I admire your decision to do this instead of taking the other version down. Also, yum!

Well, i get why it was female.

I get futa and usual like it.
Only the 2x gendering on the privatparts looks... cheap.

ZombieFX said:
Well, i get why it was female.

I get futa and usual like it.
Only the 2x gendering on the privatparts looks... cheap.

Futa often (although not necessarily always) implies a hermaphroditic character - someone with both sex organs.

You're probably thinking more along the lines of a male-to-female transgender character. Sometimes called a shemale or dickgirl, they're someone who appears to be female and has fully developed breasts, but still retains their male sex organs.

Mittsies said:
Futa often (although not necessarily always) implies a hermaphroditic character - someone with both sex organs.

You're probably thinking more along the lines of a male-to-female transgender character. Sometimes called a shemale or dickgirl, they're someone who appears to be female and has fully developed breasts, but still retains their male sex organs.

That's all true, but I think he just meant to say the picture (in his opinion) was better without the balls appearing to stick to the vagina. Like, because there was only a vagina.

I can see why the artist would do that, though. Most tend to draw a bit of perineum between testes and vagina, some empty space, but that's actually an implausible thing from an anatomical standpoint since there's not enough room between most people's legs for all of this, so you then usually end up with a vaginal opening that's impractically small or creeps up too far into the anal regions.

This may look 'off' a bit, but let's face it, full-intersex anatomy is always going to be off in some way or another. It just depends on what kind of off you're most used to seeing, because your brain has probably adapted to that and doesn't see it as weird anymore.

Jugofthat said:
That's all true, but I think he just meant to say the picture (in his opinion) was better without the balls appearing to stick to the vagina. Like, because there was only a vagina.

I can see why the artist would do that, though. Most tend to draw a bit of perineum between testes and vagina, some empty space, but that's actually an implausible thing from an anatomical standpoint since there's not enough room between most people's legs for all of this, so you then usually end up with a vaginal opening that's impractically small or creeps up too far into the anal regions.

This may look 'off' a bit, but let's face it, full-intersex anatomy is always going to be off in some way or another. It just depends on what kind of off you're most used to seeing, because your brain has probably adapted to that and doesn't see it as weird anymore.

To be honest I never cared if the character was a male or female or dickgirl or herm/futa or a cuntboy. As long as it is drawn in a cute and/or sexy way I will like it :P

Zemofur said:
To be honest I never cared if the character was a male or female or dickgirl or herm/futa or a cuntboy. As long as it is drawn in a cute and/or sexy way I will like it :P

in a technical sense, cuntboys are still male, and dickgirls are still female, when talking genders

Lord_Snivy said:
in a technical sense, cuntboys are still male, and dickgirls are still female, when talking genders

True but some people dosen't seem to care.