Viewing sample resized to 44% of original (view original) Loading...
Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • bing_bong_horny said:
    this is just disgusting, if you think a normal non anthro animal like this is hot there is something wrong with you. i dont care if one million zoos downvote me, you guys are filth

    Use your blacklist

  • Reply
  • |
  • 103
  • bing_bong_horny said:
    this is just disgusting, if you think a normal non anthro animal like this is hot there is something wrong with you. i dont care if one million zoos downvote me, you guys are filth

    guess what, if you think any furry/anthro character is hot, 99% of the world's population think that there's something wrong with you aswell.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 66
  • bing_bong_horny said:
    this is just disgusting, if you think a normal non anthro animal like this is hot there is something wrong with you. i dont care if one million zoos downvote me, you guys are filth

    So an image can have a character that has animal ears, paws, claws, fur, sharp teeth and a tail but if they are four-legged it's too far? You even have an animation in your favourites of a FERAL Arcanine which is basically a normal dog with fancy colours and lots of fur.

    Get off your soap-box mate, you look like a huge hypocrite.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 58
  • bing_bong_horny said:
    this is just disgusting, if you think a normal non anthro animal like this is hot there is something wrong with you. i dont care if one million zoos downvote me, you guys are filth

    Okay you hypocritical basturd maybe you should learn how to use your blacklist No one honestly cares about you or your pathetic comment so why don’t you go back to twitter where you belong like the toxic person you are it’s not beastiality or zoo if it’s animation you dumb fuck

  • Reply
  • |
  • 22
  • bing_bong_horny said:
    this is just disgusting, if you think a normal non anthro animal like this is hot there is something wrong with you. i dont care if one million zoos downvote me, you guys are filth

    Here comes the cringelords moralizing about an imaginary CGI depiction of bestiality on a furry imageboard.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 14
  • and I'm here looking at the old post and out of nowhere I come across a new one the night is going to be good here.
    one hour they will know who this person and I will participate in the paid groups if there is.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • bing_bong_horny said:
    this is just disgusting, if you think a normal non anthro animal like this is hot there is something wrong with you. i dont care if one million zoos downvote me, you guys are filth

    Settle down mister horny. We all can see past your insuferable denial.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 10
  • skoolby said:

    I hate that this is getting downvoted. Being a furry is one thing but this is fucked :(

    Then they should've blacklisted instead of bitching about it.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 17
  • bing_bong_horny said:
    this is just disgusting, if you think a normal non anthro animal like this is hot there is something wrong with you. i dont care if one million zoos downvote me, you guys are filth

    well this isnt normal. shes way too big.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -6
  • bing_bong_horny said:
    this is just disgusting, if you think a normal non anthro animal like this is hot there is something wrong with you. i dont care if one million zoos downvote me, you guys are filth

    You have bestiality in your favorites though.
    https://e621.net/posts?tags=fav%3Abing_bong_horny+bestiality

    skoolby said:

    I hate that this is getting downvoted. Being a furry is one thing but this is fucked :(

    You do as well? Why's there so much hypocrisy in these comments?
    https://e621.net/favorites?user_id=344546

  • Reply
  • |
  • 13
  • crimzonwolf666 said:
    So an image can have a character that has animal ears, paws, claws, fur, sharp teeth and a tail but if they are four-legged it's too far? You even have an animation in your favourites of a FERAL Arcanine which is basically a normal dog with fancy colours and lots of fur.

    Get off your soap-box mate, you look like a huge hypocrite.

    Watch them use the "oh but pokemon are sentient" excuse, even though that applys to the animals in these animations almost 96% of the time

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • crimzonwolf666 said:
    So an image can have a character that has animal ears, paws, claws, fur, sharp teeth and a tail but if they are four-legged it's too far? You even have an animation in your favourites of a FERAL Arcanine which is basically a normal dog with fancy colours and lots of fur.

    Get off your soap-box mate, you look like a huge hypocrite.

    They are two-legged but ok

  • Reply
  • |
  • -4
  • crimzonwolf666 said:
    So an image can have a character that has animal ears, paws, claws, fur, sharp teeth and a tail but if they are four-legged it's too far? You even have an animation in your favourites of a FERAL Arcanine which is basically a normal dog with fancy colours and lots of fur.

    Get off your soap-box mate, you look like a huge hypocrite.

    To respond to your first question, it would be too far since it's humanoid on two legs. Also Pokémon are intelligent and are able to consent while the dog here shows no evidence of that.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • vinstual said:
    Did that help? No. Did you change something? No. Would it be better if we took all the artworks that are just like this off the internet? ABSOLUTELY NOT!! simple question: where are people gonna go/what aee they gonna do when you take this away from them?.... Right, they do it to actual animals. You dont think clearly when faced with serious topics like this and that makes you unworthy of calling them filth. Going through like with "I dont care if" is pathetic and worthy of suicide.

    Bro it's fine if you disagree with someone but telling them to kill themselves is messed up.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 6
  • eggdocc said:
    Oh fuck yeah, the sexiest dog breed. Need me a saint bernard like this

    Trust me, you wouldn’t regret it~

    Updated by spe


    User was banned for the contents of this message.
  • Reply
  • |
  • -5