You can not view this image.

This post was deleted or flagged for the following reasons:

  • [DELETION] Does not meet minimum quality standards (Artistic) - slyroon -
Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • Yes. Right. Correct. Cheaper. Nevermind the fact that with such easy access to such a large bounty of jerky, mysteriously a lot more jerky will now get eaten per day compared to before, that is not important, it's still cheaper per pack and that's what matters. And anyway more packs being consumed just means the savings per pack compound harder, clearly making this an even better decision

  • Reply
  • |
  • -3
  • legitimateparsley said:
    Yes. Right. Correct. Cheaper. Nevermind the fact that with such easy access to such a large bounty of jerky, mysteriously a lot more jerky will now get eaten per day compared to before, that is not important, it's still cheaper per pack and that's what matters. And anyway more packs being consumed just means the savings per pack compound harder, clearly making this an even better decision

    I mean, it depends on the person's self control.
    If they only eat a few pieces of jerky a day, then it's absolutely a great deal in every sense of the word. Not everyone eats more if they have access to more.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • legitimateparsley said:
    Weird misapprehension

    If the unit cost decreases, the alleviation of want begotten per dollar spent increases. This is what prices mean. If you increase your consumption, it's only as a result of a relatively higher satisfaction from jerky as opposed to, say, other food sources---economization functions just the same when the tradeoffs aren't denominated in currency.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • euadonis said:
    I mean, it depends on the person's self control.
    If they only eat a few pieces of jerky a day, then it's absolutely a great deal in every sense of the word. Not everyone eats more if they have access to more.

    Mostly I was trying to be funny (which doesn't seem to have landed - might be the tone not translating), but the fact is the experience where an easy access to snacks leads to more of those snacks being consumed compared to the usual rate is actually pretty common, and nothing makes for "easy access" quite like having a huge bulkload of it on hand. And so the "savings" in cash might actually end up being pretty illusory, especially since even bulk price jerky will probably be relatively expensive compared to other options. On the other hand, getting that bulkload not for cash savings but because it makes Green happy (especially if he gets to eat more jerky now), that'll just work out well with no extra caveats.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0