Whoa OwO

So he feels no guilt about it. yet he wants to leave? well I guess i can't blame him. Lenore is quite sexy

Very common erotica story right here, worker and the wife characters, cheating style!

I like where this is going

-Frazzledragon said:
Human x Furry, not a fan of that.

You do realize that you are a human, right? Even if you get off fantasizing about being a furry with another furry character, you're still a human imagining being with a furry. Checkmate.

Cow said:
Checkmate.

Not at all.
I'm not that lost in fantasy either. And just because I am human doesn't mean that I have to like the content of this picture.

I love you Jay Naylor!!

And this reminds me of the movie Mandingo!

Cutting your pay? Well, he's getting the rest of his "pay" in pussy. Sounds legit. And hot.

Infidelity, the underprivileged enacting revenge on their equally oppressed superiors, and a human woman fucking a horse. I wonder which of these Jay Naylor masturbated to the most.

Try and work as hard as you eat

Oh yeah, don't worry - he's working her hard!

And - hey - on the bright side IRS can't tax this kind of "workplace benefits" :)

When in doubt, pinky out.

Jay Naylor once again trying to trick people into believing he's really a deep and thoughtful individual who doesn't REALLY believe that all women are secretly sex crazed whores and that every problem everywhere can be solved with a bullet.

sylamorase said:
Jay Naylor once again trying to trick people into believing he's really a deep and thoughtful individual who doesn't REALLY believe that all women are secretly sex crazed whores and that every problem everywhere can be solved with a bullet.

Or maybe Jay's commissioners like this sort of thing. If you want him to make something "not sexist", pay him for a commission yourself. The golden rule is that those with the gold make the rules.

I know this comment is eight months old but whenever I see shit like this I have to dignify it with a response so that if you still go to this site, you'll at least see my reasoning.

Beepmaster said:
Or maybe Jay's commissioners like this sort of thing. If you want him to make something "not sexist", pay him for a commission yourself. The golden rule is that those with the gold make the rules.

I know this comment is eight months old but whenever I see shit like this I have to dignify it with a response so that if you still go to this site, you'll at least see my reasoning.

Except that would be a lot of commissioners that are all into the same thing. Paying a guy to pretend that he's not a prick for a day or two doesn't really solve any problems.
Don't worry about how old the post is, I'm the one with the eternally unpopular opinion. I can post a comment about how much I loved something and people will jump on to call me an idiot, it never fails.

-Frazzledragon said:
Not at all.
I'm not that lost in fantasy either. And just because I am human doesn't mean that I have to like the content of this picture.

Doesn't mean you have to voice your dislike, either. I politely suggest using the blacklist.

dragonfan13 said:
Doesn't mean you have to voice your dislike, either. I politely suggest using the blacklist.

First of all, it is quite reasonable to voice dislike. I'm not insulting art or artist, I'm am on subject with my words.
Secondly, how would you suggest I use the blacklist to avoid this situation without filtering out all furry or human content? I never said I have a distinct hatred for either, so that's impossible. Not a fan does not equal that I dislike the picture or art itself.
Thirdly, I don't use the blacklist because I know how to behave in the comments, I'm not going on rant parades, I merely, without hidden meanings and insults, share my opinion on a picture and even in the things I generally dislike one can find a nice exception picture once in a while.

Let's stop with the drama

-Frazzledragon said:
First of all, it is quite reasonable to voice dislike. I'm not insulting art or artist, I'm am on subject with my words.
Secondly, how would you suggest I use the blacklist to avoid this situation without filtering out all furry or human content? I never said I have a distinct hatred for either, so that's impossible. Not a fan does not equal that I dislike the picture or art itself.
Thirdly, I don't use the blacklist because I know how to behave in the comments, I'm not going on rant parades, I merely, without hidden meanings and insults, share my opinion on a picture and even in the things I generally dislike one can find a nice exception picture once in a while.

I meant you can filter out the human_on_anthro tag.

Beepmaster said:
Or maybe Jay's commissioners like this sort of thing. If you want him to make something "not sexist", pay him for a commission yourself. The golden rule is that those with the gold make the rules.

I know this comment is eight months old but whenever I see shit like this I have to dignify it with a response so that if you still go to this site, you'll at least see my reasoning.

There really isn't any reasoning or anything that needs explained... You tell someone they can do something...

regardless, it's not just commissioned stuff, Jay is into these things, clearly. Occassionally he does actually try to flesh things out, while there is nothing wrong with that, he does tend to fall flat.

Also, I beat your 8 months by 2 years lol.

Kingfish said:
Doesn't mean you have to voice your dislike, either. I politely suggest using the blacklist.

Nothing wrong with stating his opinion, just like you do. So someone doesn't agree with you, get over it.

reading those old comments reminds me how insufferably drama hungry the furry fandom used to be lmao.