News: Feb 26, 2025 Show

Feb 26th:A new bill in Arizona is making its way through the Senate that would force sites like e621 to implement mandatory age verification for all users—or face potential lawsuits. This system would require third-party vendors to verify every user’s age through a government database. Not only is this a massive violation of privacy, but it also introduces serious risks, including identity theft through phishing schemes and other malicious methods. Worse still, we would have no control over ensuring that user data is permanently deleted after verification.

Since e621 operates out of Arizona, this law would almost certainly impact us if it passes. If you want to help ensure that we can continue serving you without being forced to collect personal information, we urge you to contact Arizona’s senators and ask them to vote NO on this bill.

Please help spread the word about this issue and encourage others to take action.
Further information on the bill itself can be found at the Free Speech Coalition: https://action.freespeechcoalition.com/bill/arizona-hb-2112/

Jan 7th: Small update to the Uploading Guidelines today: We now no longer allow paintovers of AI generated content. Or in other words AI generated content that has been edited to some degree by humans.

We still have a Discord server, come talk to us!
Want to advertise on e621? Click here!
Are you an artist uploading your own art to e621? Get verified now!

hilda and selene (nintendo and etc) created by morpskorp
Viewing sample resized to 56% of original (view original) Loading...
Blacklisted (2)
Disable All Filters
  • Comments
  • Is there a tag for when pregnancy is explicitly mentioned in dialogue but not physically present?

    i don't see one on this post, but the implication that a dog is gonna get you pregnant kinda ruins this for me lmao, but I dunno if there's a tag for that at all, so I can't blacklist the concept, I've already got pregnancy in there, but this does not have the pregnancy tag, because nobody is pregnant, they're just implying pregnancy

  • Reply
  • |
  • 7
  • skunge-o said:
    Is there a tag for when pregnancy is explicitly mentioned in dialogue but not physically present?

    i don't see one on this post, but the implication that a dog is gonna get you pregnant kinda ruins this for me lmao, but I dunno if there's a tag for that at all, so I can't blacklist the concept, I've already got pregnancy in there, but this does not have the pregnancy tag, because nobody is pregnant, they're just implying pregnancy

    I apologize for the difficulty. If there's anything I can do about it, please let me know!

  • Reply
  • |
  • 10
  • skunge-o said:
    Is there a tag for when pregnancy is explicitly mentioned in dialogue but not physically present?

    i don't see one on this post, but the implication that a dog is gonna get you pregnant kinda ruins this for me lmao, but I dunno if there's a tag for that at all, so I can't blacklist the concept, I've already got pregnancy in there, but this does not have the pregnancy tag, because nobody is pregnant, they're just implying pregnancy

    there was once an "implied impregnation" tag on e6, but it got eaten by "cum in pussy" bc the site likes to get rid of tags it sees as superfluous. Granted, not every ejaculate implies impregnation so I'd argue it IS a necessary tag, but what do I know

  • Reply
  • |
  • 30
  • There's gotta be a term for the whole "intrigued onlooker is told they're next" thing. It's one of the hottest themes, but is not exactly searchable.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 35
  • skunge-o said:
    Is there a tag for when pregnancy is explicitly mentioned in dialogue but not physically present?

    i don't see one on this post, but the implication that a dog is gonna get you pregnant kinda ruins this for me lmao, but I dunno if there's a tag for that at all, so I can't blacklist the concept, I've already got pregnancy in there, but this does not have the pregnancy tag, because nobody is pregnant, they're just implying pregnancy

    With the lack of the "Implied Impregnation" tag, I feel the best you could do is blacklist "vaginal", "cum inside" and "feral" (and/or "Canine" if your disliking is specifically dogs getting someone pregnant) together. Why "implied impregnation" got absorbed by "cum in pussy" I have no idea, especially thanks to the reasoning by JustAMirrage. You can have a "cum in pussy" instance without impregnation, just the same as you can have a "cum in pussy" instance with impregnation. Tale of Tails is an excellent example of this, there is a ton of instances of characters cumming in pussies without any kind of protection without impregnation resulting. Honestly no tags should ever be removed in my opinion because of niche instances, and this one isn't even incredibly niche to begin with.

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
  • morpskorp said:
    I apologize for the difficulty. If there's anything I can do about it, please let me know!

    You don't have to do anything, you're good.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • aj_lover69xx said:
    Despite what it may seem in drawings, haystacks are not comfortable

    Not true. I've slept plenty of times on haystacks, after partying. As long as you have a pillow, they're quite comfortable

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • tacticalyumi said:
    Man I wanna find more like this. The showing it to a group thing.

    An audience is always hotter than doing it in private, at least for pervs like me with an exhibitionism kink :P

  • Reply
  • |
  • 6
  • justamirrage said:
    there was once an "implied impregnation" tag on e6, but it got eaten by "cum in pussy" bc the site likes to get rid of tags it sees as superfluous. Granted, not every ejaculate implies impregnation so I'd argue it IS a necessary tag, but what do I know

    No, you are right, "implied impregnation" needs to come back

  • Reply
  • |
  • 4
  • hunnun said:
    Not true. I've slept plenty of times on haystacks, after partying. As long as you have a pillow, they're quite comfortable

    Well, I don't see a pillow, so Ihave to agree with post one.

    I don't like hay
    It is rough and irritating, and it gets everywhere.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 8
  • hojocat said:
    An audience is always hotter than doing it in private, at least for pervs like me with an exhibitionism kink :P

    I'm with you

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Over 18?

    You must be 18 years or older and agree to the terms of service to access this website.

    Content that is commonly considered objectionable is blacklisted by default. You may remove tags from this blacklist using the corresponding menu item.