Viewing sample resized to 99% of original (view original) Loading...
Description

Salazzle and scolipede time

Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • finally the dude got to experience that sweet scolipede donut after getting teased for 3 videos

    It actually looks like he's tasting something else right now

  • Reply
  • |
  • 35
  • suessi said:
    Don't tag this as "gay" if it's a woman and a man.

    The Scolipede is a Male (you can see his balls resting on the humans legs). Just because there's also and intersex involved doesn't invalidate the male/male tag (which is the actual tag searched if you search gay)

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • carnivore4lyf said:
    The term you're looking for is "gynomorph." Gynomorphs are typically females with a large phallus. The only clear identifiable male here is the receiver. The "male/male" tag is a mistagging. Whether or not it's gay comes down to personal taste, but "male/male" this isn't.

    Site rule is tag what you see. So as there're no visible sign that the human or scoliped are anything but males the male/male tag still applies (as based on sight 2 males are having sex) along side the intersex tag (the general term for something having characteristics for both genders) and the gynomorph tag (the specific term for the vaariaty of intersex the salazzle is)

  • Reply
  • |
  • 4
  • flood said:
    Site rule is tag what you see. So as there're no visible sign that the human or scoliped are anything but males the male/male tag still applies (as based on sight 2 males are having sex) along side the intersex tag (the general term for something having characteristics for both genders) and the gynomorph tag (the specific term for the vaariaty of intersex the salazzle is)

    There's no visible sign to properly determine what the Scolipede actually is either. We can see the Salazzle is clearly a gynomorph, and the receiver is clearly a male, but the angle doesn't show enough to tell what the scolipede really is. The correct tagging in this instance would be male/ambiguous.

    Of course, unless the artist wants to weigh in on what we're seeing, that reasonable doubt will remain. But anyway, I think I'm with this. This isn't really my kind of argument, I'm more at home skirshming with those that treat fiction and reality with the same severity.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -6
  • carnivore4lyf said:
    There's no visible sign to properly determine what the Scolipede actually is either. We can see the Salazzle is clearly a gynomorph, and the receiver is clearly a male, but the angle doesn't show enough to tell what the scolipede really is. The correct tagging in this instance would be male/ambiguous.

    Of course, unless the artist wants to weigh in on what we're seeing, that reasonable doubt will remain. But anyway, I think I'm with this. This isn't really my kind of argument, I'm more at home skirshming with those that treat fiction and reality with the same severity.

    well to be fair though we're not suppose to use off site info for tagging the creator did kind of weigh in already when they tagged the source as gay (plus those big scoliped ball resting on the guys legs very much imply male)

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1