Crossdressing or dickgirl. Pick one.

Random said:
Crossdressing or dickgirl. Pick one.

Why not both?

Random said:
Crossdressing or dickgirl. Pick one.

Easy to miss, but the cat "girl" has a large bulge going down her left leg. So yes both do apply to this image since we have a dickgirl playing with a male in crossdress.

XeonWolf said:
Why not both?

Since dickgirls aren't inside the gender binary, they really aren't capable of crossdressing by definition. So the tag doesn't apply to them. As a result a picture of a dickgirl alone wouldn't have the crossdressing tag as well.

Random said:
Crossdressing or dickgirl. Pick one.

How's about no. :3

Nekrosilisk88 said:
Easy to miss, but the cat "girl" has a large bulge going down her left leg. So yes both do apply to this image since we have a dickgirl playing with a male in crossdress.

Could also technically be a herm, or a male stuffing... or a female stuffing bellow xD The tag system kinda goes hazy in that area.

Sammy_Brooker said:
How's about no. :3

agreed

My god, that fox is so damn cute. More of him (or "her" if you prefer).

Kattlarv said:
Could also technically be a herm, or a male stuffing... or a female stuffing bellow xD The tag system kinda goes hazy in that area.

True, but as we can't see that packing is evident, or female genitalia, we have to go off what we can see.

Nekrosilisk88 said:
True, but as we can't see that packing is evident, or female genitalia, we have to go off what we can see.

Going with that, I'm not sure it can qualify as a "dickgirl" tag then. As it's not apparent if it is a penis. Could just be latex gloss, angle or what have you... and technically the "male" looks quite a lot like a flat chested girl... but ah well. Technically this is where you include a bit of "what the artist intended" xP

Nekrosilisk88 said:
True, but as we can't see that packing is evident, or female genitalia, we have to go off what we can see.

Also I, the commissioner of the pic was the one who tagged and the tag what you see thing is relevant since there's no female genitals to be seen.

Kattlarv said:
Going with that, I'm not sure it can qualify as a "dickgirl" tag then. As it's not apparent if it is a penis. Could just be latex gloss, angle or what have you... and technically the "male" looks quite a lot like a flat chested girl... but ah well. Technically this is where you include a bit of "what the artist intended" xP

Except Bailey has a penis in plain site so obviously not a girl ;p

TrannyFur said:
My god, that fox is so damn cute. More of him (or "her" if you prefer).

If I had the money to do so then yes I would. As it stands there will be more of my Wild dog first, then my new OC which no ones seen yet.

Sammy_Brooker said:
If I had the money to do so then yes I would. As it stands there will be more of my Wild dog first, then my new OC which no ones seen yet.

I await patiently. *wags tail*

Sammy_Brooker said:

One of them yes :P
But yeah, as said:the tagging system here can be a bit iffy. Like, at times it's questionable if a ex: 1'st person view of a futa can be tagged futa, unless it can be proven it's futa and not male :P Trailing off here anyhow, it seems to have passed the mods approval x3

TrannyFur said:
My god, that fox is so damn cute. More of him (or "her" if you prefer).

i prefer stocking armwarmers a fun time and some good ole crossdressing