gene wilder and willy wonka (willy wonka and the chocolate factory and etc) created by tassy (artist)
Description

Cool story bro. ~

Just a quick pic I made while practicing with memes and expressions, it was fun to do. X3

  • Comments
  • Thekingofcrocodiles said:
    Makes enough sense to me.

    Faeberry said:
    Willy Wonka as a female tiger? wat.

    ok so how is this female? you see the tiger from the shoulders up! im just really confused how you came to this conclusion

  • Reply
  • |
  • -6
  • sonicblade13 said:
    ok so how is this female? you see the tiger from the shoulders up! im just really confused how you came to this conclusion

    They think that long hair = female, apparently.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • Oh, you think Star Wars The Force Awakens will ruin the franchise? Remind me how Episodes I-III are the greatest movies ever made.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • sonicblade13 said:
    ok so how is this female? you see the tiger from the shoulders up! im just really confused how you came to this conclusion

    haxxx said:
    They think that long hair = female, apparently.

    It could be because Tassy is Female. Art of her OC seems to suggest as much (though theres not alot of it).

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • sonicblade13 said:
    ok so how is this female? you see the tiger from the shoulders up! im just really confused how you came to this conclusion

    Tassy is the Artist's OC, and Tassy is Female.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
  • "Oh, so you think bronies are sick because they fap to horses? Please, remind me how much the furry community is against sexualizing animals."

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • sonicblade13 said:
    ok so how is this female? you see the tiger from the shoulders up! im just really confused how you came to this conclusion

    haxxx said:
    They think that long hair = female, apparently.

    It looks a bit feminine. Facial structure, the way the eyes are lidded, and yes THE HAIR

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
  • Routganan said:
    "Oh so you hate furries. Tell me more on how much you fap away on this site."

    So true.

    KaiCalimatinus said:

    There is no
    Life I know
    To compare with
    Pure imagination
    Living there
    You'll be free
    If you truly
    Wish to be

    That's Beautiful.

    Lavalamplucario said:
    you think sonic lost world's lava mountain zone is unfair?
    tell me again about how perfect sonic 2 was.

    And that's why I don't play games by the modern sega.
    "So you say that the original sega sucks? Then tell me what has the modern sega ever yet accomplished."
    R.I.P. Sega 1887-2002.

    OrcaMan1 said:
    "So you hate furries? Tell me again how your "SWAG" has raised money for Charity..."

    Lol.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • Syderen said:

    1887-2002.

    *ahem* Such a long run.

    The Dreamcast was a great console, just too far ahead of its time. Besides, aren't they still acting as a software publisher?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Jade_Anthelion said:
    *ahem* Such a long run.

    The Dreamcast was a great console, just too far ahead of its time. Besides, aren't they still acting as a software publisher?

    I think the modern one does. Last I heard some original SEGA staff were offered jobs in Germany.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • The_Soldier said:
    Oh, you think Star Wars The Force Awakens will ruin the franchise? Remind me how Episodes I-III are the greatest movies ever made.

    At least episodes I-III were original.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • MariaDevita said:
    IV-VI were THE originals.

    Of course, but unlike Force Awakens, the plots to episodes I-III were original, Force Awakens is just a rehash of Episode IV. And it stole major plot elements from the expanded universe, which Disney said was no longer canon! You don't fucking do that!

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • Dakota_the_Fox said:
    Of course, but unlike Force Awakens, the plots to episodes I-III were original, Force Awakens is just a rehash of Episode IV. And it stole major plot elements from the expanded universe, which Disney said was no longer canon! You don't fucking do that!

    But if you think about it, episodes IV-VI came before I-III. So I don't see how they did take elements from episode IV. And also, even though Fisney said it wasn't canon, people do change their minds! Which is probably what happened.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • sonicblade13 said:
    ok so how is this female? you see the tiger from the shoulders up! im just really confused how you came to this conclusion

    haxxx said:
    They think that long hair = female, apparently.

    Thekingofcrocodiles said:
    It could be because Tassy is Female. Art of her OC seems to suggest as much (though theres not alot of it).

    machin666ma said:
    Tassy is the Artist's OC, and Tassy is Female.

    Jason118 said:
    It looks a bit feminine. Facial structure, the way the eyes are lidded, and yes THE HAIR

    Acton98 said:

    Finally someone gets it.

    Tag what you see, not what you know.
    I see no boobies therefore, by the rules of the site, it's ambiguous

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • “Oh, so you think .410 Flechette conversion on RPK74 is a bad idea?”
    “Tell me how you found this Furry site.”

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Me-"Explains how calling Anthros furries, animals or animals with Human traits is ignorant"
    Him-"Makes the I Don't Care face"

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1