News: Feb 26, 2025 Show

Feb 26th:A new bill in Arizona is making its way through the Senate that would force sites like e621 to implement mandatory age verification for all users—or face potential lawsuits. This system would require third-party vendors to verify every user’s age through a government database. Not only is this a massive violation of privacy, but it also introduces serious risks, including identity theft through phishing schemes and other malicious methods. Worse still, we would have no control over ensuring that user data is permanently deleted after verification.

Since e621 operates out of Arizona, this law would almost certainly impact us if it passes. If you want to help ensure that we can continue serving you without being forced to collect personal information, we urge you to contact Arizona’s senators and ask them to vote NO on this bill.

Please help spread the word about this issue and encourage others to take action.
Further information on the bill itself can be found at the Free Speech Coalition: https://action.freespeechcoalition.com/bill/arizona-hb-2112/

Jan 7th: Small update to the Uploading Guidelines today: We now no longer allow paintovers of AI generated content. Or in other words AI generated content that has been edited to some degree by humans.

We still have a Discord server, come talk to us!
Want to advertise on e621? Click here!
Are you an artist uploading your own art to e621? Get verified now!

Viewing sample resized to 80% of original (view original) Loading...
Blacklisted (0)
Disable All Filters
  • Comments
  • This is easily the most frames I've ever seen and the most beautiful one second animation ever. I'm instantly following your work and can't wait to see more! <3

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • panig said:
    Ashley is canonically underage, is she considered 18+ in this artwork?

    She was born 1984 and the year the RE4 takes place is 2004ish. That would've made her 18+. Your question is invalid.

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • 36
  • panig said:
    Ashley is canonically underage, is she considered 18+ in this artwork?

    Ashley is also a few lines of code on a hard drive. So what's your point?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 11
  • ineeda said:
    I'm very happy to see so many great artists joining on the "Moushley" train. Lovely animation!

    I’m late to the party… why is ashley a mouse now? I mean, internet, duh, of course, but still…why? I‘m confused and in need of assistance here

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
  • bakayaro said:
    I’m late to the party… why is ashley a mouse now? I mean, internet, duh, of course, but still…why? I‘m confused and in need of assistance here

    science-snake-altair said:
    I have much the same question.

    I dont recall the artist but someone drew a cute fanart of Ashley as a mouse girl in response to seeing pics of her with huge ears.

    edit: post #3951857

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
  • meatfactory said:
    I dont recall the artist but someone drew a cute fanart of Ashley as a mouse girl in response to seeing pics of her with huge ears.

    edit: post #3951857

    As the artist of this piece I can confirm that that Moushley post linked is the one that inspired me to draw this, thank Ponporio for retweeting it and getting it into my eyes first

  • Reply
  • |
  • 8
  • panig said:
    Ashley is canonically underage, is she considered 18+ in this artwork?

    You know she's fictional, right?

    She isn't real, no one is being hurt in real life, and a bunch of points, lines, and color can't consent either, again, because they don't exist...

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • yiffmation2 said:
    You know she's fictional, right?

    She isn't real, no one is being hurt in real life, and a bunch of points, lines, and color can't consent either, again, because they don't exist...

    real helpful, pal.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -8
  • First time I've seen cute furry RE 4 porn so I'm trying to not think about what the environment *smells* like lol

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • panig said:
    Ashley is canonically underage, is she considered 18+ in this artwork?

    How interesting, so fiction character age matters? What about all the cub porn you have in your faves?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 25
  • yiffmation2 said:
    You know she's fictional, right?

    She isn't real, no one is being hurt in real life, and a bunch of points, lines, and color can't consent either, again, because they don't exist...

    She's not underage either so its a moot point.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 10
  • qwazzy said:
    It actually is, yeah.

    not really. the argument is "muh fictional character", which is already invalid in the case of ashley. she's 18, dont need to spout out the good ol "but shes fictional, so." stuff.

    downvote, i dont really mind. just sayin'.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -8
  • lambchan said:
    not really. the argument is "muh fictional character", which is already invalid in the case of ashley. she's 18, dont need to spout out the good ol "but shes fictional, so." stuff.

    downvote, i dont really mind. just sayin'.

    Well she is fictional, and in case you've forgotten, you are fiddling your diddle to animal creatures. If we can justify getting off to fake animals, humanoid or not, then what's the problem with yanking it to fake "underage" characters? Most of us would never even think of hurting kids or animals irl anyway, i know i don't, so whats the harm. Imo the art lets us weird fetishists have a harmless outlet, that's coming from a vorariphile, so while I'm not into cub/loli I sure as shit can't be against it considering.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
  • micwhaley said:
    Well she is fictional, and in case you've forgotten, you are fiddling your diddle to animal creatures. If we can justify getting off to fake animals, humanoid or not, then what's the problem with yanking it to fake "underage" characters? Most of us would never even think of hurting kids or animals irl anyway, i know i don't, so whats the harm. Imo the art lets us weird fetishists have a harmless outlet, that's coming from a vorariphile, so while I'm not into cub/loli I sure as shit can't be against it considering.

    thats not even the point of what im saying, youre just saying you jerk off to underage stuff, while the actual point is that ashley is over 18, there is no need to tag it as loli or young.

    as someone said before, it's a moot point.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 7
  • knickknack said:
    She was born 1984 and the year the RE4 takes place is 2004ish. That would've made her 18. Your question is invalid.

    2004 -1984 = 20… am I stupid or was there a miscalculation here

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • I see no bnnuy once again so.I shall do my daily task and remove the tag since there's only da mouse, Leon who I'm 95% sure is a canine in this work since for a brief frame before repeating the loop you can see what I assume is his knot and the two shadowy figures. One I can confirm is a type if.feline due to the tail while the other I dunno.
    Edit: for some reason the Lagomorph tag won't go poof so IG it'll just exist.

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Over 18?

    You must be 18 years or older and agree to the terms of service to access this website.

    Content that is commonly considered objectionable is blacklisted by default. You may remove tags from this blacklist using the corresponding menu item.