and this is why people hate furries and think we are all zoophiles

mary_the_furry said:
and this is why people hate furries and think we are all zoophiles

Okey I heard you and I respect your objections . If i see -20 dislikes I will delete it. I am not taking pleasure with messing with your site politics. I thought this grops allows 3d beastiality as well. As for future maybe you have to just ban all beastiality ( human / animal ) on your site to avoid all that commotion. Its your hobby ( I mean generally people like you) and you have right to keep it clean even if I dont like it. King Regards!

jollybizz said:
Okey I heard you and I respect your objections . If i see -20 dislikes I will delete it. I am not taking pleasure with messing with your site politics. I thought this grops allows 3d beastiality as well. As for future maybe you have to just ban all beastiality ( human / animal ) on your site to avoid all that commotion. Its your hobby ( I mean generally people like you) and you have right to keep it clean even if I dont like it. King Regards!

Honestly dont listen to that guy, hes no more the site owner than you and i are. Besides this is TAME compared to what this site has to offer. Not to mention there is always at least one commenter who shits on posts they forget to blacklist

mary_the_furry said:
and this is why people hate furries and think we are all zoophiles

You're in the wrong neighborhood.

I think the real issue is how low effort this is. The render has artifacts and an odd blur that makes it seem like you set the depth of field too close to the camera. There's only a single light. No bounce lighting or rim lights to make it interesting. Add a background too, and not the 144p texture backgrounds you have in your other posts. I can't tell if you made this in SFM or some other 3d program.

Clearly, you're new, but if you are actually interested in 3d, I suggest taking it seriously and watching some tutorials and improving before posting.

sneakybeeki said:
I think the real issue is how low effort this is. The render has artifacts and an odd blur that makes it seem like you set the depth of field too close to the camera. There's only a single light. No bounce lighting or rim lights to make it interesting. Add a background too, and not the 144p texture backgrounds you have in your other posts. I can't tell if you made this in SFM or some other 3d program.

Clearly, you're new, but if you are actually interested in 3d, I suggest taking it seriously and watching some tutorials and improving before posting.

Thank you for your criticism. No hard feelings. Mostly you are right, I was too hasty with publishing my works. As you corectly assume it was rather quick render ( but took some work anyway) . Funny thing that actually I used '3 point lightning' in this set. Anyway I dont agree that generally sigle light should be avoided. It depends at situation.
But those artifacts and blur you mention. Yep, definately my bad. I will correct this asap. ( Probably just do another render)

genex-tec said:
Can you tag properly? I don't wanna see this shit.

Sorry, not intentional mistake. I ve just corected it.