News: Feb 26, 2025 Show

Feb 26th:A new bill in Arizona is making its way through the Senate that would force sites like e621 to implement mandatory age verification for all users—or face potential lawsuits. This system would require third-party vendors to verify every user’s age through a government database. Not only is this a massive violation of privacy, but it also introduces serious risks, including identity theft through phishing schemes and other malicious methods. Worse still, we would have no control over ensuring that user data is permanently deleted after verification.

Since e621 operates out of Arizona, this law would almost certainly impact us if it passes. If you want to help ensure that we can continue serving you without being forced to collect personal information, we urge you to contact Arizona’s senators and ask them to vote NO on this bill.

Please help spread the word about this issue and encourage others to take action.
Further information on the bill itself can be found at the Free Speech Coalition: https://action.freespeechcoalition.com/bill/arizona-hb-2112/

Jan 7th: Small update to the Uploading Guidelines today: We now no longer allow paintovers of AI generated content. Or in other words AI generated content that has been edited to some degree by humans.

We still have a Discord server, come talk to us!
Want to advertise on e621? Click here!
Are you an artist uploading your own art to e621? Get verified now!

vinyl scratch (friendship is magic and etc) created by skipsy and third-party edit
Viewing sample resized to 46% of original (view original) Loading...
Parent: post #487065 (learn more) show »
Description
Blacklisted (0)
Disable All Filters
  • Comments
  • munchiesnOOb said:
    I AGREEEEEEEEE~!!!!

    munchiesnOOb said:
    I agree with Brendon, these are the BEST!

    Fuck yeah they are~.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • CamKitty said:
    Fixed source. Imageboards are not valid sources, stop that.

    A 5 second google search is easy

    No. Source reverted back to the one I provided.

    First off, that's where I got the image from so the source stays. Secondly, this is an edit and the source that you changed it to is the source for the original female version of the picture therefore, it is incorrect. Third, what if an artist or editor uploads only on imageboards? You would put that down as the source because it's better than having no source at all. And if the source ever does expire it could be easily removed. No big problem.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -10
  • lemongrab said:
    No. Source reverted back to the one I provided.

    First off, that's where I got the image from so the source stays. Secondly, this is an edit and the source that you changed it to is the source for the original female version of the picture therefore, it is incorrect. Third, what if an artist or editor uploads only on imageboards? You would put that down as the source because it's better than having no source at all. And if the source ever does expire it could be easily removed. No big problem.

    Sources exist to send people to the artist who made the pic. the original is the closest to this. It's doesn't matter if it was an edit, unless it was an official edit, where it would link to that in thier gallery.

    Also just because you uploaded it doesn't mean you get some kind of magical dibs on what tags stay. Source links back to artist. The image board link would likely be dead in a month anyways. Image board links might as well be left blank since they don't send people to the artist anyways.

    See: https://e621.net/wiki/show?title=howto%3Asource for future reference. Namely "*Boorus or other unofficial image hosting sites" under invalid sources

  • Reply
  • |
  • 8
  • CamKitty said:
    Sources exist to send people to the artist who made the pic. the original is the closest to this. It's doesn't matter if it was an edit, unless it was an official edit, where it would link to that in thier gallery.

    Also just because you uploaded it doesn't mean you get some kind of magical dibs on what tags stay. Source links back to artist. The image board link would likely be dead in a month anyways. Image board links might as well be left blank since they don't send people to the artist anyways.

    See: https://e621.net/wiki/show?title=howto%3Asource for future reference. Namely "*Boorus or other unofficial image hosting sites" under invalid sources

    It's probably not wise to argue with Lemongrab, mate.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -3
  • CamKitty said:
    Sources exist to send people to the artist who made the pic. the original is the closest to this. It's doesn't matter if it was an edit, unless it was an official edit, where it would link to that in thier gallery.

    Also just because you uploaded it doesn't mean you get some kind of magical dibs on what tags stay. Source links back to artist. The image board link would likely be dead in a month anyways. Image board links might as well be left blank since they don't send people to the artist anyways.

    See: https://e621.net/wiki/show?title=howto%3Asource for future reference. Namely "*Boorus or other unofficial image hosting sites" under invalid sources

    Why not both?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Over 18?

    You must be 18 years or older and agree to the terms of service to access this website.

    Content that is commonly considered objectionable is blacklisted by default. You may remove tags from this blacklist using the corresponding menu item.