Spot the 5 differences!
I couldn't...

Iona said:
Spot the 5 differences!
I couldn't...

It was difficult to get it to that point.

At first, there were smudges all over the image on the right. I mean, like, over every part of the body you wouldn't want smudged up.

I never quite achieve to view these correctly. I can see the 3D image in the background using the finger trick but as soon as I try to get my attention on the picture itself my eyes just kinda go back to normal. Is there a trick to do that? Or should I use a smaller object? (as a finger takes hides a good chunk of the image.)

I can view these fine-ish. But they're always blurry, especially when I get closer to the picture, which I need to do as they always shrink to half size when doing this eye trick.

I read that it works better if the width of the picture is the same as the distance between the eyes. Is it true?

Weird, I was just thinking last week about maybe doing this to this image.

The biggest problem with these is that they don't do rounded shapes well, which is a problem since the best parts of women are round. In the case of the chest here the shading is enough to fool your brain, but the knees look like paper cut-outs because the tops don't actually "curve away" from the viewer.

Armadax said:
I read that it works better if the width of the picture is the same as the distance between the eyes. Is it true?

Sort of! The smaller the distance between the two objects the easier it is to get your eyes to cross and focus on the objects.

RinArenna said:
Sort of! The smaller the distance between the two objects the easier it is to get your eyes to cross and focus on the objects.

And the bigger the part of the image hidden by my finger becomes. I really need to learn how to do without it.

Fiddled a bit with the dimensions and now I can do it. Still blurry as balls though.

Armadax said:
Fiddled a bit with the dimensions and now I can do it. Still blurry as balls though.

Yeah, it'll probably take a lot of practice. The only reason it's so easy for me is the fact I've been doing it for years. Since I was seventeen, so six years.

I don't know how you manage it. After half an hour of trying, I have slight trouble focusing.

It takes some practice (being able to cross your eyes helps). On my second try I was able to focus and see the image clearly in 3D, but that only lasted a few seconds.

The best way to see these is to sit at a good distance from the screen, cross your eyes just enough that you can tell the images match up, and then try to relax and keep that point focused. It'll look blurry for a few seconds, but then it should start slowly clearing up until it's nice and crisp.

So basically, distance, cross, match, relax, wait.

Hello, welcome to the bottom of the comment section! For those of you who ventured this far in an attempt to learn the trick to viewing these images, here's a friendly tip!!

These pictures are actually epic trolls. Don't waste an hour of your life trying to figure out how to do it. All the people saying it works are trolls too.

Public service announcement

Would love a gif version. I'm unable to cross my eyes so it bugs me not being able to see these pseudo 3d images.

If you're having too much trouble, try moving further away from the image. I was a good 2-3 feet away until my eyes finally focused properly and stuck that way.

Epic!

Great work, but I still don't get one thing: why does every person make the stereogram pictures in the reverse? The way this pic works, it makes the eyes hurt.
Actual stereograms (which suppose to make your eyes relax, and are curative for short-sighted people) aren't meant to be viewed by the eyes crossed.
They are suppose to be viewed by distancing your vision focus "far behind" the monitor until two images merge in 3, making the central one 3D.
To make this pic work non-hurting way, the two halves have to be swapped.
BTW, you can watch the oculus rift videos on YT using a method I subscribed

Feretta said:
The best way to see these is to sit at a good distance from the screen, cross your eyes just enough that you can tell the images match up, and then try to relax and keep that point focused. It'll look blurry for a few seconds, but then it should start slowly clearing up until it's nice and crisp.

So basically, distance, cross, match, relax, wait.

Hey, it's a sailboat!

Feretta said:
The best way to see these is to sit at a good distance from the screen, cross your eyes just enough that you can tell the images match up, and then try to relax and keep that point focused. It'll look blurry for a few seconds, but then it should start slowly clearing up until it's nice and crisp.

So basically, distance, cross, match, relax, wait.

and then fap

groovesan said:
Great work, but I still don't get one thing: why does every person make the stereogram pictures in the reverse? The way this pic works, it makes the eyes hurt.
Actual stereograms (which suppose to make your eyes relax, and are curative for short-sighted people) aren't meant to be viewed by the eyes crossed.
They are suppose to be viewed by distancing your vision focus "far behind" the monitor until two images merge in 3, making the central one 3D.
To make this pic work non-hurting way, the two halves have to be swapped.
BTW, you can watch the oculus rift videos on YT using a method I subscribed

Well, there are two reasons.

First, it's for viewing larger images. The eyes can only change focal crossing to a certain distance, which is when your eyes are straight forward. With cross-eye viewing, you can view larger images. It's not particularly meant to be therapeutical.

Second, cross-eye images are more common for 3D stereograms than Side-by-Side.

Actually the easiest way to see 3d is this: close your left eye and look at the left picture, cover the right picture by holding right palm in front of your face, then do similar steps for your other eye and opposite picture.

Limiting fields of view of the eyes to opposite pictures is very easy.

Another method for those who have a 3DS is to take a 3d photo when the pictures align properly on the 3DS. I've found zooming the picture out helps for that method.

Did you make this, if so, what program and technique did you use? I have made a few stereograms, and posted them here, but the work for my technique is a bit tedious. Some good advice would be awesome. Also, if this is yours, great job!!

If someone even made this a gif so that she is beathing and blinking i'd be so happy <3 geat work i love it.

Good job on perspective, the legs look closer than the head.

Hair above the tail

Armadax said:
I never quite achieve to view these correctly. I can see the 3D image in the background using the finger trick but as soon as I try to get my attention on the picture itself my eyes just kinda go back to normal. Is there a trick to do that? Or should I use a smaller object? (as a finger takes hides a good chunk of the image.)

Try to look past the screen then let the image on screen focus in on its own but don't actually focus on the screen itself.

yuricat said:
Try to look past the screen then let the image on screen focus in on its own but don't actually focus on the screen itself.

this one is a bit too big to look past the screen. if you have the ability to cross your eyes, just cross them until the two eyes meet

Have been experimenting the viewing technique since I was a little kid, crossing eyes to overimpose pictures to find differences and that stuff.
It was actually very confusing often finding these stereograms and trying to crosseye on them and finding out they were reversed, now this picture works right but many people still try to achieve this result with the one technique that doesn't require crossing them, but it only works for very small pictures, hence the usage of this method with slide photos in special viewing boxes.
Happy to see Feretta fixed many guys' problems there :D

Phis said:
Would love a gif version. I'm unable to cross my eyes so it bugs me not being able to see these pseudo 3d images.

https://e621.net/post/show/443147/2011-animated-anthro-anus-bottomless-breasts-butte

Wow! This is really well done! The depth and quality is amazing! It's as if it were an actual 3D model.
Masterpiece.