April 10th: The bill has been vetoed!
April 2nd: The politicians in Arizona are about to sign into law a bill that would mandate sites like e621 to either impose age verification on all users or be at a risk of lawsuits. Such system would be required to go through third party vendors, who in turn must go through a government database to verify every user's age. This is not only a major violation of privacy, but it also opens up a very real danger of identity theft through phishing schemes and other methods, not to mention that we would not be able to control any of that information to make sure it is permanently deleted after age verification is complete.
Unfortunately, Arizona is the state out of which e621 operates, which means that this law will almost certainly affect us if it is to pass. If want to help us ensure that this site can continue to serve you without being required to know who you are, please ask the Arizona governor to veto this bill.
Please, help us get the word out by letting others know about this issue.
For some further information on what the bill does have a look at https://action.freespeechcoalition.com/bill/arizona-hb-2586/
We still have a Discord server, come talk to us!
Want to advertise on e621? Click here!
[ Blacklist Help ]
You must be over the age of 18 and agree to the terms of service to access this page.
By default a limited blacklist has been applied hiding content that is commonly objected to. You may remove items from this blacklist by using the blacklist menu item.
m3g4p0n1
MemberThis post is png and the other is jpeg. BUT the other has noticeably better res.
What are the odds two users upload the same thing just 2 minutes appart from each other?
Alacritical
Memberas much as I love trickster magician Meowscarada, I also love it when that gets subverted with posts like these
Mairo
JanitorI hate this current meta between Twitter and Furaffinity because of this exactly.
Sure we now get better quality copies, but only to some degree unless the artist also pays for FA+ and now instead of FA just being just straight up bad compared to twitter, it takes more time to check individual cases.
Twitter image is pretty compressed and chroma subsampled, so even if resolution is higher, you do get a lot more artifacting including visible macroblocking and color information is halved in dimensions, causing even higher color bleed and smudging.
I would almost say that you might get ever so slight amount of more single pixel level detail on higher resolution version, it's also altered with compression and color information is way much worse, so even if the resolution difference is this high, this version starting already relatively high resolution (diminishing returns and all that) makes this still far superior in quality IMO
Ammacfarlane1
Membernice change of pace
ryee
Memberstop ruining the fun, cmon
BB-Bitch
Memberhttps://e621.net/posts/2275110
Login to respond »