She's so sexy that I can even forgive that second pair of tits which creeps me out a little. In fact, I think she's the sexiest of them all!

hmm best looking tigress i've seen in along time ^^

I'm usually not a fan of photo edits as they never look natural, but damn, this is exactly what I would want a real life tigress to look like :D

hell yeah >;D

The extra nipple is weird, but still, daaaaamn.

4 boobs?
Sure she is hot but 4 boobs?
Me no like!

Puuuuuurrrrrrrrrrrr :P

Turian said:
4 boobs?
Sure she is hot but 4 boobs?
Me no like!

You do realize that some real life human women have a 3rd (or more) nipple, right?

most beliveable/conceivably beleivable photomanip i can honestly recall seeing

Turian said:
4 boobs?
Sure she is hot but 4 boobs?
Me no like!

Well she /is/ a cat, you know.

Aguurin said:
Well she /is/ a cat, you know.

Cats & Dogs have 6 not 4.(SCIENCE!)

KibaXtra said:
Cats & Dogs have 6 not 4.(SCIENCE!)

she's half human, half cat. (2+6)/2=4 (MATHEMATICS!)

I see it on the wed in 1996

Turian said:
4 boobs?
Sure she is hot but 4 boobs?
Me no like!

Go back to school, grammar boy!

She looks too weird...

hmmm i have a question. what do you consider beastiality?

TheBluebird27 said:
hmmm i have a question. what do you consider beastiality?

Well its when a human does it with a animal?

BobMarley said:
Well its when a human does it with a animal?

yeah i guess asked the wrong question. are furries considerd beastiality? because if you think about it thier not really beast. Beast dont have the same sense as humans but furries do. so would fucking a furry be beastiality?

Imaderule34 said:
yeah i guess asked the wrong question. are furries considerd beastiality? because if you think about it thier not really beast. Beast dont have the same sense as humans but furries do. so would fucking a furry be beastiality?

Just had to correct you since you said it so many times, it's spelled "BESTiality" not "BEASTiality", or zoophilia if you wanna use that, sorry...

But essentially anything that's not homo sapiens on homo sapiens is bestiality => human on furry would thereof quite clearly be bestiality. But since furries doesn't exist this discussion is pointless :P

Secondly what says animals doesn't "sense" things just like you, it's just that they don't interact with you/things as a fellow human would (though, probably they don't).

Chessax said:
Just had to correct you since you said it so many times, it's spelled "BESTiality" not "BEASTiality", or zoophilia if you wanna use that, sorry...

But essentially anything that's not homo sapiens on homo sapiens is bestiality => human on furry would thereof quite clearly be bestiality. But since furries doesn't exist this discussion is pointless :P

Secondly what says animals doesn't "sense" things just like you, it's just that they don't interact with you/things as a fellow human would (though, probably they don't).

I Disagree with you completly. If aliens where to come down (which no one can prove if they exist or not) and had higher levels of intellegence than us and they just so happened to look like an animal of some sort, i think it's bull to call them a beast. if thats the case then we're just as much beast as the rest of them. i know that dogs can feel pain and joy and all that, i just meant the way of thinking like a human has.

The rational behind the illegality of bestiality is that
A. Animals can't consent
B. Bestiality is frequently harmful to the animals involved
C. Christianity, as well as most other religions, generally condemn the act.

Bestiality = Person + Animal
Is a furry a person, or an animal? I mean the ones in the art. The ones in the suits are people of course. Mostly.
They certainly are capable of consenting to sex though, either way.

I think if anthros really existed, and were sentient and whatnot, then they'd just be considered another type of "people". Furry-rights activists and shit, protesting for better wages, insurance-covered contraceptives, etc.

nice picture

BagelCollector said:
I'm usually not a fan of photo edits as they never look natural, but damn, this is exactly what I would want a real life tigress to look like :D

Are you kidding? I would settle for that in a DREAM

you all idiots because its a painting of a women whom the artist saw her as a tigeress

Atani said:
The rational behind the illegality of bestiality is that
A. Animals can't consent
B. Bestiality is frequently harmful to the animals involved
C. Christianity, as well as most other religions, generally condemn the act.

Bestiality = Person + Animal
Is a furry a person, or an animal? I mean the ones in the art. The ones in the suits are people of course. Mostly.
They certainly are capable of consenting to sex though, either way.

I think if anthros really existed, and were sentient and whatnot, then they'd just be considered another type of "people". Furry-rights activists and shit, protesting for better wages, insurance-covered contraceptives, etc.

I'm sorry, but, I have to point out that when you were listing off the reasons, the first word started with the same letter as the the method of listing you were using...

(Lionheart) said:
Go back to school, grammar boy!

He's just translating 'cause he's spanish "No me gusta!"

surprised no noe uncensored any of this yet

DOESN'T ANYONE HERE REALIZE THIS ISN'T PHOTOSHOPPED? You can clearly see the detailed shading.

Sex with a furry would be the same as with an alien, so Interspecies, not bestiality or the likes... that's just my 2 bits.

Also, her face looks a little off, like her muzzle is a little bent to her left.

Still, pretty sexy, even with that patch of off color tooth floss down there

Tap dat XD

Moar

Hmm....
Tits x4 (+2)
Fur (+1)
Cute ears (+1)
Weird looking face (-1)
Hairy pussy (-2) / absolute turn-off for me :c
No butt shown (-1)
...Would likely start to consider maybe hitting it... Or not...

and thus the legacy of furballs_dc was born...

Imaderule34 said:
hmmm i have a question. what do you consider beastiality?

BobMarley said:
Well its when a human does it with a animal?

And Human Beings are Animals, so Every time you have sex, it's Bestiality. What you're talking about is Interspecies sex, which has been around as long as sex has, and in some ancient cultures wasn't even a "bad" thing.

It wasn't all that long ago that Interracial sex was considered just as "Bad" as Interspecies. Here's hoping for a little change.

Chessax said:
Just had to correct you since you said it so many times, it's spelled "BESTiality" not "BEASTiality", or zoophilia if you wanna use that, sorry...

But essentially anything that's not homo sapiens on homo sapiens is bestiality => human on furry would thereof quite clearly be bestiality. But since furries doesn't exist this discussion is pointless :P

Secondly what says animals doesn't "sense" things just like you, it's just that they don't interact with you/things as a fellow human would (though, probably they don't).

an "anthro" are an animal or human with animalistic/human traits.
whereas most "furries" are considered Anthros would this still be BESTality? ;P

nice pic... not a big fan of anything over two breasts though. (I have enough trouble with my own normal bras, who would want to have to deal with whatever god awful contraption they come up with for 4+ breasts?)

AHHHHH! *cowers in the corner sobbing*

That pussy hair makes me even more horny! I don't care who you are!

FusRoDerp said:
AHHHHH! *cowers in the corner sobbing*

*comforts you with hugging*

Extra nipples ftw <3

Yiffy_boy said:
She's so sexy that I can even forgive that second pair of tits which creeps me out a little. In fact, I think she's the sexiest of them all!

I loled so much... :P

I loooooooove it

Kill me.

holy shit, is that real life? Is it fantasy?

Atani said:
insurance-covered contraceptives, etc.

I get it, cause they fuck 24/7

BagelCollector said:
I'm usually not a fan of photo edits as they never look natural, but damn, this is exactly what I would want a real life tigress to look like :D

The face is too human for me.

I got to reading the comments about the extra pair of breasts on this one, and the fact that so many were kinda disturbed or undecided about it gave me a chuckle. I was born with 4 extra nipples, albeit smaller and less developed than the standard issue, one thing I've never seen in a situation like mine is my extras are completely symmetrical to one another. I just thought it was ironic that people were so occupied by an extra pair of breasts on an edited photo, when I'm a real living person with 2 extra sets.

XxShrikexX said:
He's just translating 'cause he's spanish "No me gusta!"

Which literally translates to "It does not please me". "Me" is used as the object of a verb in Spanish. "Gusta" is what the picture is not doing to the user, not the other way around. That is why it says "gusta" and not "gusto", which would refer to the first person.

It just turns out "I don't like it." is more coherent and far less hammy than "It does not please me."

That's a real pic

KILL IT WITH FIRE

Derp300 said:
KILL IT WITH FIRE

How bout no

Motherfucking ANCIENT.

I remember seeing this picture floating around the internet in the mid-90s. I thought it was the hottest shit ever.