zaush created by zaush
Viewing sample resized to 65% of original (view original) Loading...
Children: 3 children (learn more) show »
Description

Going far beyond the call of duty, these three drink-serving employees take special care of a certain dingo on a secluded (and definitely fictional) nude beach on the island of Maui. Onlookers aren't sure wether to be shocked or inspired, though a few seem to be getting into the spirit of things, and It's likely these three will be sticking around for a while.

Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • DDSN said:
    Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes.
    Yes.

    Yay.

    Hell, why not. There's cock and balls, rimming, cum and.. that's about it. Cut out the rest and it'd still be as interesting.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Nireuru said:
    Whoever put the tag "gay" is ignorant. He shows equal love to the male, as well to the two females. How the hell is that gay?

    what about the guy rimming?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Nireuru said:
    Does that make one gay?

    Yes.

    But tagging it gay wouldn't be necessary, it's already got the bisexual tag

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • Nireuru said:
    Whoever put the tag "gay" is ignorant. He shows equal love to the male, as well to the two females. How the hell is that gay?

    Lovely picture :3

    who says he's gay? im thinking the guy on the right is gay, he cant see the other guy rimming him, just the 2 girls. and he doesnt have an erection xD pretty much gay to me

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • I spoke to zaush through furaffinity and I may have persuaded him to do some art of that cheetah couple in the back! :P

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • ....and then the rimming guy decides to stick it in his pooper, and mr.relaxation make this face : O.O (he can dish it out but still a little tight to take it)

    also, life gaurd=lol :p

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • Fauxgirl said:
    Yes.

    But tagging it gay wouldn't be necessary, it's already got the bisexual tag

    I fail to see how two guys sexually playing around does not merit a "gay" tag, irrelevant of whether or not there's a bisexual tag.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • Ecko said:
    I spoke to zaush through furaffinity and I may have persuaded him to do some art of that cheetah couple in the back! :P

    Unless you offered him triple digits it's not gonna happen. The man is a whore through and through.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • Ashyen said: I fail to see how two guys sexually playing around does not merit a "gay" tag, irrelevant of whether or not there's a bisexual tag.

    Bisexuality implies that there's going to be some homosexual and heterosexual content. Gay implies that there is only homosexual content. Therefore gay is by far misleading and incorrect. The use of a gay tag here is only justified by the crudely homophobic of varying degrees and slightly stupid. A person who engages sexually with both a male and a female at the same time is bisexual, not gay. If the scene did not involve the females, then it would be gay.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • Manin5 said:
    Unless you offered him triple digits it's not gonna happen. The man is a whore through and through.

    There is this thing called supply and demand. When someones art is really good people want it, and seeing how he can't push art out like this every day the supply is low making him charge more.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Nireuru said:
    Whoever put the tag "gay" is ignorant. He shows equal love to the male, as well to the two females. How the hell is that gay?

    Lovely picture :3

    Can you say "homophobe"? Cool your fuckin jets.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -4
  • FerrisOnFire said:
    Can you say "homophobe"? Cool your fuckin jets.

    If he was a homophobe, he wouldn't have said "Lovely Picture"

    Anyway, this is hands down Wan's best picture

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • That's just hilarious. Slave #1 likes his right foot. Slave #2 massages his left foot. Random Guy sticks his tounge up his butt.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • torayn said:

    There is this thing called supply and demand. When someones art is really good people want it, and seeing how he can't push art out like this every day the supply is low making him charge more.

    "If you're good at something, never do it for free." -Joker, "The Dark Night"

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Muse53 said:
    Bisexuality implies that there's going to be some homosexual and heterosexual content. Gay implies that there is only homosexual content. Therefore gay is by far misleading and incorrect. The use of a gay tag here is only justified by the crudely homophobic of varying degrees and slightly stupid. A person who engages sexually with both a male and a female at the same time is bisexual, not gay. If the scene did not involve the females, then it would be gay.

    http://e621.net/post?tags=gay+straight+bisexual

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1