To repeat my comment from the deleted post:

Didn't realize how fucking big the file was. Switching it out with a more reasonable size

Why would you?
A bigger file size is always preferred when the picture actually contains more information (which is the case in this one).

Calimero000 said

There are pictures that benefit from the increased file size and there are some that don't. My style is generally sketchy and doesn't provide the small details needed to benefit from insane 3000x3000 resolution. This goes into the look too closely and you break the illusion. Also when I used to use my ipod for this site anything above 2000x2000 took forever to load and anything over 3000x2000, this is just an estimate btw, wouldn't load and/or crashed it and I would have to reset it. Damn you furryrachet haha. Plus it was just over excessive. I still think this is too big and the previous size was more than twice as big.