Probably shouldn't post this in case the tag alias nazis decide "anthro" is an invalid_tag too.

das rechte nennt sich yiffi aber psst XD ^^

darkestspirit said:
das rechte nennt sich yiffi aber psst XD ^^

Sobaka na sobaka?

Lol. Bear. xD

What's doubly hilarious is that the coloring is actually less garish on the porn than the "official" art.

Ich haba ein schmetterling auf mien gesass.

Kan said:
I dont know whether to be offended or amused by this OBVIOUS attempt at trolling :3

How is this trolling?
It's 100% true.

Kan said:
your mother said it was.

I don't know whether to be offended or amused by this <strong>obvious</strong> attempt at trolling :3

Any time.

Honestly I think it's funny there are no posts by 'Kan" But quotes and that Chaosye quoted what was said by Anonym after his post

Anonym said:
this is what I'm talking about, edited quote.

COOL NERD SEMANTICS I LOVE THOSE

I have a question for my fellow homosexuals. What does that actually taste like. Everybody guesses that it would taste aweful; however, I have heard from some people that it actually tastes sweet. Any answers?

darthnihilus said:
I have a question for my fellow homosexuals. What does that actually taste like. Everybody guesses that it would taste aweful; however, I have heard from some people that it actually tastes sweet. Any answers?

Well it all depends on one thing. If its CLEAN or not.

lol, exactly, a clean bum is a tastey bum

darthnihilus said:
I have a question for my fellow homosexuals. What does that actually taste like.

you say that like guys don't ever rim girls or vice versa. :P

if it's clean, it's fine.

Fox97 said:
lol, exactly, a clean bum is a tastey bum

And this is where this conversation took a turn for the worst.

Also, how deep is his mouth, because.. his nose is really in there..

vincent said:
Honestly I think it's funny there are no posts by 'Kan" But quotes and that Chaosye quoted what was said by Anonym after his post

He got embarrassed and deleted everything. Either that or the admins deleted it.

Raptorwolf0924 said:
And this is where this conversation took a turn for the worst.

Also, how deep is his mouth, because.. his nose is really in there..

Agreed. Also, 3-4 inches.

Raptorwolf0924 said:
how deep is his mouth, because.. his nose is really in there..

asdfzxc said:
3-4 inches.

yes indeed...certainly looks like he's muzzlefucking his ass.

darthnihilus said:
I have a question for my fellow homosexuals. What does that actually taste like. Everybody guesses that it would taste aweful; however, I have heard from some people that it actually tastes sweet. Any answers?

I'm not homosexual but I have pleasure my boy and I would say it being clean a slight sweetish/salty taste, I dunno, my tastebuds might be odd

Kubari said:
Well it all depends on one thing. If its CLEAN or not.

so your not confused I am female, and boy refering to fiance

More like, "What Disney had in Mind" and "The Actual Result of showing It to Children".

I say, sir. May I kill you for posting this picture?

How about I take both?

Lol. Troll-tards. You gotta love 'em.

Anthropomporphism:
Giving any non human object or creature human characteristics. Making a sack of flour walk and show emotion through body language, which is sometimes a test for new animators, is "Anthro" by defenition. "The brave little toaster" is an Anthro character and so is bugs bunny.

Furry:
Art or activity spesificly ment to cater towards a particular sub-culture that involves anthropomorphic animal characters... most often pornographic. Such as Bugs Bunny getting fucked up the ass.

All furry art is anthro, but not all anthro art is furry. Anyone that says both Anthro characters and furry are the same thing and that robin hood is a "furry movie" is just like those assholes that think communism, socialism, and fascism are the same thing.

SO LEARN PROPER DEFENITIONS AND MEANINGS OF WORDS OR STOP USING MY LANGUAGE.

Nobody said:
Anthropomporphism:
Giving any non human object or creature human characteristics. Making a sack of flour walk and show emotion through body language, which is sometimes a test for new animators, is "Anthro" by defenition. "The brave little toaster" is an Anthro character and so is bugs bunny.

Furry:
Art or activity spesificly ment to cater towards a particular sub-culture that involves anthropomorphic animal characters... most often pornographic. Such as Bugs Bunny getting fucked up the ass.

All furry art is anthro, but not all anthro art is furry. Anyone that says both Anthro characters and furry are the same thing and that robin hood is a "furry movie" is just like those assholes that think communism, socialism, and fascism are the same thing.

SO LEARN PROPER DEFENITIONS AND MEANINGS OF WORDS OR STOP USING MY LANGUAGE.

Nobody cares.

Nobody said:

SO LEARN PROPER DEFENITIONS AND MEANINGS OF WORDS OR STOP USING MY LANGUAGE.

Your language died 10 years ago. Language evolves.

Nobody said:
Anthropomporphism:
Giving any non human object or creature human characteristics. Making a sack of flour walk and show emotion through body language, which is sometimes a test for new animators, is "Anthro" by defenition. "The brave little toaster" is an Anthro character and so is bugs bunny.

Furry:
Art or activity spesificly ment to cater towards a particular sub-culture that involves anthropomorphic animal characters... most often pornographic. Such as Bugs Bunny getting fucked up the ass.

All furry art is anthro, but not all anthro art is furry. Anyone that says both Anthro characters and furry are the same thing and that robin hood is a "furry movie" is just like those assholes that think communism, socialism, and fascism are the same thing.

SO LEARN PROPER DEFENITIONS AND MEANINGS OF WORDS OR STOP USING MY LANGUAGE.

cool story bro

darthnihilus said:
I have a question for my fellow homosexuals. What does that actually taste like. Everybody guesses that it would taste aweful; however, I have heard from some people that it actually tastes sweet. Any answers?

Renard said:
you say that like guys don't ever rim girls or vice versa. :P

if it's clean, it's fine.

It tastes the same as a dick, under the right, erm, circumstances. And yes girls and guys can do it, but seriously? If I was straight and had the choice of licking either an ass or... the other one, I'd probably choose the other one, simply because that's the most obvious choice.

Liquid_Chameleon said:
What's doubly hilarious is that the coloring is actually less garish on the porn than the "official" art.

The official "art" is a recoloring/shading of the original art, which was loads better before they decided to "improve" it.

Nobody said:
Anthropomporphism:
Giving any non human object or creature human characteristics. Making a sack of flour walk and show emotion through body language, which is sometimes a test for new animators, is "Anthro" by defenition. "The brave little toaster" is an Anthro character and so is bugs bunny.

Furry:
Art or activity spesificly ment to cater towards a particular sub-culture that involves anthropomorphic animal characters... most often pornographic. Such as Bugs Bunny getting fucked up the ass.

All furry art is anthro, but not all anthro art is furry. Anyone that says both Anthro characters and furry are the same thing and that robin hood is a "furry movie" is just like those assholes that think communism, socialism, and fascism are the same thing.

SO LEARN PROPER DEFENITIONS AND MEANINGS OF WORDS OR STOP USING MY LANGUAGE.

i have to agree it makes sence what you say dude it really dose. and also the only reasion every one says robin hood is a furry movie is because ever single charactor in the movie ither a furry or an anthro of some way shape or form.

soraya said:
The official "art" is a recoloring/shading of the original art, which was loads better before they decided to "improve" it.

i agree with all 3 of you. the original art was way way way better befor they turned robin and little john into gays

darkestspirit said:
das rechte nennt sich yiffi aber psst XD ^^

Der_Fuchs said:
Das mag ja sein, aber die meisten hier wissen mit deutsch wohl nich viel anzufangen... XDD

das mag ja sein, aber manche doch...
Sorry konnte nich widerstehen XDD
[/quote]

Love how this started an argument about what 'furry' is. Love that there is a very, VERY, good chance that the person that made this faps to furry smut and loves it.

The whole "Furries are so gross/perverse and rape everything" mentality; pretending to disown the fandom while BEING a said "perverse furry" at the same time is fucktarted. Get over yourselves! There is a shit-ton of smut but nobody is forcing you to look at it! There is a clean, fun, creative, artsy side of this still and trying to say there isn't is doing more damage than the porn overload.

Ohh and wtf is up with the German? o.0

I thought the picture on the left would be anthro/furry (being anthropomorphic animal characters), while the picture on the right would be classifies as "furry porn" (or "yiff")?

Pff anthro artists get off your goddamn high horse

C'est insensé.
Les deux sont anthropomorphisés. Donc les deux sont des "anthro".
Anthro de anthropomorphique, signifie: de forme humaine.
Les deux images ont montrées que les personnages sont anthropomorphiques.
Furry, c'est juste un genre que vous vous donnez.
Mais c'est futil, est sans importance.
L'important c'est que ces créatures, soient belle, et pourraient exister un jour, grace à la robotique.
Au contraire, le mouvement "Furry", rend la chose moins crédible.
De plus, le therme "Furry", est très mal choisi.
Car à l'origine, ces créatures s'appellent des demi-bêtes.
Que vous vous en foutiez, peu importe. Car la vérité,c'est ce que je viens de dire.
Alors que le therme "Furry", s'apparente uniquement aux créatures à fourrures.
Alors que pourtant, il y a les autres... Il y a aussi les "Scalie", "Avian", "Amphibian".
Donc, pour cette raison, le terme «demi-bête» est mieux.
Et non "Fur" (qui est trop spécifique et trop fasciste pour les autres espèces).

This is nonsense.
Both are anthropomorphic. Therefore both are "anthro".
Anthro, anthropomorphic who just wants to mean: human form (regardless of the degree, whether total or partial).
Both images have shown that the characters are anthropomorphic.
As for "Furry", it's just a kind that you give yourself.
But it is Futil, is irrelevant.
The important thing is that these creatures are beautiful, and could exist one day, thanks to robotics.
On the contrary, the movement "Furry" makes the least believable thing.
Moreover, the term "Furry" is poorly chosen.
Because originally, these creatures are called half-beasts.
That you do not care, whatever. Because the truth is what I just said.
In addition the term "half-beast" is better because it can encompass all races, without specifying whether he has fur or scales, feathers, etc ...
While the term "Furry" is only apparent to creatures with fur.
But there are other ... There is also the "Scalie", "Avian", "Amphibian".
So for this reason, the term "half-beast" is better.
And not "Furry" (that is too specific and too fascist for the other species).

Crokey said:
C'est insensé.
Les deux sont anthropomorphisés. Donc les deux sont des "anthro".
Anthro de anthropomorphique, signifie: de forme humaine.
Les deux images ont montrées que les personnages sont anthropomorphiques.
Furry, c'est juste un genre que vous vous donnez.
Mais c'est futil, est sans importance.
L'important c'est que ces créatures, soient belle, et pourraient exister un jour, grace à la robotique.
Au contraire, le mouvement "Furry", rend la chose moins crédible.
De plus, le therme "Furry", est très mal choisi.
Car à l'origine, ces créatures s'appellent des demi-bêtes.
Que vous vous en foutiez, peu importe. Car la vérité,c'est ce que je viens de dire.
Alors que le therme "Furry", s'apparente uniquement aux créatures à fourrures.
Alors que pourtant, il y a les autres... Il y a aussi les "Scalie", "Avian", "Amphibian".
Donc, pour cette raison, le terme «demi-bête» est mieux.
Et non "Fur" (qui est trop spécifique et trop fasciste pour les autres espèces).

This is nonsense.
Both are anthropomorphic. Therefore both are "anthro".
Anthro, anthropomorphic who just wants to mean: human form (regardless of the degree, whether total or partial).
Both images have shown that the characters are anthropomorphic.
As for "Furry", it's just a kind that you give yourself.
But it is Futil, is irrelevant.
The important thing is that these creatures are beautiful, and could exist one day, thanks to robotics.
On the contrary, the movement "Furry" makes the least believable thing.
Moreover, the term "Furry" is poorly chosen.
Because originally, these creatures are called half-beasts.
That you do not care, whatever. Because the truth is what I just said.
In addition the term "half-beast" is better because it can encompass all races, without specifying whether he has fur or scales, feathers, etc ...
While the term "Furry" is only apparent to creatures with fur.
But there are other ... There is also the "Scalie", "Avian", "Amphibian".
So for this reason, the term "half-beast" is better.
And not "Furry" (that is too specific and too fascist for the other species).

You mean Communist?

The difference is porn.