it seems the orgasm caused her hindlegs to break.

Mittsies said:
it seems the orgasm caused her hindlegs to break.

They just went dead....Blood wasn't getting to them xD

Fine ill make them jerk more but there just bending forward meanies XD

I enjoyed the two recent uploads. Though I think her legs would've spread and hips jerked forwards instead. It'd seem more enthusiastic of her.

Not overly sure on the placement or proportion, but it's a quite good try, and flows relatively well. Bit off odd joint bending as said but xP
And not overly sure on their overall demeanor, he doesn't seem that into it somehow... not sure what exactly, but there's just something about him that looks kinda "meh" about it.

And well... while run of the mill, you didn't post it during the flood, so it does stand out a little I guess?

Mittsies said:
it seems the orgasm caused her hindlegs to break.

It hurts so good

CaptainFabulass said:
It hurts so good

I laughed harder then I should have at your comment XD

Kattlarv said:
Not overly sure on the placement or proportion, but it's a quite good try, and flows relatively well. Bit off odd joint bending as said but xP
And not overly sure on their overall demeanor, he doesn't seem that into it somehow... not sure what exactly, but there's just something about him that looks kinda "meh" about it.

And well... while run of the mill, you didn't post it during the flood, so it does stand out a little I guess?

He? Thats not a guy... Remember who your talking to here friend :/ All my models are female. And you can see her this time around rather then aj in the last pic we had this kinda disscussion in

I thought she was eating her front hoof for a second.

Mr.Tektite said:
He? Thats not a guy... Remember who your talking to here friend :/ All my models are female. And you can see her this time around rather then aj in the last pic we had this kinda disscussion in

As the author you of all people should be able to see a huge dick coming out of that pony. Maybe your parents never told you this, but boys have a penis, girls have a vagina. This is a man, a colt. Not female.

Sorry to be a dick, but your post was just nonsense. Unless you were making some in-joke reference between you two, in which case ignore me.

TailsClock said:
As the author you of all people should be able to see a huge dick coming out of that pony. Maybe your parents never told you this, but boys have a penis, girls have a vagina. This is a man, a colt. Not female.

Sorry to be a dick, but your post was just nonsense. Unless you were making some in-joke reference between you two, in which case ignore me.

In real life perhaps youd be correct... welcome to porn artwork on the internet were the newest growing fetish is dick girls and futas... Welcom you must be new here if you dont already know this.

TailsClock said:
As the author you of all people should be able to see a huge dick coming out of that pony. Maybe your parents never told you this, but boys have a penis, girls have a vagina. This is a man, a colt. Not female.

Sorry to be a dick, but your post was just nonsense. Unless you were making some in-joke reference between you two, in which case ignore me.

Are you not aware that dickgirls, herms, and cuntboys exist?

Mr.Tektite said:stuff

Hum... okay, have to ask: You seem a bit lost in terms of genus/sexual identity. As, if you insinuate anything with a female looking model is to be considered "female", or anything male looking is to be "male", if you, you clearly could need to do some work into that area.

Just slapping a dick/cunt on something doesn't automatically make something male/female. (Also, it's not "newest growing", it's actually old as dirt, fetish wise speaking) Granted, it can be hard, or technically to tell just by looks, but in general, a chars gender identity depends on they see themselves as/acts like. (and somehow "herm" herms are a small minority, along with the female herms) But if you want to indicate all chars you "create" as like... MtF, post-op transexuals, then sure, I'd gladly call them female then.

Kattlarv said:
stuff

The thing is herms dont exist outside of stories or fiction cause its not possible (from what ive come across) to have both genitalia that are fully funtional. Dont quote me cause some ass will come along trying to dispute that and im not 100% positive

as for the many terms that exist like futa dick girl transgendered or whatever the hell else the one I use is futa... but this site has a very disputable tagging system so I dont use that instead I use dick girl (wich fits pretty much what I was going for in my mind)

There are plenty of disputes agains what I think of with gender roles or whatever else. The end thing in my mind though is why is this such a problem? are people that specific about there porn that they have to have it mapped out to the most specific detail? if it has a dick but no balls its this. BUT if it has balls and dick but no vagina but looks female its this if it looks male but has a vagina it falls into fucked up realm of controversy.

I keep it simple. They are female. They have male genitalia. were in your mind you can argue all you like about it this one fact will remain... I see them as females.futa/dick girls/ whatever. I dont see them as males that say there female I dont see them as herms who dont identify as either... This is the way I do things and ill go as far as to tag a sign in the background of every image I do that says "these two are both/ this one is" and write under it futa or dick girl or whatever I feel I want them to be for that particuler instance and this is were I feel the controversy come in...

You cant prove me wrong and the addition of that would destroy your claims cause the work itself is telling you what it is... However if the problem still arises or some admin tells me thats not how it works then fine. But your not seeing my stuff here anymore cause I wont have terms marked on my work that I dident want there in the first place.

Ill resond to this later and srry for spelling mistakes I got to leave fast cant dwell on it.

Creeperkil99 said:
what if that is possible?

???

Mr.Tektite said:
...

Yes but ponies

Guess I'm "the ass". I have seen with my own two eyes a true hermaphrodite. She has all the piping and stuff however is sterile in the female half.

100% functional Berkshire are 0% possible yes. But ones that have one side sterile are. All her parts work, just cant get pregnant. Shes able to knock her mate up though.

Esme_Belles said:
Guess I'm "the ass". I have seen with my own two eyes a true hermaphrodite. She has all the piping and stuff however is sterile in the female half.

100% functional Berkshire are 0% possible yes. But ones that have one side sterile are. All her parts work, just cant get pregnant. Shes able to knock her mate up though.

Berkshire....what the fuxk is that... meant herm. Damn auto correct

Esme_Belles said:
Berkshire....what the fuxk is that... meant herm. Damn auto correct

Well... according to this

Esme_Belles said:
Berkshire....what the fuxk is that... meant herm. Damn auto correct

exactly they can have both "parts" but the term herm would mean that there both funtioning not with one sterile. but idk doesent matter really

Mr.Tektite said:pile of text

(Remember to section text longer than 2-3 rows to not clog the chat)

Kattlarv said:
(Remember to section text longer than 2-3 rows to not clog the chat)

Well, considering humans, I'm relatively sure there's existed at least a couple. Rare as fuck, but considering all other types of mutations we've seen... but yes, the "generic porn herm" is not real, just like most porn norms aren't real. And both have about the same chance of existing. Plus: Hey, this is the internet. There will always be some retard, no matter the cause, and try to argue against it.

Yeah... this site has a VERY messy tagging system sometimes. Sometimes it does well when clumping tags together, other times it just ends up all "...wat?".

And the reason why it's a "deal", is because quite a lot of people "misuse/neglect" them. Having shallow, predetermined opinions. (like that anything "female looking" is "she", or anything "male looking" is "he". I've seen quite a few people refuse to call MtF and/or "cuntboy" characters as "she", or at times "he". But it's mainly just a... guess "respect" is the best term I can think of atm, but a "respect issue". As I see more people willing to accept and/or incorrectly call herms for "her" than people willing to call a cuntboy or MtF "her". Which is rather disrespectful as a whole.

So... if I got that right, it was more or less a "I don't give a single fuck about their anything, I just call them what I feel like because I can."? If so, I do have to say you feel a little bit too "everyone has to think like me" mentality. (per se) As like stated before: If even just one saw it as "anything else", you'd want it removed as then it was "ruined"...

And that I cannot, nor can you prove yourself "right". As it's technically impossible to do with things like these. Yes, you can give strong indicators, but that won't stop people from either tagging what they see, or imagine something else. Though as said before: I really don't see why it would be such a huge deal if someone does that. If someone would prefer to imagine it to be a generic dude, they will. Doesn't stop those like you to imagine it's a MtF transexual/futa/whatever, "like intended". And not sure if this is the correct term, but I'm getting a slight vibe of delusions of grandeur from you. Perhaps "OCD" is more accurate? As you seem VERY intent on only "allowing" it to be done/seen "your way", none else is allowed. Added to that it almost sounded like you came off as I no longer had "your permission to gaze upon your work". Comes off as a teensy bit.. you know...

And eh, that's fine, I took a couple of days to reply myself.

I guess it comes down to whether or not your term would interfere with mine. Put it this way aslong as the female and dick girl tag or futa wichever allied was on a pic then im happy even if male is also put down but if putting male down means the other tags would be removed then I wont let the other tag be there.

I know its a tad hissy fit-ish but thats just how I do things :/

Mr.Tektite said:stuff

Well, it's not exactly "my term" per se... but anyhow, I'm quite sure it can have "all tags", both male and futa. As like said; We tag what we see. Not what we want it to be, per se. (usually at least) Point being, do know there's people that'll call and see your "females" for "male" or herm, not "female", for reasons such as: they're not given any indication it "is" a female, or the char see's themselves as such. But do know you most likely can keep the futa tag for about all your uploads.

And well... it felt a bit more "spoiled brat" than "hissy fit", or whatever to call it. As like said: You seemed quite a bit "IF I CAN'T HAVE IT EXACTLY THE WAY I WANT IT, NO ONE CAN HAVE IT!". As said, still a bit perplexed, yet impressed by your dedication of "having it your way." So to say.