Unf.

Dude look like a lady!
Bana!
Bana!
Dude look like a lady!

She-- I mean HE-- looks hot in that outfit. I just had to say that.

Caitlyn Jenner of the furry fandom.

RandomYiffing said:
Caitlyn Jenner of the furry fandom.

this looks better.

Goingforawalk said:
Dude look like a lady!
Bana!
Bana!
Dude look like a lady!

always-dreamin said:
She-- I mean HE-- looks hot in that outfit. I just had to say that.

Is there actually in-image evidence that this is a crossdressing man? Looks purely female to me, and we tag what we see in the image, not what outside sources (Artists included) say.
Yes, the panties have a bit of "Puff" to them, but that just makes them look padded/thicker than the "I'm literally showing off my pussy through this thin fabric" panties.

Furrin_Gok said:
Is there actually in-image evidence that this is a crossdressing man? Looks purely female to me, and we tag what we see in the image, not what outside sources (Artists included) say.
Yes, the panties have a bit of "Puff" to them, but that just makes them look padded/thicker than the "I'm literally showing off my pussy through this thin fabric" panties.

There is nothing in the image suggesting male, although the character is typically tagged as such. Come to think of it, this has me wondering what exactly counts as an outside source, but that's another can of worms.

I now think the gender is ambiguous.

always-dreamin said:
There is nothing in the image suggesting male, although the character is typically tagged as such. Come to think of it, this has me wondering what exactly counts as an outside source, but that's another can of worms.

I now think the gender is ambiguous.

The thing was tagged as "Girly" to start with, perhaps because of the feminine lingerie, but that's sufficient to tag female with dresses, so I'd assume it's enough with lingerie. I'll ask an admin to be sure.

Female is fine.

Furrin_Gok said:
T

Fair enough.

duga is male in the games, of course there is a possibility of rule 63 although as stated by others this was already tagged to begin with, would it be ok if i were to change the tags appropriately or do you guys think i should just leave it open (a little new to the tagging thing)

So this would be a muscular rule 34 version of a male character?

It seems more likely that it's just cross dressing.

Furrin_Gok said:
Is there actually in-image evidence that this is a crossdressing man? Looks purely female to me, and we tag what we see in the image, not what outside sources (Artists included) say.
Yes, the panties have a bit of "Puff" to them, but that just makes them look padded/thicker than the "I'm literally showing off my pussy through this thin fabric" panties.

I think if the the person who drew it says it's male, I think i's go with that more than anything else, especially assumption...

this is also part of a set of pictures that show that this is indeed a male.
i'm aware that rule 63 is a thing, however this ain't it, sweetie...

also... in risk of sounding bitchy...

Furrin_Gok said:
we tag what we see in the image, not what outside sources (Artists included) say.

Isn't that kinda like saying "Yes he made it, yes he defined it, but I'm going to disregard that to make my personal head canon reality."?

zanjll said:
I think if the the person who drew it says it's male, I think i's go with that more than anything else, especially assumption...

this is also part of a set of pictures that show that this is indeed a male.
i'm aware that rule 63 is a thing, however this ain't it, sweetie...

Not what our rule is. Our rule is literally only look at this image. If you don't see evidence in this image, it doesn't count.

zanjll said:
also... in risk of sounding bitchy...

Isn't that kinda like saying "Yes he made it, yes he defined it, but I'm going to disregard that to make my personal head canon reality."?

Yes, it is. That's what our rule is.

Furrin_Gok said:
Not what our rule is. Our rule is literally only look at this image. If you don't see evidence in this image, it doesn't count.
Yes, it is. That's what our rule is.

but by that same logic, this seems more ambiguous then female as there is no evidence for either gender...
this just seems completely nonsensical...

zanjll said:
but by that same logic, this seems more ambiguous then female as there is no evidence for either gender...
this just seems completely nonsensical...

If you can't see the female when an admin has already made a ruling that yes, it is female, then stop tagging genders where it's so confusing. Simple as that. You don't need to add every single little tag by yourself.

Furrin_Gok said:
Yes, it is. That's what our rule is.

I like how you didn't even attempt to combat that question, just said "Yes, my head canon goes"

TokaiTori said:
I like how you didn't even attempt to combat that question, just said "Yes, my head canon goes"

Eh, some things aren't worth arguing over. It's better to paint yourself in the extreme to get a point across sometimes.

Goingforawalk said:
Dude look like a lady!
Bana!
Bana!
Dude look like a lady!

But that's narancia's theme song .>.

Goombafan333 said:
So this would be a muscular rule 34 version of a male character?

It seems more likely that it's just cross dressing.

Exactly. Just like all the other pics.

Furrin_Gok said:
Is there actually in-image evidence that this is a crossdressing man? Looks purely female to me, and we tag what we see in the image, not what outside sources (Artists included) say.

This is normally a male character and it isn't a crossgender pic. Note also the male body fat distribution and waist-to-hip ratio.
For context, here's a crossgender pic from the same artist:

post #71770

Yes, the panties have a bit of "Puff" to them, but that just makes them look padded/thicker than the "I'm literally showing off my pussy through this thin fabric" panties.

That's a genital bulge.

DSR1337 said:
Exactly. Just like all the other pics.

This is normally a male character and it isn't a crossgender pic. Note also the male body fat distribution and waist-to-hip ratio.
For context, here's a crossgender pic from the same artist:

post #71770

That's a genital bulge.

That's not how our system works. If it looks female (ie, wearing thick lingerie), it counts as female. That's why Ratte locked the tags to female.

A masterful mix of masculine and feminine features