Fish pacifier

I guess gato keeping the fish alive by not letting it dry? 👀 Cute🧡

If that tatsugiri is real, is this vore???

Sprigatito is having breakfast I'm assuming. <3

Cat: slurp slurp slurp

Fish: 😐

orifan2 said:
If that tatsugiri is real, is this vore???

It has to get both inside the mouth and stay inside the mouth at minimum then it's soft_vore and in_mouth.

This isn't soft_vore let alone vore.

wolfmanfur said:
It has to get both inside the mouth and stay inside the mouth at minimum then it's soft_vore and in_mouth.

This isn't soft_vore let alone vore.

Uh, soft vore is the more popular as far as I know and it’s what most people mean when they just say vore. It’s usually hard vore that gets the distinction.

Tatsugiri's Commander
Sprigatito's stats increased! (?)

Awww
Also
Try to smole this! You can't!
*dies and goes to gay hell*

Don't give them ideas don't give them ideas DON'T GIVE THEM IDEAS DON'T GI

SUCC SUCC SUCC SUCC SUCC SUCC SUCC SUCC

Someone actually added the tag "vore" to this post because of a misconcepton by a commenter who rarely ever tags/edits posts themselves.

I'll make this simple, this s the most literal definition of what constitutes vore, taken directly from the wiki page itself.

Vore, short for "vorarephilia", is the attraction to the consumption, insertion, absorption, and/or digestion of a living creature by another. This can occur with any bodily orifice, regardless of real life anatomical function.

While the word "vore" can describe the paraphilia itself as well as "the act" — the depiction of a character consuming another living creature alive — as a tag vore is exclusively for scenes where a character is actively consuming/has consumed another, and/or a character is being actively consumed/has been consumed by another.

As I'm writing the comment this post is correctly tagged, don't fuck it up now.

wolfmanfur said:
Someone actually added the tag "vore" to this post because of a misconcepton by a commenter who rarely ever tags/edits posts themselves.

I'll make this simple, this s the most literal definition of what constitutes vore, taken directly from the wiki page itself.

As I'm writing the comment this post is correctly tagged, don't fuck it up now.

I just want to put this here, from the same wiki page:

"Entirely non-fetishistic depictions of natural predation should never be tagged as vore"

I'd argue this is non-fetishistic but I don't think this counts ENTIRELY as natural predation. I think this is one of those rare cases where the tagging conventions don't accurately represent a picture (similar to the "x" cartoon anuses always being tagged explicit when a vast majority of the pictures are completely innocent enough). Similarly, I'd say this is NOT questionable in the slightest, but it's hard to argue that this doesn't count as "vore" according to the tag description, therefore it shall remain as questionable.

Muchachos, podré no tener cerebro pero tengo una idea

I just wish this artist drew SEX!