You must be over the age of 18 and agree
to the terms of service to access this page.
By default a limited blacklist has been applied hiding content that is commonly objected to. You may remove
items from this blacklist by using the blacklist menu item.
tubeku
Member10708x10009.... really are you going for the largest picture award on this site...
SnugglesArts
Member75,5mb that would take me 30 minutes to download :O
Mauser98k
Memberim afraid to click on a whitemaverick pic, my computer might crash
user 59725
Memberhttp://i.imgur.com/CT0B9QT.png
:|
Casserole2025
Memberwhat are you on American internet
user 59725
Member> American
> Using comma to mark decimal place
bnuuybro
BlockedWhat's this, e621 for cinema screens?
CraX
MemberInb4 someone hides a 1TB RAR in a jpeg.
Also, JESUS FUCK THIS SIZE AND RES
Chessax
PrivilegedNice, though didn't quite get the "Ten. Seconds. Flat." from the artist.
Rant
Even a maximum quality JPEG would be smaller than this with only marginal quality loss and a high quality JPEG 10 times smaller. When people complain about size I usually go: "Meh, bigger is better!". Most absurd_res doesn't bother me at all, however superabsurd_res and especially this makes me start to think. Sure, it's great if you wanna print a poster (though a vector format would be more manageable and probably under 1 MB). And this particular subject is not really suitable for simply ogling in a browser... That said, I guess it's better than low_res.
user 247050
Membermy monitor isnt as big as my tv
onoMiihsulP
Memberscreen size doesnt matter, its the resolution
MyNameIsOver20charac
MemberMy porn is aproximatly 1.47 times as tall as me :/
REKDiT
Memberthanks for making me go over my data limit. lol
Login to respond »