Out of curiosity, despite the year, wouldn't this be considered 'The "underrated(s)"'?

xenfox18 said:
Out of curiosity, despite the year, wouldn't this be considered 'The "underrated(s)"'?

All but the last two films depicted here are of the period typically called the "post-Renaissance" or the "Experimental Era" (I prefer the latter term myself); Bolt and The Princess and the Frog are part of the Disney Revival. Also, Lilo & Stitch isn't really an "underrated" film considering that it was a critical and commercial success during its theatrical run (even if its success is seen as lesser than films from both the Disney Renaissance and Disney Revival), to say nothing of Stitch being a merchandising powerhouse to this day.

xenfox18 said:
Out of curiosity, despite the year, wouldn't this be considered 'The "underrated(s)"'?

With exception of Stitch, I think they all deserve more love. ❤️
(stitch already gets plenty)

hamsterboy said:
With exception of Stitch, I think they all deserve more love. ❤️
(stitch already gets plenty)

Would you say that it was good that they were considered "underrated", what with how "Disney" is now?

alien_fluff said:
All but the last two films depicted here are of the period typically called the "post-Renaissance" or the "Experimental Era" (I prefer the latter term myself); Bolt and The Princess and the Frog are part of the Disney Revival. Also, Lilo & Stitch isn't really an "underrated" film considering that it was a critical and commercial success during its theatrical run (even if its success is seen as lesser than films from both the Disney Renaissance and Disney Revival), to say nothing of Stitch being a merchandising powerhouse to this day.

Brother bear deserves some love.

The post-Renaissance era.

ginkei said:
The post-Renaissance era.

No, this has all the 2000s-released entries (though technically Fantasia 2000 premiered in 1999); Bolt and The Princess and the Frog are part of the Disney Revival, not the Experimental Era.