be tier 1 again since duel links? :copium:

    Edit: IT ACTUALLY TOPPED A YCS!? lmao. Thank you prometheus.

    don't personally consider fur hire topping since it was mostly Runick/Sprights in that deck lol

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • luigifan45 said:
    don't personally consider fur hire topping since it was mostly Runick/Sprights in that deck lol

    I mean sure, but at least seeing it used as an engine at all is still something... Still better than kash or tears

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0