You must be logged in to view this image. (learn more)

Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • Peekaboo said:
    Inb4 a billion peeps flagging this for invalid reasons.

    Avoided by adding a cub tag, I hope...

  • Reply
  • |
  • -5
  • Columben said:
    Would this be considered "under-age pornography"?

    If someone isn't born yet, is their age zero, or less than zero?
    Or is it one?
    METAL GEAR

  • Reply
  • |
  • 47
  • ʞɔnℲ said:
    Never thought I'd see someone turn this idea into an actual picture.

    Oh, there are many instances of this, many years old. It's actually nothing new.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 7
  • Ghost2 said:
    See, THIS is why posts with pregnant women bother me.

    That doesn't make any sense: What is depicted in this image obviously isn't "how it really is". This is just rank absurdity that happens to suit a fetish.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 9
  • FoxyRK9 said:
    This reminds of that Yahoo question where she asked if her baby would get pregnant too if she had sex.

    I remember the guys on Geek Juice talking about it long ago on episode 2 or 3. Although I think that at this point it's also been turned into a copypasta.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • i like how no one brings up anything about the lack of an amniotic sac. this woman should be in labor lol

  • Reply
  • |
  • 4
  • KishFox said:
    i like how no one brings up anything about the lack of an amniotic sac. this woman should be in labor lol

    What's the point in bringing up details of biology when it's already completely absurd?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 7
  • Foobaria said:
    What's the point in bringing up details of biology when it's already completely absurd?

    because it adds to the absurdity.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 8
  • KishFox said:
    i like how no one brings up anything about the lack of an amniotic sac. this woman should be in labor lol

    Cause the first thing people look for when browsing porn, is obviously accuracy and likeliness.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • SteelWings said:
    Why..... why would somebody draw this?

    Because they like it?

    TBonenom said:
    Does this count as double penetration...? x)

    It could be from a cretin perspective...

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • kokohusky said:
    I've seen it roleplayed, and now I've seen it drawn. The fuck is wrong with me xD

    If you haven't LARPed it, you have no room to question things.
    Get on my level.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
  • Furry4Hire said:
    Oh. Look. Another reason to hate Japanese porn. These are rare.

    Oh look. Another reason to add the tag "don't like don't look" on every pic.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • Tuskor13 said:
    Why is there no option to flag this for deletion under the reason of drawn underage shit? Like there's no pussyfooting around this, that is an unborn person engaging in relations, there's no way in FUCK that someone not even born is of legal age, what the shit?

    "Take everything outlet like this from pedophiles and make them rape a real child!" is all I hear.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 8