messerschmitt created by rajii
Viewing sample resized to 47% of original (view original) Loading...
Description

Messerschmitt Me-262 "Misserschmitt"
''Inspired by THIS photo''

  • Comments
  • I must be jaded by the internet. I more noticed the anomalous post-WW2 German flag under the horizontal stabilizer than the fact that a Me-262 is a) anthropoorphized, and b) presenting its ass to me in an invitation.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 15
  • Sniffeh said:
    I hope this is the last time he draws something like this.
    I don't care to see retarded bullshit like this in my inbox.

    get over it

  • Reply
  • |
  • 28
  • Sniffeh said:
    I hope this is the last time he draws something like this.
    I don't care to see retarded bullshit like this in my inbox.

    *whispers* blacklist

  • Reply
  • |
  • 18
  • Imagine her sitting on you .....
    FOR REAL THAT'S THE ONLY REASON SHE'S SMILING AT YOU
    she probably wants a different type of fuel

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • If this was Raji's last drawing, you'd have a new drawing to look at every day for a year except a leap year like 2016.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Sniffeh said:
    Were you one of the people who reported me? Since when am I not allowed to voice my opinion? How is me saying something negative about something any less valid than someone saying something positive? Its still an opinion. So if I can be banned for 7 days because I said I didn't like something on here then logically the admins should be banning people for saying they like something. Its only fair.

    are... you aware that you can state your opinion without being a complete asshole? there is big difference between "this is shit and the artist should feel bad" and "i do not really like this content". this is something they teach to little children and grown adults like you should know these things.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 19
  • in case it was unclear, you were not banned for stating your opinion. you were banned for being an asshole.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 14
  • Sniffeh said:
    Were you one of the people who reported me? Since when am I not allowed to voice my opinion? How is me saying something negative about something any less valid than someone saying something positive? Its still an opinion. So if I can be banned for 7 days because I said I didn't like something on here then logically the admins should be banning people for saying they like something. Its only fair.

    Sniffeh said:
    Apparently voicing your opinion about art is a bannable offense on e621.net. Stay classy admins.

    You're just digging yourself a deeper hole. You can just use the Blacklist tool and make everything much easier.
    I mean right now you are looking at "Refusal to use Blacklist" (as it has been suggested and made available to you) and "Disregard of the Site Administration" (as the admins have already warned you previously).

  • Reply
  • |
  • 7
  • Sniffeh said:

    Were you one of the people who reported me?

    i might have been. tbh i do no not remember and i do not feel like going through my old reports to see if i did.
    anyways you should probably chill a bit and maybe take a moment to look at your own behavior. i do not really think that expecting decent behavior from someone does not make one "oversensitive baby".
    also yes, you have right to voice your opinion but you do not have right to shit on other people. as i said earlier, you can speak your mind without being an ass.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 7
  • Sniffeh said:
    When did I shit on other people? Have I insulted anyone in the comments of this submission? Because as far as I know I haven't.

    But you've left 8 different argumentative comments on it. If it were one comment, it would be fine, people can have opinions. But you kept going, which is why we intervened. Now you are witch-hunting trying to find who reported you and are drawing out drama that should have ended a long time ago. If you continue to comment on this image you will be banned, along with your other account you just made. Enough is enough.

    EDIT: Disregard the remark about the other account, must have been a glitch with our IP system.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 6
  • ippiki_ookami said:
    But you've left 8 different argumentative comments on it. If it were one comment, it would be fine, people can have opinions. But you kept going, which is why we intervened. Now you are witch-hunting trying to find who reported you and are drawing out drama that should have ended a long time ago. If you continue to comment on this image you will be banned, along with your other account you just made. Enough is enough.

    I'm upset because I feel like I am being singled out for things that I see people do on this site all the time. When
    a mod reprimands me for something they allowed another user
    to get away with that isn't fair.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -8
  • ippiki_ookami said:
    But you've left 8 different argumentative comments on it. If it were one comment, it would be fine, people can have opinions. But you kept going, which is why we intervened. Now you are witch-hunting trying to find who reported you and are drawing out drama that should have ended a long time ago. If you continue to comment on this image you will be banned, along with your other account you just made. Enough is enough.

    What about all those times I got into heated discussions over Hardiman's art on here? Did a mod ever once tell me to stop? No. Did anyone on those submissions get told to stop? No. Hell Hardiman deliberately goaded his haters in the comments and no one said anything to him. So why all of a sudden is it an issue?

  • Reply
  • |
  • -5
  • Sniffeh said:
    What about all those times I got into heated discussions over Hardiman's art on here? Did a mod ever once tell me to stop? No. Did anyone on those submissions get told to stop? No. Hell Hardiman deliberately goaded his haters in the comments and no one said anything to him. So why all of a sudden is it an issue?

    Well, you're being told to stop now. So you might as well listen.
    Either way, you're always trying to cause drama, and that's not what this site is for. If you really must know, I've reported you, because I'm fed up with seeing you all negative or causing drama all over this site.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • sai_jay said:
    Well, you're being told to stop now. So you might as well listen.
    Either way, you're always trying to cause drama, and that's not what this site is for. If you really must know, I've reported you, because I'm fed up with seeing you all negative or causing drama all over this site.

    Wait. What? I haven't even talked to you in like 7 months.
    How are you going to just come up into this thread and accuse
    me of stuff when theres been zero involvement on your part?
    What are you trying to bait me? How exactly is reporting me then
    coming here to tell me you reported me not starting drama?
    I've done nothing to you or anyone in this thread. Theres
    nothing to report. Unless theres a new rule that says "Sniff Heinkel is no longer permitted to leave comments" you're just being a snitch.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -6
  • Sniffeh said:
    Wait. What? I haven't even talked to you in like 7 months.
    How are you going to just come up into this thread and accuse
    me of stuff when theres been zero involvement on your part?
    What are you trying to bait me? How exactly is reporting me then
    coming here to tell me you reported me not starting drama?
    I've done nothing to you or anyone in this thread. Theres
    nothing to report. Unless theres a new rule that says "Sniff Heinkel is no longer permitted to leave comments" you're just being a snitch.

    Well, first off, calling me a "snitch" implies that you were in fact doing something you shouldn't have been doing and I reported you for it.
    Second, if you go through all of your comments: https://e621.net/comment/search?query=user%3ASniffeh You can see that you have been starting drama in on other images as well.
    I'm not trying to start drama with you, you were asking who reported you, so, to stop your witch hunt, I let you know that I did.

    It's not so much that you're trying to voice your opinion, it's just the way you do it. Simply stating that you don't like something would be enough, but taking the extra step and saying that the artist should be ashamed or saying that something is "retarded bullshit" is a bit much. Even more so that you had to leave multiple comments on this one image just to say these things.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 4
  • sai_jay said:
    Well, first off, calling me a "snitch" implies that you were in fact doing something you shouldn't have been doing and I reported you for it.
    Second, if you go through all of your comments: https://e621.net/comment/search?query=user%3ASniffeh You can see that you have been starting drama in on other images as well.
    I'm not trying to start drama with you, you were asking who reported you, so, to stop your witch hunt, I let you know that I did.

    It's not so much that you're trying to voice your opinion, it's just the way you do it. Simply stating that you don't like something would be enough, but taking the extra step and saying that the artist should be ashamed or saying that something is "retarded bullshit" is a bit much. Even more so that you had to leave multiple comments on this one image just to say these things.

    Which comments specifically do you think I was starting drama over? Because most of those are from images I posted of an artist who is friends with me. In one comment to him I said "You know you enjoyed the drama" as a joke. I suppose if you weren't aware that me and Arkbeast were friends you might assume I was trolling him. I mean other than that one comment'which can be misconstrued I don't see me leaving any antagonistic replies (not counting the 2 comments I left on this submission).

    Also, why do you even care what I say? Why would you come out of the wood work 7 months after our last encounter to accuse me of causing drama? Do you have some kind of grudge with me or are you doing it just for the "lulz"? Seems to me like you aren't doing this so much to stem drama as to stir it up.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -6
  • Sniffeh said:
    What about all those times I got into heated discussions over Hardiman's art on here? Did a mod ever once tell me to stop? No. Did anyone on those submissions get told to stop? No. Hell Hardiman deliberately goaded his haters in the comments and no one said anything to him. So why all of a sudden is it an issue?

    If you read the Code of Conduct you'll see that its outlined under Spamming or Trolling: If no one complains or gets offended, AND it’s not an outwardly offensive remark, then it will be okay. However, if someone complains, gets offended, OR it’s an outwardly offensive remark (I think EDFDarkAngel1 is an asshole and should be shot), then they need to be flagged.
    So basically your continued need to be the center of attention is getting you in trouble. You have been warned repeatedly.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • Pasiphaë said:
    If you read the Code of Conduct you'll see that its outlined under Spamming or Trolling: If no one complains or gets offended, AND it’s not an outwardly offensive remark, then it will be okay. However, if someone complains, gets offended, OR it’s an outwardly offensive remark (I think EDFDarkAngel1 is an asshole and should be shot), then they need to be flagged.
    So basically your continued need to be the center of attention is getting you in trouble. You have been warned repeatedly.

    Yes. I am posting just because I am so full of myself that I need the entire sites attention. Thats sarcasm in case you didn't know.
    As I was just saying in a journal if you search "james_m_hardiman" and look at the comments on his pictures you will see that people were accusing him of being a secret pedophile and calling his art trash and outdated. Some people even went as far as to alter his images to make it appear he drew cub porn. This went on for years and never once did any admins on this site intervene. So its okay to harass an artist for years, but if I say I think something is shit then I am breaking the site rules? Someone please explain this to me.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -6
  • Sniffeh said:
    So I'm not allowed to have a discussion on this post? Because thats what it sounds like you are telling me. Also Dave told me that it is not mandatory to use the blacklist function. If anyone cares to dispute me on this I kept all his email as proof.

    I hope this is the last time he draws something like this.
    I don't care to see retarded bullshit like this in my inbox.

    This is shit and Rajii should feel bad.

    The last two comments are your original comments that began the drama. Those types of comments are not allowed here because they fall under the category in the Code of Conduct called "Refusal to Use Blacklist". The blacklist is not required for anyone, but if you encounter an image you are not fond of and do not wish to blacklist it then you are not entitled to then leave comments like the first 2 you left in this thread that started this all. Its spelled out for you in the Code of Conduct quite clearly: If a user chooses, or refuses, to utilize the blacklist, but continues to complain about content they find offensive or unsatisfactory, then this rule may be enforced.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • Pasiphaë said:
    The last two comments are your original comments that began the drama. Those types of comments are not allowed here because they fall under the category in the Code of Conduct called "Refusal to Use Blacklist". The blacklist is not required for anyone, but if you encounter an image you are not fond of and do not wish to blacklist it then you are not entitled to then leave comments like the first 2 you left in this thread that started this all. Its spelled out for you in the Code of Conduct quite clearly: If a user chooses, or refuses, to utilize the blacklist, but continues to complain about content they find offensive or unsatisfactory, then this rule may be enforced.

    And it was. Whats your point? I got banned for 7 days and I stopped leaving comments like that. I still think its wrong to censor peoples opinions no matter how negative it may appear but rules are rules. Believe it or not
    I actually do not want to be banned.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -5
  • sniffeh said:
    Were you one of the people who reported me? Since when am I not allowed to voice my opinion? How is me saying something negative about something any less valid than someone saying something positive? Its still an opinion. So if I can be banned for 7 days because I said I didn't like something on here then logically the admins should be banning people for saying they like something. Its only fair.

    Yeah you aint allowed, shut the fuck up

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2