Jacob said:
Okay, Genjar. Here we have a feral Lopunny, as they appear in-game]
You've changed it how many times? Eight? ...that's worse than most tag wars I've seen. Wouldn't even have noticed if you hadn't admitted it, since I tag script obvious ones such as this one from the thumbnails.

Outside information is completely irrelevant to tagging forms, as is the possible lack of breasts. Feral lagomorphs are not bipedal, nor do they have humanoid torsos. Therefore this is clearly an anthro.

Go with anthro, don't tag by rules of lore. Thank you.

Jacob said:
Okay, Genjar. Here we have a feral Lopunny, as they appear in-game

Here we have an anthro Lopunny.

Notice how the only real difference is the presence-or lack-of actual titties? That means that unless you can see titties, you can't tag a Lopunny image as anthro, because you just can't be sure. STOP TAGGING IT.

There's no such thing as anthro males or flat-chested anthro females, got it.

Wasn't so much warring as going through my own tag history for mistakes I might have made, and changing back things I didn't feel were appropriate for people to have changed...but fine, whatever. The staff has spoke, so I shall abide by their word.

However, your auto-tagging from the thumbnail thing is clearly flawed, when you're using it to (on a different image) put the anthro tag on a picture of a human woman climbing into, or slipping out of (it's not clear which) a fursuit. A human wearing a Lucario fursuit is NOT an anthro Lucario. Maybe if the tag keeps getting removed, you need to actually CLICK the image, and take a look to see why, and only keep tagging it if it's actually appropriate.

Specifically, I occasionally go back through my tag history to see if new rule changes, or my own newly-gained knowledge of how the rules work (such as what I learned on this picture) make edits I made in the past no longer appropriate. When I see the plus or minus sign on an edit I made has turned black, I visit the image to see why. If the listed reason points out something I missed, or some rule change/new knowledge tells me the alteration was correct, I leave it alone. If, even with any changes to rules/my knowledge made since then, my initial edit still seems valid in my judgement, I change it back. Since nobody had bothered to point out to me the fact that creatures with human-like body shapes, even when they're feral, only get tagged feral if it's obvious (eg: They're facing toward the camera and lack titties/washboard chest, or human-like hands), that's why I kept removing the anthro tag from this one. Notice how after the staff actively told me I was wrong on my first strike, I stopped? That's because my changes aren't malicious, they aren't intended as tag warring. I'm perfectly willing to learn.

tl;dr: I might be kind of stubborn, but I'm not a dick. Just...send me mail telling me why I'm wrong, next time, and I'll stop. Promise.

... It's porn... yiff porn... Who the fuck cares what it's taged as... if you have an extra tag, you have an extra tag... just jerk it to the pic and move on...