I could be wrong but, by default, male Kangaskhan doesn't exist, so I guess we need a female tag here. But not sure, tho.

In the follow up picture, it is show that the Tyranitar is male, and Kangaskhan is indeed female.

Frogman417 said:
In the follow up picture, it is show that the Tyranitar is male, and Kangaskhan is indeed female.

We don't tag based on other images, we tag based on what is shown in the image in question without using outside information beyond what is necessary to determine species or character identity. There is nothing that distinguishes either Tyranitar or Kangaskhan in this image to be of any particular gender.

FatherOfGray said:
We don't tag based on other images, we tag based on what is shown in the image in question without using outside information beyond what is necessary to determine species or character identity. There is nothing that distinguishes either Tyranitar or Kangaskhan in this image to be of any particular gender.

While that is true; Kangaskans are ALWAYS female going by the games. This is relatively common knowlegde, and can be used as a reason to tag an otherwise-ambiguous one as female. Just like how you'd tag a human with breasts, but no visible lower genitals, as female.