I know it can only be tagged ambiguous gender, and that's perfectly fine. Going by Tom's other images here however, I am leaning towards girl.

Must this really be tagged ambiguous?

31h253 said:
Must this really be tagged ambiguous?

Well, it seems like the best choice to me. It's feminine, yes, but it could very well be male.

Depending on Tom's study of human anatomy, this character is female. Though it is hard to tell the broadness and width of the shoulders proves that this character is unable to be a male. This makes sense because SCIENCE! But if he hasn't read anything about human anatomy then this could still be a male.

Looking at her chest plates, I detected some slight bumps. I wont say for sure those are breasts or anything, but looking at the artists history, my opinion is swayed to the more feminine argument here. Not to mention if it was a feral female, wouldn't the plates continue in the V pattern from neck to tail, Im noticing a descrepency in her chest area.

Only my opinion however, still anybody's guess.

It's a girl, stop muddling up the issue.

Belen said:
It's a girl, stop muddling up the issue.

Tagging on e621 is delicate business. Even though this is obviously female to me, there is no direct evidence. Therefore the tags stay ambiguous.

Damn the rules, ANARCHY!

On a side note, this isn't Nora so I wonder who this character is or will be. She might just be a concept char/doodle. alas time will tell, and I can't w8 for the imminent epicness X3