You must be over the age of 18 and agree
to the terms of service to access this page.
By default a limited blacklist has been applied hiding content that is commonly objected to. You may remove
items from this blacklist by using the blacklist menu item.
null0010
Membersometimes i think artists draw kangaroos just to get points from the community for putting their balls in the right spot
King of Hunters
Memberindeed
Morp
MemberHey, it works.
kennetbrent
MemberUm... Males don't have pouches...
Clawstripe
JanitorWhich tells me that the artist probably didn't do much research beyond noticing where male anatomy was placed in other artist's kangaroo pictures, likes pouches, or got snarky and drew his/her take on an intersex kangaroo.
TonyCoon
Former StaffIt's a herm.
GeorgeTakei
MemberArtist originally intended it to be a male, but drew him with a pouch. But after being told males don't have pouches, he changed the tags to say 'herm'
So, yes and no on your comment.
GloomyC
BlockedThe fact is that you're all wrong.
This is a wallaby.
The picture is from bad dragon.
Seppfox
MemberOKAY GUYS
THE ROO IN QUESTION DIDN'T WANT PEOPLE TO FEEL BAD BUT
WHEN HE WAS A KID HE GOT A LAYER OF HIS FUR SLICED WHILE SOMEBODY TRIED TO SKIN HIM ALIVE, HOWEVER HE GOT AWAY AND IT JUST HEALED LIKE THAT
THERE IS NO POUCH, IT IS JUST A SMALL FLAP OF SKIN
bluebackground
BlockedRoos don't have assholes there.
Erk
BlockedYou guys sound like a bunch of little girls the way you complain about shit like you're getting paid to complain about it... I swear, honestly. if something bugs you, why can't you just shut up about it? (Yes, I'm aware of the irony here..)
bluebackground
BlockedThat's what comment boxes are for.
Shadow1474
MemberTo all of you: It's fantasy, it doesn't NEED to be anatomically correct. Go pout :3
Jane Rose
MemberLet's just settle on saying that its ok to be negative as long as its not over the top. T_T
Jane Rose
MemberTrue, but their are some people that like anatomically correct furries
Login to respond »