changing tags because that looks more like young female than a crosdresser male

Mutisija said:
changing tags because that looks more like young female than a crosdresser male

Could just as well be a young crossdressing male. Tag as "ambiguous_gender" if needed.

chdgs said:
Could just as well be a young crossdressing male. Tag as "ambiguous_gender" if needed.

well ambiguous_gender it is then

penance is in the back ground...

Very beautiful eyes! I love them.

Seems Taylor has failed. He still looks adorable.

Mutisija said:
changing tags because that looks more like young female than a crosdresser male

Check the source, it's a male character.
https://inkbunny.net/submissionview.php?id=534011

nicko said:
Check the source, it's a male character.
https://inkbunny.net/submissionview.php?id=534011

It's "tag what you see". Outside sources don't account for much other than character name or franchise.

For more info: check the droplist under "THE DEBATE"
https://e621.net/wiki/show?title=e621%3Atag_what_you_see_%28explained%29

chdgs said:
It's "tag what you see". Outside sources don't account for much other than character name or franchise.

For more info: check the droplist under "THE DEBATE"
https://e621.net/wiki/show?title=e621%3Atag_what_you_see_%28explained%29

Really? Because a character looks feminine you can't tag it for what gender it actually is? That seems weird to me; but I guess I understand.

Let's just say: If you like girls, then it's a girl, if you like boys, it's a boy.
And if you like both, it's both and so on.

nicko said:
Really? Because a character looks feminine you can't tag it for what gender it actually is? That seems weird to me; but I guess I understand.

TWYS can seem counter-intuitive sometimes when it conflicts with what we know about an image versus what can be generally be perceived. It's not a perfect system, but it works better for the majority of images.

And it's not like crossdressing twinks are the only subject where this sort of debate arises.
https://e621.net/post/show/412248/

XeonWolf said:
Let's just say: If you like girls, then it's a girl, if you like boys, it's a boy.
And if you like both, it's both and so on.

I agree. I'm sure most people will. Just because something is tagged as something else doesn't mean we can't enjoy it for what we decide to perceive it as.

However, it's a matter of what shows up when we're searching for whichever we prefer. Personally, I don't understand why something cannot be tagged as all three if it can fit the bill for both ambiguity and/or either gender. It's a case-by-case sort of thing, I guess.

XeonWolf said:
if you like boys, it's a boy.

That doesn't work because it looks like a girl.

CandleJake said:
That doesn't work because it looks like a girl.

I;m not going to start and argument because you obviously dins't got what I was triying to say.

Is it a girl...
or a boy...
...
Fuck it, bend over.

this is literally the most adorable thing i've seen all week

Looks like a girl to me, so under TWYS I'm tagging male/female

Catachan said:
Looks like a girl to me, so under TWYS I'm tagging male/female

You don't SEE a girl, you interpreted a girl. There is a very important and distinct difference in those concepts. Under the TWYS rule, the character must be categorized as ambiguously gendered, because there is no visible evidence in this image-- nothing we can see-- which indicates that she is a girl over a trap, or vice versa. I retagged the image as ambiguous_gender, and removed female tag and male/female tag for this reason.

Good lord I would Wife Taylor so hard I don't care male or female I am 99.99.1% So in love!