scampi created by fivel
Description

i drew a scampi. cuz i love scampi <3
is this general or mature... you dont see anything
so...!!!

Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • Wolfgang415 said:
    That's why there's a #tagme tag. :3

    Technacally that's very far and away from being a reasonable excuse. It's usually a great idea for the uploader to add as many tags as they can prior to posting instead of relying on everyone else to post 95 percent of the tags for them.

    You've posted, that's a great start, now take some good classes on tagging! :3
    https://e621.net/wiki/show?title=e621%3Atagging_checklist

  • Reply
  • |
  • 4
  • If the author doesn't personally specify, flat-chested characters like this with no visible genitalia should always be tagged ambiguous. Exclusion by assumption is bad.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • Mdf said:
    Technacally that's very far and away from being a reasonable excuse. It's usually a great idea for the uploader to add as many tags as they can prior to posting instead of relying on everyone else to post 95 percent of the tags for them.

    You've posted, that's a great start, now take some good classes on tagging! :3
    https://e621.net/wiki/show?title=e621%3Atagging_checklist

    That's the second time someone posted that link to me.

    Anyway, I was joking about that #tagme tag, that's why I added in myself.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • PretentiousPeer said:
    If the author doesn't personally specify, flat-chested characters like this with no visible genitalia should always be tagged ambiguous. Exclusion by assumption is bad.

    Just checked, the post on Fur Affinity did specify she's a female in the keywords section.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • ippiki_ookami said:
    male tag added

    Wha? They said it's a female.

    Submission information:
    Posted: 2 days ago
    Category: All
    Theme: All
    Species: Crocodile
    Gender: Female
    Favorites: 227
    Comments: 34
    Views: 786

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Wolfgang415 said:
    Wha? They said it's a female.

    We don't based the tags from the source. We tag what we presently see in the pic. I agree with ippiki

  • Reply
  • |
  • -3
  • TheHuskyK9 said:
    We don't based the tags from the source. We tag what we presently see in the pic. I agree with ippiki

    Well, that's odd and inaccurate.

    Meh, what am I gonna do?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Wolfgang415 said:
    Well, that's odd and inaccurate.

    Not really. For example, if an artist uploads a banana and he says it's an apple, on here we are not going to tag it as an apple just because the artist said so. If someone wants to see an apple and they get this random banana out of nowhere, that's not what they were looking for. TWYS is the most accurate way to find what you are looking for.

    TL;DR If you see a banana but the artist say's it's an apple, you tag it as a banana.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • TheHuskyK9 said:
    Not really. For example, if an artist uploads a banana and he says it's an apple, on here we are not going to tag it as an apple just because the artist said so. If someone wants to see an apple and they get this random banana out of nowhere, that's not what they were looking for. TWYS is the most accurate way to find what you are looking for.

    TL;DR If you see a banana but the artist say's it's an apple, you tag it as a banana.

    Oh.. Ok. This kinda reminds me of the Hello Kitty Species Tag Incident. Some people said that Hello Kitty is a human girl and not a cat, I even pointed out that we should put what the people think about it.

    Thr creators say that it's human, but we say that it's a cat.

    It's the same thing, right?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Wolfgang415 said:
    Oh.. Ok. This kinda reminds me of the Hello Kitty Species Tag Incident. Some people said that Hello Kitty is a human girl and not a cat, I even pointed out that we should put what the people think about it.

    Thr creators say that it's human, but we say that it's a cat.

    It's the same thing, right?

    Literally everyone denied or joked that she's not a cat. We are still tagging Hello Kitty as a cat because she has the appearance of a cat.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH YYYYYEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Slim, strong ultra sexy archosaur ass!!!! INSTANT FAVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • I have changed the tag to ambiguous_gender, because male genitalia is not visible, and it could be a flat chested female.

    I think this is the fairest observation.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 4