Quite an interesting experience, that would be.

Sokatoah said:
Quite an interesting experience, that would be.

I must agree completely.

could this count a bestiality?

i love pic's like these *stares while day dreaming*

wow.... no words.... just wow *drools in amazement want...*

MorganaTwist said:
So if its a feral one with no human intelligence or consciousness in its thoughts then yes. And if it can speak and consent then no.

If I remember my lore correctly, all dragons are able to talk and are inherently smarter than men.

madninjaskillz said:
If I remember my lore correctly, all dragons are able to talk and are inherently smarter than men.

What about wyverns? They are mostly depicted as very feral/aggressive/instinctive dragons.

syrmat said:
What about wyverns? They are mostly depicted as very feral/aggressive/instinctive dragons.

The only evidence from the internet that I have is the dictionary.com definition of Wyvern. It says that it's basically just a two-legged dragon.

madninjaskillz said:
The only evidence from the internet that I have is the dictionary.com definition of Wyvern. It says that it's basically just a two-legged dragon.

That's a dictionary, you need an encyclopedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wyvern

A wyvern is *NOT* a dragon. I cannot emphasize this enough.

I don't really like the word beastiality I like to say zoofhilia instead I don't like how I feel inside wen I say beastiality.

Foxenton said:
I don't really like the word beastiality I like to say zoofhilia instead I don't like how I feel inside wen I say beastiality.

Bestiality is more related to "animal raping perverts with only sexual-pervert intentions", and zoophilia is more related to that special caring and love interest, that would be expressed sexually in a consensual and respectful form... or something like that.

Foxenton said:
I don't really like the word beastiality I like to say zoofhilia instead I don't like how I feel inside wen I say beastiality.

Bestiality* is the act. Zoophilia* is the fetish.

Cybernid said:
That's a dictionary, you need an encyclopedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wyvern

A wyvern is *NOT* a dragon. I cannot emphasize this enough.

It actually depends how you define dragon - being mythical creatures their exact definition is ambiguous, but what we can (mostly... probably...) agree on is that a wyvern is not the same thing as a western dragon, as western/european dragons have 4 legs and wyverns have 2.

Cybernid said:
A wyvern is *NOT* a dragon. I cannot emphasize this enough.

Oh how wrong you are.

mostly questioning...
1: are we sure this is a dragon? scalie sure, but dragon? are we sure its not just some sort of lizardman?
2: Just a personal opinion, but I believe a wyvern may be in the dragon family for similairities, but technically cannot be called a dragon based on mythology, IE "dragons" have always been intelligent beings, usually of magical proportions, magic almost certainly being an intelligence based thing, short of your sorcerer of emotions, or sorcerer because sex, or "surprise guess I was born into a magic family and didn't know it!" stories. Wyverns have never been depicted with intelligence as far as I can remember, thus while they have dragon-like qualities, I imagine they wouldn't technically be dragons...not that I imagine they would care about the differentiation as much as say a dragon would.
but considering we are talking about mythical beings, it technically doesn't matter outside the context of the world/story/game/whatever.

too bad there isn't any more from this guy :(