Artists that are far, far better than you do not use a watermark.

Let that sink in.

Pumpkin Pie...mmmm.

Rags said:
Artists that are far, far better than you do not use a watermark.

Let that sink in.

Is it such an intrusive watermark that you had to make that comment? It's a pretty half-decent work compared to some of the shills who SMEAR their watermarks EVERYWHERE.

someoneelse229 said:
Is it such an intrusive watermark that you had to make that comment? It's a pretty half-decent work compared to some of the shills who SMEAR their watermarks EVERYWHERE.

Well, there's one completely over the image, and another in the corner. That's a bit excessive for average art like this.

CircusCalculator said:
Well, there's one completely over the image, and another in the corner. That's a bit excessive for average art like this.

It's not nearly as shameless as having a patreon link that takes a good 1/16th of the image. I don't see why having a link to the person's account is a problem if people want to support this person with basic gratitude.

I'm just glad that it's mostly see-through, rather than a solid object which would obscure some of the image.

you sure that's a hyena? Looks more like a wolf or mix breed fox than a actual hyena.