I think this is too far to still be site relevant.

-Frazzledragon said:
I think this is too far to still be site relevant.

Clearly you don't keep up with the site rules. The only porn that isn't allowed is real life humans.

StarchaserKD said:
Clearly you don't keep up with the site rules. The only porn that isn't allowed is real life humans.

That is wrong.
Images of human-ponies have been deleted before because they were simply human, with only minor resemblance of the inspiration character.

"Topic relevance

Is the post furry or otherwise anthropomorphic? If not, the post falls outside of e621's core purview, and may be deleted without warning"
This is fully humanized, no more furry resemblance.

And take careful note, I am not saying that all of them get deleted.

Woodside said:
Do you do literally nothing but comment on furry porn all day? I see on every single image.

You are gravely mistaken about what I do. I try my best to give proper critique when I can, it's far different from complaining.
Additionally, this right here has NOTHING to do with complaining, it's me wondering about the relevance to the SITE, not my personal interests.
Quiet down.

-Frazzledragon said:
You are gravely mistaken about what I do. I try my best to give proper critique when I can, it's far different from complaining.
Additionally, this right here has NOTHING to do with complaining, it's me wondering about the relevance to the SITE, not my personal interests.
Quiet down.

Comment. Not complain. Though judging by that reaction, either works.

I love how Twilight and Rainbow Dash have itty-bitty cocks compared to the others.

-Frazzledragon said:
Whiny stuff

Apparently you missed 10 pages of approved humanized MLP.

-Frazzledragon said:
That is wrong.
Images of human-ponies have been deleted before because they were simply human, with only minor resemblance of the inspiration character.

"Topic relevance

Is the post furry or otherwise anthropomorphic? If not, the post falls outside of e621's core purview, and may be deleted without warning"
This is fully humanized, no more furry resemblance.

And take careful note, I am not saying that all of them get deleted.

You are gravely mistaken about what I do. I try my best to give proper critique when I can, it's far different from complaining.
Additionally, this right here has NOTHING to do with complaining, it's me wondering about the relevance to the SITE, not my personal interests.
Quiet down.

Well, they are not fully human. They have wings and horns. So basically no humans? I guess?

StarchaserKD said:
Apparently you missed 10 pages of approved humanized MLP.

-Frazzledragon said:

And take careful note, I am not saying that all of them get deleted.

Sorry that you can't be bothered to read the entire text.

Can't we all stop arguing and just enjoy the porn

LinkIsAwesome117 said:
Can't we all stop arguing and just enjoy the porn

I have no idea why would anyone argue on the image for "Humanized" Character's and the rules.

-Frazzledragon said:
I think this is too far to still be site relevant.

Allow me to tell you exactly what I've been told by admins before - Whether something is relevant or not is completely up to which ever mod/admin gets to it first.

It's a complete crapshoot. That's just how it is and always has been.

AnotherDay said:
Allow me to tell you exactly what I've been told by admins before - Whether something is relevant or not is completely up to which ever mod/admin gets to it first.

It's a complete crapshoot. That's just how it is and always has been.

Go back to your mother basement.
You're infectious.

-Frazzledragon said:
Sorry that you can't be bothered to read the entire text.

Get out.

Dwicky said:
Go back to your mother basement.
You're infectious.

Dwicky said:
Get out.

Are you trying to get banned?

well, they do have horns and wings (fluttershy, rainbow dash, rarity, and twilight do anyway) but in the case of earth ponies like pinkie and AJ, i can't help but think that's pushing the no-human rule a bit far since look like normal humans with no animal aspects at all.

it wasn't too long ago that i saw a pic of humanized AJ with nothing more than a disembodied horecock in it. other than that it didn't have anything furry in it from what i could tell and it did wind up deleted iirc.

i can't help but think that's pushing the no-human rule a bit far since earth ponies look like normal humans with no animal aspects at all.

too late to edit

treos said:

it wasn't too long ago that i saw a pic of humanized AJ with nothing more than a disembodied horecock in it. other than that it didn't have anything furry in it from what i could tell and it did wind up deleted iirc.

Yeah that one got deleted; if it wasn't just a poorly done edit it would have probably been okay.

As for the no-human rule, this kind of rides on the very edge of human in the same way that some kemomomimi ("animal ears") does and those are always a touch call. The wings and horn do make this relevant enough for the site though, even if just barely.

Ok sooo...
I see that this is one of those posts that have serious discussions on them, or something. But I just wanted to say:
LOL! @ Twilights futa-tool!