Ogerdong

iant said:
This is canonically incorrect ogerpon is female.

Like that ever stoped anyone

Love him so much in this one, Kyurisawa does it again <3

iant said:
This is canonically incorrect ogerpon is female.

Rule 63 exists, sorry it's news for you

littenlover3 said:
She's simply a trans bbg

No, simply rule 63 of the character. In this drawing it's a him, unless explicitly stated otherwise by the artist.

iant said:
This is canonically incorrect ogerpon is female.

https://e621.net/posts?tags=fav%3AIanT+crossgender+

given plenty of your favorites I don't see why you bring it up

iant said:
This is canonically incorrect ogerpon is female.

O RLY? Do tell more as if anybody actually gives. People can draw Ogerpon however they want, male or female. Again, it’s not that serious.

iant said:
This is canonically incorrect ogerpon is female.

I mean, it's Kyurisawa, girls with weiners is their bread and butter

seiryuj said:
I mean, it's Kyurisawa, girls with weiners is their bread and butter

Not in this case tho, they have drawn girls (with boobs) and penises yes, but in this case it only has a penis, so we can only assume it's 100% male genderswapped.

poofinator said:
https://e621.net/posts?tags=fav%3AIanT+crossgender+

given plenty of your favorites I don't see why you bring it up

Holy crap these favs have so many canonically incorrect arts!

verysadfox said:
Like that ever stoped anyone

Is ogerpon strictly female? Or is that just from a story aspect cause ogerpon could be a species like the eon duo, the legendary birds beasts, and the Regis

cryptid258 said:
Is ogerpon strictly female? Or is that just from a story aspect cause ogerpon could be a species like the eon duo, the legendary birds beasts, and the Regis

No, Ogerpon is strictly female

zduy said:
No, Ogerpon is strictly female

In game it says that and we only have one ogerpon as an example. If theres a "Female" There must be a male unless ogerpon can change genders or grow male organs

iant said:
This is canonically incorrect ogerpon is female.

For your sake we better pretend it is "Gynomorph"

cryptid258 said:
In game it says that and we only have one ogerpon as an example. If theres a "Female" There must be a male unless ogerpon can change genders or grow male organs

By your logic there are female latios and male cresselia.

cryptid258 said:
In game it says that and we only have one ogerpon as an example. If theres a "Female" There must be a male unless ogerpon can change genders or grow male organs

Or she has to find a male trainer to reproduce, which I think is more likely uwu

Delicious

silveryfeather said:
By your logic there are female latios and male cresselia.

For those I'ds say their counterparts are the counterparts kinda like how sexual daimorphism works

cryptid258 said:
In game it says that and we only have one ogerpon as an example. If theres a "Female" There must be a male unless ogerpon can change genders or grow male organs

As far as I know, the Pokemon series has never needed to explain legendary or mythical Pokemon breeding because there's canonically only one per world, or save file, or whatever. Never has there been a rule where "oh if there's a female pokemon there must also be a male version", judging by 100% female/male lines, especially for legendaries. Most legendaries can't breed anyway, a lot of them don't have a sex set for that. The only exception I can think of is Manaphy, which lays Phione eggs. But yeah, besides the fact that it's simply Rule 63 art and you're reading into this too hard, Ogrepon and 99% of other legendaries have no thought put in by the Pokemon Company for breeding.

iant said:
This is canonically incorrect ogerpon is female.

I have repented for what I said I guess I was very sleep deprived. My bad

nuachro said:
Love him so much in this one, Kyurisawa does it again <3

Rule 63 exists, sorry it's news for you

No, simply rule 63 of the character. In this drawing it's a him, unless explicitly stated otherwise by the artist.

Ik dawg I just thought it'd be funny to call her trans

Lov-e-LY!~

iant said:
This is canonically incorrect ogerpon is female.

Canonically no one cares

cryptid258 said:
In game it says that and we only have one ogerpon as an example. If theres a "Female" There must be a male unless ogerpon can change genders or grow male organs

There are already quite a few species which are male only or female only. It's also very well established that pokemon can successfully breed with other closely related (i.e. in the same egg group) species - they do not need to be the actual same species - so there's no logical contradiction in a female-only species (male-only does raise some questions, but that's not relevant to this particular discussion).
There is also the possibility that Ogerpon is unique in the first place, and that perhaps it was originally a normal female of a different species of pokemon, and somehow transformed or mutated into its current state, thus becoming one of a kind (like how Diancie is a special kind of Carbink).

bbbbobbbb said:
There are already quite a few species which are male only or female only. It's also very well established that pokemon can successfully breed with other closely related (i.e. in the same egg group) species - they do not need to be the actual same species - so there's no logical contradiction in a female-only species (male-only does raise some questions, but that's not relevant to this particular discussion).
There is also the possibility that Ogerpon is unique in the first place, and that perhaps it was originally a normal female of a different species of pokemon, and somehow transformed or mutated into its current state, thus becoming one of a kind (like how Diancie is a special kind of Carbink).

Then what species could ogerpon be from? it'd have to be an undiscovered since no other pokemon looks like orange elmo in a jeinbei

nice dong

concept8192 said:
As far as I know, the Pokemon series has never needed to explain legendary or mythical Pokemon breeding because there's canonically only one per world, or save file, or whatever. Never has there been a rule where "oh if there's a female pokemon there must also be a male version", judging by 100% female/male lines, especially for legendaries. Most legendaries can't breed anyway, a lot of them don't have a sex set for that. The only exception I can think of is Manaphy, which lays Phione eggs. But yeah, besides the fact that it's simply Rule 63 art and you're reading into this too hard, Ogrepon and 99% of other legendaries have no thought put in by the Pokemon Company for breeding.

There's multiple of most legendaries, like the 2 mewtwo, like at least 5 of the kanto birds, many copies of the johto dogs living in different regions, entei literally get born every time a volcano erupts, male and female cosmogs evolve into different legendaries, there's infinite phione, also Arceus gives birth in an event in hgss