Buster is a boy, not an ambiguous gender

someone should take this and add some "special parts"

SonicGay said:
Buster is a boy, not an ambiguous gender

I know, but that doesn't matter here. Tag what you see. This picture doesn't show any genitals, what you do however see are a lot of feminine traits. Highly ambiguous.

And I agree, this should have some 'special parts'. A pose as seductive as this showing featureless lower regions just makes the whole thing feel empty.

Oh, and finally, this also means we cannot use the Crossdressing tag, since we don't 'know' if this is supposed to be a male.

someone should i make it happen. Unfortunately i lack the skills

Can't someone just ask the artist?

SkyWulf said:
Can't someone just ask the artist?

0r0ch1. Some people have asked or at least hinted at the idea on furraffinity. But this is just kind of a tease tbh

So, umm, I decided to give this a try... (^^;)

http://i.imgur.com/iQWigIa.png

I'm sure 0r0ch1 could do it miles better.

Jugofthat said:
So, umm, I decided to give this a try... (^^;)

http://i.imgur.com/iQWigIa.png

I'm sure 0r0ch1 could do it miles better.

good enough for me, thx for the effort

SonicGay said:
good enough for me, thx for the effort

No biggie, doing stuff like this teaches me a lot so it's all good. :)

Jugofthat said:
So, umm, I decided to give this a try... (^^;)

http://i.imgur.com/iQWigIa.png

I'm sure 0r0ch1 could do it miles better.

And a pat on the back for you...just give me like another 2 minutes.

Jugofthat said:
I know, but that doesn't matter here. Tag what you see. This picture doesn't show any genitals, what you do however see are a lot of feminine traits. Highly ambiguous.

Yeah no, while your logic makes sense due to the fact that 95-100% of people know buster is a dude it needs to be a male tag there. So I'm destroying the ambig tag...

Wow! More like this =D

RollerCoasterViper59 said:
Yeah no, while your logic makes sense due to the fact that 95-100% of people know buster is a dude it needs to be a male tag there. So I'm destroying the ambig tag...

No you don't.

Ambiguous_gender stays on and male stays off.

NotMeNotYou said:
No you don't.

Ambiguous_gender stays on and male stays off.

Have you been living under a rock?

zackman1996 said:
Have you been living under a rock?

Yes, and I used the time there to learn the rules of this website and how to apply them.

I love how there's nothing there.

there I go burying my face again

so much cute!

♥

-_-

NotMeNotYou said:
No you don't.

Ambiguous_gender stays on and male stays off.

I'm actually responding to the entire idea, not of u guys' specific comments. I know that ur right in the overall idea, so I'm not suggesting anyone change anything(or keep it the same), I'm just wondering--the ambiguous gender is clearly visible, and if a character was. Supposed to have genitals, a lack of genitals would be the definition of gender ambiguity, but since as a complete character, male buster bunny doesn't have genitals, would any picture of buster(even without genitals)as he appears in the tv shows and such, be counted as just his normal male self(normal, being without any additions that might hint at a change, like a bow, or some other "feminine" change)? ...Unless of course an artists specified that their intent was to be ambiguous.

I'm just wondering where the line is in the coppywritten character area? Obviously the artist has all the say, but in a case like this where it's left....ambiguous;)