loimu and red-eyed buck created by loimu
Viewing sample resized to 32% of original (view original) Loading...
  • Comments
  • Now the question... would you call this rape as the male had no intention of risking a child or even having sex. Yet the female forcibly inseminated herself with the male having little to know say in breeding. In otherwords, imagine if you were a guy with no desire to have a kid(s), and yet this girl uncosentually uses your sperm to impregnate herself. And now your the father of a kid you never wanted or even risked having. Because of a females action. No easy answer

  • Reply
  • |
  • 53
  • blaze21 said:
    Now the question... would you call this rape as the male had no intention of risking a child or even having sex. Yet the female forcibly inseminated herself with the male having little to know say in breeding. In otherwords, imagine if you were a guy with no desire to have a kid(s), and yet this girl uncosentually uses your sperm to impregnate herself. And now your the father of a kid you never wanted or even risked having. Because of a females action. No easy answer

    For the sake of a possible new tag this should technically be labeled as "reproductive coercion" which according to wikipedia "is a collection of behaviors that interfere with decision-making related to reproductive health" those behaviors include "pregnancy coercion", "birth-control sabotage", and "controlling the out-come of the pregnancy" which falls under the umbrella for rape. It is wikipedia so take it with a grain of salt but yeah it makes sense. I wouldn't describe it as rape probably more like assault but I am not a lawyer. Here's the link if you want to know more.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reproductive_coercion

    As I said if people want a tag for something like this that they wish to blacklist "reproductive coercion" or "pregnancy coercion" would make for suitable tags.

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • 33
  • weaselsmasher said:
    Shut up and fap.

    Hey now, no need to be a dick. Pardon my phrasing :p It is a fair question as a lot of people may not be into portrayals of non-consenting stuff regardless if it's 100% fictional. They weren't being rude so bugger off.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 25
  • queerbrony69 said:
    For the sake of a possible new tag this should technically be labeled as "reproductive coercion" which according to wikipedia "is a collection of behaviors that interfere with decision-making related to reproductive health" those behaviors include "pregnancy coercion", "birth-control sabotage", and "controlling the out-come of the pregnancy" which falls under the umbrella for rape. It is wikipedia so take it with a grain of salt but yeah it makes sense. I wouldn't describe it as rape probably more like assault but I am not a lawyer. Here's the link if you want to know more.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reproductive_coercion

    As I said if people want a tag for something like this that they wish to blacklist "reproductive coercion" or "pregnancy coercion" would make for suitable tags.

    I believe I've read it somewhere under the slang term "spermjacking", and that apparently it was still one-hell of a gray-zone in some countries, to the point the "father" is still required to pay alimony. If someone wants to correct me he's welcome, I haven't really delved too deep into the subjet.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 7
  • I mean, I don't think the sperm will be fertilizing anything. I just don't think any of them could get far enough without it being pushed all the way in. So he really has nothing to worry about!

  • Reply
  • |
  • -4
  • xakender said:
    I mean, I don't think the sperm will be fertilizing anything. I just don't think any of them could get far enough without it being pushed all the way in. So he really has nothing to worry about!

    I'm sorry to tell you that you're very wrong! Sperm are called swimmers for a reason! They're designed to move, and move fast. Someone once got pregnant from anal- how, you might ask? Because when the, uh, baby batter leaked out, it went down. Didn't even have to go *in*.

    Source: I'm training to be a medical student.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 6
  • hand_machine_gun said:
    He's horncerned. (Yeah, I know the way out...)

    It's the definite feeling of not wanting to be a dad so soon but also the satisfaction of seeing a woman actively impregnate herself with your seed there's a primal satisfaction of that.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • blaze21 said:
    Now the question... would you call this rape as the male had no intention of risking a child or even having sex. Yet the female forcibly inseminated herself with the male having little to know say in breeding. In otherwords, imagine if you were a guy with no desire to have a kid(s), and yet this girl uncosentually uses your sperm to impregnate herself. And now your the father of a kid you never wanted or even risked having. Because of a females action. No easy answer

    Maybe forced impregnation but that usually implies there's someone else forcing her to be pregos

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • blaze21 said:
    Now the question... would you call this rape as the male had no intention of risking a child or even having sex. Yet the female forcibly inseminated herself with the male having little to know say in breeding. In otherwords, imagine if you were a guy with no desire to have a kid(s), and yet this girl uncosentually uses your sperm to impregnate herself. And now your the father of a kid you never wanted or even risked having. Because of a females action. No easy answer.

    Maybe but it's really hard to prove it (this is why non penetrative sexual assault is way harder to punish than straight up unwanted sex with cum inside).

    nero_the_red said:
    I believe I've read it somewhere under the slang term "spermjacking", and that apparently it was still one-hell of a gray-zone in some countries, to the point the "father" is still required to pay alimony. If someone wants to correct me he's welcome, I haven't really delved too deep into the subjet.

    The name is funny but yeah it sucks to pay for a kid from a woman you never had sex with.

    This is why you need to properly dispose of the condom or even better not do any frisky things with red flagged people.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Queerbrony69 said:

    blaze21 said:
    Now the question... would you call this rape as the male had no intention of risking a child or even having sex. Yet the female forcibly inseminated herself with the male having little to know say in breeding. In otherwords, imagine if you were a guy with no desire to have a kid(s), and yet this girl uncosentually uses your sperm to impregnate herself. And now your the father of a kid you never wanted or even risked having. Because of a females action. No easy answer

    For the sake of a possible new tag this should technically be labeled as "reproductive coercion" which according to wikipedia "is a collection of behaviors that interfere with decision-making related to reproductive health" those behaviors include "pregnancy coercion", "birth-control sabotage", and "controlling the out-come of the pregnancy" which falls under the umbrella for rape. It is wikipedia so take it with a grain of salt but yeah it makes sense. I wouldn't describe it as rape probably more like assault but I am not a lawyer. Here's the link if you want to know more.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reproductive_coercion

    As I said if people want a tag for something like this that they wish to blacklist "reproductive coercion" or "pregnancy coercion" would make for suitable tags.

    Most definitely rape.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • blaze21 said:
    Now the question... would you call this rape as the male had no intention of risking a child or even having sex. Yet the female forcibly inseminated herself with the male having little to know say in breeding. In otherwords, imagine if you were a guy with no desire to have a kid(s), and yet this girl uncosentually uses your sperm to impregnate herself. And now your the father of a kid you never wanted or even risked having. Because of a females action. No easy answer

    2 easy answers.
    A vasectomy is a magical thing.

    If you don’t want kids, don’t cum.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • blaze21 said:
    Now the question... would you call this rape as the male had no intention of risking a child or even having sex. Yet the female forcibly inseminated herself with the male having little to know say in breeding. In otherwords, imagine if you were a guy with no desire to have a kid(s), and yet this girl uncosentually uses your sperm to impregnate herself. And now your the father of a kid you never wanted or even risked having. Because of a females action. No easy answer

    This is porn dude.
    I get there are male victims of that too, but stop overthinking

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2