what to call this? or does serving naked people already have a name?

That is a lot of macaroons.

Chef needs to learn how to hold a piping bag. =/

It was on that day that Steve truly regretted forgetting his contacts when he attempted to cut into what he assumed was a cake.

quinpussy said:
what to call this? or does serving naked people already have a name?

In Japan it is called Nyotaimori, the art of eating off a female body, also known as "Body Sushi". The male equivalent is called Nantaimori, same thing.

An observer to this practice from England, in an article I was reading described the person as "seeming to be awaiting a medal". Apparently you can pick the food from their body, or eat it directly off of them with your mouth. The person the food is served on it trained for hours to stay still, and often must have a layer of plastic between them and the food for sanitation reasons even though they take a bath before becoming the platter.

Raven_Blakwulf said:
In Japan it is called Nyotaimori, the art of eating off a female body, also known as "Body Sushi". The male equivalent is called Nantaimori, same thing.

An observer to this practice from England, in an article I was reading described the person as "seeming to be awaiting a medal". Apparently you can pick the food from their body, or eat it directly off of them with your mouth. The person the food is served on it trained for hours to stay still, and often must have a layer of plastic between them and the food for sanitation reasons even though they take a bath before becoming the platter.

awesome story! learn't something new today. what is i saw this in real life? hmmmmmmmmm...

I'd like a piece of that!

Khakiwolf said:
Chef needs to learn how to hold a piping bag. =/

The Chef is "serving" as a platter darling the chef's assistant needs more training.

VasukiSoarheart said:
The Chef is "serving" as a platter darling the chef's assistant needs more training.

You can't just make assumptions, darling.

okayokayokay said:
You can't just make assumptions, darling.

Not Assuming it's a reasonable deduction considering the implied statements

VasukiSoarheart said:
Not Assuming it's a reasonable deduction considering the implied statements

You're wrong.
Here is two reasons why:
1. The cat is bonded
He is unwillingly doing this, and the ram states that the chef will serve it himself. How can the cat serve himself while he is bonded with food on top of him.
2.The ram is wearing a chef toque.
A chef toque is typically reserved for the head chef NOT the assistant.(Yeah, IDK why the waitress or waiter in the doorway is wearing the hat.)

There just isn't enough in the picture to ratify your claim.

Canabolish

"Keep in mind 'macaron' is almost identical to 'macaroni'!"