loveless00 said:
Removed "cuntboy" and "intersexed" tags and added "ambiguous_gender." Guy on top has a pseudo-labia, not a vagina (think sheath, but for reptiles). The one on the bottom could be anything in this pic.

Put them back on, because by the purview of twys, it should be labeled a cuntboy.

them two again :3 nice work.

corgi_bread said:
Put them back on, because by the purview of twys, it should be labeled a cuntboy.

I might be wrong, but wouldn't that make loveless correct then? Or am I missing something. I do not personally see a defined gender of the bottom in this picture.

Zanazoth said:
I might be wrong, but wouldn't that make loveless correct then? Or am I missing something. I do not personally see a defined gender of the bottom in this picture.

One on the bottom looks male enough, albeit girly, to me to warrant the tag. Absence of a penis doesn't necessarily disqualify a character for the male tag.

loveless00 said:
Do you see an actual vagina though? No. If TWYS fails, you look at the characters' other pics, which indicate the top is male. I see psuedo-labia, which means no vaginal opening, which means not cuntboy. Also, you don't see an actual vagina on the bottom one, right? Don't see it, it's not there to be tagged. Removed again.

Instead of getting into a worthless edit war, maybe you should just follow the rules and conventions of the site.

angrysquirrel said:
Instead of getting into a worthless edit war, maybe you should just follow the rules and conventions of the site.

Or, controversial new idea here, you could masturbate. To the porn. It's right there.

UnderWater said:
Or, controversial new idea here, you could masturbate. To the porn. It's right there.