Tag what you see. I see a solo image. He has cum dripping from his ass, but there is no proof of a partner. Nothing in sight can identify sexual orientation.

DarkWolf6052 said:
there is no proof of a partner.

Either:

A) He fucked himself.
B) He used a toy filled with fake cum.
C) He was fucked by a herm/dickgirl.
D) He was fucked by another male.

Occam's Razor; I'll go with D.

CandleJake said:
Either:

A) He fucked himself.
B) He used a toy filled with fake cum.
C) He was fucked by a herm/dickgirl.
D) He was fucked by another male.

Occam's Razor; I'll go with D.

Doesn't matter what you want to assume. You can only tag what you see. Period. This is not a new rule.

CandleJake said:
Either:

A) He fucked himself.
B) He used a toy filled with fake cum.
C) He was fucked by a herm/dickgirl.
D) He was fucked by another male.

Occam's Razor; I'll go with D.

When in doubt. A

DarkWolf6052 said:
Tag what you see. I see a solo image. He has cum dripping from his ass, but there is no proof of a partner. Nothing in sight can identify sexual orientation.

Hm, I was under the impression that you were supposed to tag gay for males with cum in 'der butts. Guess I was wrong.

Peekaboo said:
Hm, I was under the impression that you were supposed to tag gay for males with cum in 'der butts. Guess I was wrong.

could be lube...

Peekaboo said:
Hm, I was under the impression that you were supposed to tag gay for males with cum in 'der butts. Guess I was wrong.

Nah, that is the current policy...or at least was, two months ago: forum #84236

(Probably should be added to the tag wiki, but I'm not fluent enough in English to do that.)

Genjar said:
Nah, that is the current policy...or at least was, two months ago: forum #84236

(Probably should be added to the tag wiki, but I'm not fluent enough in English to do that.)

I can't disagree with that. That's very clearly an admin saying that if there's cum on a male butt, and they're solo, that the image can safely be tagged "Gay".

If an admin could clear this up just to make sure, that would be great.

current system says gay.

He has the words, "Knot me!" on his ass. Add the cum leaking on his balls and ass, and I'm pretty sure he's a gay subby. Use your brains people.

Herm and dickgirls can have a knot. Hell, a toaster could have a knot. KNOTS FOR EVERYONE! YAY!

Oprah

TrannyFur said:
KNOTS FOR EVERYONE! YAY!

Oprah: Foxes get a knot! Cats get a knot! Raccoons get a knot! Dragons get a knot! EVERY! BODY! GETS! A KNOT!!

CandleJake said:
OprahOprah: Foxes get a knot! Cats get a knot! Raccoons get a knot! Dragons get a knot! EVERY! BODY! GETS! A KNOT!!

Me too? :D

TrannyFur said:
Herm and dickgirls can have a knot. Hell, a toaster could have a knot. KNOTS FOR EVERYONE! YAY!

I miss null.

DarkWolf6052 said:
Tag what you see. I see a solo image. He has cum dripping from his ass, but there is no proof of a partner. Nothing in sight can identify sexual orientation.

He has "Knot me" written on his big beautiful asscheek...

I think he's gay. I think I'm gay too.

Why would it say "Knot Me!" if it was a solo image?

Vezzie said:
Why would it say "Knot Me!" if it was a solo image?

get ready for it... aliens

Solo images feature one character. Unless a sign of another person is present(which there isn't, because cum doesn't count) I hope I at least made clear why it is a solo.