Besides the knot-on-a-balloon nipples, dem are some nice tits.

Nobody ever thinks to add the "Hyper" tag. *sigh*

*adds*

Fluffytiger said:
Besides the knot-on-a-balloon nipples, dem are some nice tits.

oh i so have to agree with you on that, I want to do everything to them c:

Burninghart said:
Nobody ever thinks to add the "Hyper" tag. *sigh*

*adds*

And removed. Those are hardly 'hyper' level titties, merely big. Try looking at girls over 8 years old plz.

Chemico said:
And removed. Those are hardly 'hyper' level titties, merely big. Try looking at girls over 8 years old plz.

Obviously you have never seen a real, NORMAL, pair of breasts. If this is not hyper, then it's TREMENDOUSLY oversized... which still counts as Hyper.

Of course, if you wish to live in your own little fantasy world where all breasts are the size of canteloupes or watermelons, then who am I to stop you? All I ask is that you get laid someday.

Now, I shall be re-adding the "Hyper" tag, thank you very much. *adds*

Burninghart said:
Obviously you have never seen a real, NORMAL, pair of breasts. If this is not hyper, then it's TREMENDOUSLY oversized... which still counts as Hyper.

Of course, if you wish to live in your own little fantasy world where all breasts are the size of canteloupes or watermelons, then who am I to stop you? All I ask is that you get laid someday.

Now, I shall be re-adding the "Hyper" tag, thank you very much. *adds*

Hmm, looking back on this post, in hindsight I guess that Bowling Balls would've been a better comparison than canteloupes. Ah well.

Burninghart said:
Obviously you have never seen a real, NORMAL, pair of breasts. If this is not hyper, then it's TREMENDOUSLY oversized... which still counts as Hyper.

Of course, if you wish to live in your own little fantasy world where all breasts are the size of canteloupes or watermelons, then who am I to stop you? All I ask is that you get laid someday.

Now, I shall be re-adding the "Hyper" tag, thank you very much. *adds*

Haha, so true.

Eh, I think it's border-line. My extremely-rough rules of thumb for hyper are a. "Could the figure actually support the weight?" and b. "Would blood flow to the enlarged region cause them to quickly die/pass out?"

Since the answers here are "Yes, just barely" and "Probably not," I'd call it extreme stylistic exaggeration rather than hyper. But whatever. Hot pic regardless.

Liquid_Chameleon said:
Eh, I think it's border-line. My extremely-rough rules of thumb for hyper are a. "Could the figure actually support the weight?" and b. "Would blood flow to the enlarged region cause them to quickly die/pass out?"

Since the answers here are "Yes, just barely" and "Probably not," I'd call it extreme stylistic exaggeration rather than hyper. But whatever. Hot pic regardless.

This is reasonable, and I agree.

Burninghart said:
Obviously you have never seen a real, NORMAL, pair of breasts. If this is not hyper, then it's TREMENDOUSLY oversized... which still counts as Hyper.

Of course, if you wish to live in your own little fantasy world where all breasts are the size of canteloupes or watermelons, then who am I to stop you? All I ask is that you get laid someday.

Now, I shall be re-adding the "Hyper" tag, thank you very much. *adds*

Nice = )

You're cute. I've seen high school girls with tits bigger than this.

Have to agree, the rack is not out of line with where I reckon the hips are going. Hyper is inappropriate in this case.

Those of you hating on Chemico need to step off and realize not all women are - or should be - goddamn toothpicks. "...real, NORMAL, pair of breasts." Oh that's fucking hilarious. That's rich, son. You either need to increase your sample size - so to speak - or, preferably, just grow up and shut the fuck up. Just because your preference may be for women who have (pre)teen bumps for boobs, doesn't mean they all do.

And: "All I ask is that you get laid someday." Really? _Really_? Maybe he has - just not with a beanpole or a kid.

I'd say her head is too small, rather than her breasts are hyper. Looking from the neck down, the proportions are pretty doable, but along with her small head I think it looks weird, and that's probably what puts people off. A regular "rule" is that the breasts can be considered hyper if they are larger than the person's head, which these are. But again, small head on big body...

http://www.stileproject.com/videos/23076/the-biggest-tits-ever.html this hyper. >.>

Based on the fact that there's this: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xbqxy2_milena-velba-after-the-party_sexy in real life, and her boobs are natural, I'd say this post isn't hyper.

dragonlover91 said:
http://www.stileproject.com/videos/23076/the-biggest-tits-ever.html this hyper. >.>

Those are some very fake breasts. Watch out they might poke your eyes out!

Burninghart said:
Obviously you have never seen a real, NORMAL, pair of breasts. If this is not hyper, then it's TREMENDOUSLY oversized... which still counts as Hyper.

Of course, if you wish to live in your own little fantasy world where all breasts are the size of canteloupes or watermelons, then who am I to stop you? All I ask is that you get laid someday.

Now, I shall be re-adding the "Hyper" tag, thank you very much. *adds*

I wouldn't even consider this Hyper, in fact these breasts seems to be a bit over Double D cup size in otherwords somewhere along the E Cup size. The largest non-fake and non-hyper breasts are Double E 40 (If I remember corretly).
Those who is considered "Hyoer" goes beond that in a unhealthy manner. The Hyper for a male can be a guy which has Elephantism (Their balls are huge so they can't even wear pants). So this is not even barely close to hyper, in my opinion at least.

"Hypertrophilia, also known as hypersexuality, is used to describe some (especially macrophilic) people's attraction -- emotionally and/or sexually -- to hyper-endowed characters, or characters represented in any medium with over-exaggerated (i.e. impractically-large) erogenous areas or sexual characteristics."

While her body shape/size suggests that yes she could support larger-than-normal breasts, the fact that her head is smaller than either of them illustrates that they are in fact hyper, as they are overly exaggerated and impractically large.

Regardless of whether or not a living person can have them naturally that large, overly large like that is still hyper. As for "non hyper" as posted above by Narji, A 40EE would be properly labelled 40F, which is in other words actually a 40DDD. That is definitely hyper levels of size.

Also, something I forgot to mention: While it may be hyper, it's still on the lower scale. Just because when you think hyper you immediately think the giant balloon breasts and cocks as big as a man, doesn't mean that the lower end isn't tame in comparison.

This is not hyper, it only appears so because the focus of the picture is her breasts. If it were a full body shot to see her entire frame as hinted by the artist in this picture, her breasts would be just really big.

I still argue that her head is much too small in relation to the body. Hence this optical illusion. Compared to her head, the tits are hyper, but not relative to her torso.

RudeBoy said:
I still argue that her head is much too small in relation to the body. Hence this optical illusion. Compared to her head, the tits are hyper, but not relative to her torso.

This.

This whole argument is hilarious XD

For the record, "Hyper" generally tends to mean impossibly large. While those breasts are far larger than what's considered average, I have known some rather overweight women to have breasts that size or larger. My own step-sister is a size H now, for example.

So while I was tempted to say "Fuck yes, that's hyper, you all are a bunch of idiots", for once I'd have to agree that it's not.

its remind me lets eat series...