twilight sparkle (friendship is magic and etc) created by incorgnito, jaxonian, and os
Viewing sample resized to 34% of original (view original) Loading...
Parent: post #719362 (learn more) show »
Description

So many pictures are ruined because of basics of anatomy so I made this for make it as clear as possible.
If you think I made some mistakes let me know in comments.

  • Comments
  • Brayburned said:
    Keep in mind that none of the artists featured on this website will actually try to use this to improve. :P

    Then if you'll see the obvious fuckup on artist's picture, you can send him comment with this "post #719530" :-P

  • Reply
  • |
  • -9
  • horse vaginal entrence is closer to the clit thats a human vagina diagram at least thats what i think and if im incorrect im sorry for questioning u

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • happysadface said:
    ...and if im incorrect im sorry for questioning u

    There is nothing wrong about questioning something.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • I have noticed pelves being ignored by many artists. On a semi related note, did you know that the plural of pelvis is pelves?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • great... another person who thinks that anatomical correctness is more relevant than artist style, artist perspective, fetish, aesthetic preference, and suspension of realism. You know there was a user by the name of katlarv who insisted that non-anatomically-correct horse vaginas meant the art was bad quality... no one liked him... DONT END UP LIKE KATLARV

  • Reply
  • |
  • -9
  • Qthedude said:
    ...did you know that the plural of pelvis is pelves?

    Because english is not my main language I didn't know about that (or maybe heard about it but didn't remember). Thanks for the information!

    truthbetold said:
    great... another person who thinks that anatomical correctness is more relevant than artist style, artist perspective, fetish, aesthetic preference, and suspension of realism.. ..DONT END UP LIKE KATLARV

    Iam so glad someone has the same opinion as me!
    I don't care how I will end up, I just can't enjoy something if I know it doesn't work that way or just doesn't make sense. I rather end up like some katlarv than be silent about the fact.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • >Clearly slav name
    >Rarispike uploads
    I'm quite sure that I know you, just wondering why you didn't use your formerly english nickname here.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • crystalshine said:
    >Clearly slav name
    >Rarispike uploads
    I'm quite sure that I know you, just wondering why you didn't use your formerly english nickname here.

    I guess it was taken. And who are you? :-P

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • FloridaCracker said:
    >How furries think vaginas work
    Maximus Kekius.

    now we need one on dicks.
    Last time I checked dicks shouldn't be bigger than the person they were trying to enter.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
  • Thank you for this! The more we aid our artists and help them improve, the more we get out of the art they make! Sounds selfish when I phrase it that way, but of course they benefit a lot too.

    truthbetold said:
    DONT END UP LIKE KATLARV

    I used to like Kattlarv, but he was more than a simple critic. He was very stubborn on vaginas, and I think he let his fetishes bleed into his idea of what one should look like.

    All good things can be corrupted, but we should not then fear the good thing. That good thing here is good anatomy. As well as generally giving advice to artists. The amount of flak you get these days trying to help someone out is depressing.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 4
  • I think what screws up this tutorial is the fact that it targets an entire group of people with the "How furries think vagina's work."

    It's kind of a stab honestly. Maybe a little rude, considering there are some of us who do know how vaginas work. Perhaps you could have simply said "Correct/ incorrect insertion points." and left it at that. I, for one, dislike when someone assumes I think a certain way.

    Not saying the tutorial is wrong though, far from that... it might need to be presented with a little more tact, and a less discriminatory tone.

    Just my two-cents.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • Malikfoxen said:
    I think what screws up this tutorial is the fact that it targets an entire group of people with the "How furries think vagina's work."

    It's kind of a stab honestly. Maybe a little rude, considering there are some of us who do know how vaginas work. Perhaps you could have simply said "Correct/ incorrect insertion points." and left it at that. I, for one, dislike when someone assumes I think a certain way.

    Not saying the tutorial is wrong though, far from that... it might need to be presented with a little more tact, and a less discriminatory tone.

    Just my two-cents.

    the "How furries think vagina's work." is from this guy post #719362 so write about stabbing to him.

    If you know how vaginas work then it is good for you, but most of artists makes those flaws that needs to be told about.
    I don't see discrimination you're talking about, more like a bit of sarcasm and joke. I mean come on, a pussy like a universe is pretty funny.
    If the sentence will say "how people thinks..." you wouldn't see anything wrong about it; Does it mean you are the one who discriminate?

    More tact will also mean less give a crap about it; And the fact you had to put the two cents about just proves it.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Kakkarot said:
    so this is basically a guide to fuck horse pussy since horses and humans are a bit different.

    There are also antro examples, not only horses. All mammals are different yet they have similarities. That is the point of the post.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Drakodlak said:
    the "How furries think vagina's work." is from this guy post #719362 so write about stabbing to him.

    If you know how vaginas work then it is good for you, but most of artists makes those flaws that needs to be told about.
    I don't see discrimination you're talking about, more like a bit of sarcasm and joke. I mean come on, a pussy like a universe is pretty funny.
    If the sentence will say "how people thinks..." you wouldn't see anything wrong about it; Does it mean you are the one who discriminate?

    More tact will also mean less give a crap about it; And the fact you had to put the two cents about just proves it.

    Looks like a stallion's rage war over how pussy's actually work, woah woah calm the fuck down

    You need a mare to sort this one out. Lucky one has just arrived

    Guides good, you can't just shove you're whole dick up there. Well you can but she won't be too happy about it and will end up kicking u in the face, or you take a horn to the eye. It cant be larger then the hole your shoving in it either, since the mare will go elsewhere, you won't be fitting that in there.

    why you think stallions got such large cocks? They can only fit around half of it in when ontop, you ever seen a mare on her back because I've not.

    [no smart comment here linking to some porn of somepony on her back taking a whole dick, since that's not real, no linking my profile pic either since i'm a hypocrite too and thats the best damn pic of mare on mare action]

    Malikfoxen said:
    I think what screws up this tutorial is the fact that it targets an entire group of people with the "How furries think vagina's work."

    It's kind of a stab honestly. Maybe a little rude, considering there are some of us who do know how vaginas work. Perhaps you could have simply said "Correct/ incorrect insertion points." and left it at that. I, for one, dislike when someone assumes I think a certain way.

    Not saying the tutorial is wrong though, far from that... it might need to be presented with a little more tact, and a less discriminatory tone.

    Just my two-cents.

    Everyone's a critic.

    Oh and yeah

    I like to Necro Post

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • Rhythm/Night_Shade said:
    "you can't just shove you're whole dick up there."
    "It cant be larger then the hole your shoving in it either."

    Wow; Really?! Ok, You can not just shove you are whole dick up there indeed. I really don't want to be a grammar nazi, but this is a thing I'll never understand.

    Rhythm/Night_Shade said:
    ...woah calm the fuck down... They can only fit around half of it in when ontop...

    Iam cool, bro. Some of those guys not tho for they don't like to point out their ignorance. And I hope you're not explaining this to me but them.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • Not everything has to be completely anotomically correct, though.

    I do draw the line at when someone tries to fit a 50-meter dick in a normal sized person, that's just a no.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • it's a little disappointing to realize that the majority of the art work on this site simply cannot be tagged with "anatomically correct".

    I enjoy many of these art pieces, however, with no consideration given to anatomical correctness. One must, after all, accept that since the majority f the images on this site are of fictional entities, alternative evolution trees are possible. Nevertheless, the idea of a creature with an otherwise nearly human skeletal structure not having a pelvic arch is... unsettling.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • The amount of salt in this comment section could be enough to create a brand new ocean, when did we all collectively decide the value and creative personality of an artists work were second to perfected anatomy? I know there are some damn good pieces of art that are perfected anatomically but to get mad at someone just because they personally see anatomy as a suggestion compared to the art piece they wanna make is just selfish and rude. I personally don't even bother with anatomy any time im drawingna character. Yeah, their over all design can easily fit regular human anatomy, but I genuinely just use basic shapes for a pose and then create whatever I feel like. I don't take extera time to think "hmm, her figure is a but to comically proportioned" because that's the reason I drew it that way. Art is subjective, everyone's a critique and I don't have the energy to dwell on this childish argument any longer.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0