judy hopps and nick wilde (zootopia and etc) created by justvisitingg
Parent: post #846851 (deleted) (learn more) show »
Blacklisted
(help)
  • Comments
    •
    Show all comments

    ZW

    Member

    The eye turning grey and the right (ball?) of his knot looks a little strange to me but I still love this.

    The little kisses and his toes flexing are a really nice touch.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
    •

    Metri-Reyes

    Member

    haha this great animation is finished! and its even more fuckin awesome than I thought It'd be! once again..... fuckin A

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
    •

    Runic

    Member

    luigiisawesome said:
    haha this great animation is finished! and its even more fuckin awesome than I thought It'd be! once again..... fuckin A

    Eh, I don't think this is finished yet. I wouldn't be surprised to see an update sooner or later.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
    •

    Imaderule34

    Member

    Nice! So good to have the colored version so soon :3 I love how she cleans up the precum as it slides down, nice attention to detail.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
    •

    Heuvadoches

    Member

    At first I was going to downvote because ... "OMG, another Zootopia Rule 34? What ... is that the new black or something?"

    But ... then I was treated to an exquisitely done animation and had to upvote it instead.

    *applauds* Bravo.

    (Even if it's by a majority cub artist. *yuck*)

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
    •

    Sprynt

    Blocked

    I love how she is cross eyed.
    I love that she winks before moving her head down.
    I love how the detail on Nick's fur in Judy's hand.
    I love how his toes flex from time to time.
    I love how her tail wags in the background.
    I love it loops together so perfectly.
    I love this picture.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
    •

    Ponynonymous

    Member

    To all the lazy people drawing R34 stuff of Zootopia, don't forget, they showed actual nudity in the movie. No genitals at all. Yeah, yeah, go ahead and say that it's made for kids and that's why, but still, canonically incorrect.

    I'm either going to get a lot of down votes or no votes at all. Either way, I just want Judy/Nick stuff to be… clean. I like the two of them paired together, but not like this.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -10
    •

    LethalGentleman

    Member

    Ponynonymous said:

    I'm either going to get a lot of down votes or no votes at all. Either way, I just want Judy/Nick stuff to be… clean. I like the two of them paired together, but not like this.

    You'd be better off adding 'nick_wilde judy_hopps rating:explicit' to your blacklist. That'll hide anything with Nick and Judy in the picture if they're fucking.

    There's about a half a percent chance that explicit artwork of literally anything will ever stop, which goes double for such a popular work as Zootopia; it's much easier to get on a different train instead of stopping one in motion, right?

    You don't have to see the thing, and we don't have to see your complaints in the comments.

    You were right, by the way. Congratulations.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 7
    •

    LasusNaturae

    Member

    BTM said:
    She looks like she knows what she's doing.

    As Judy once said, "rabbits are good at multiplying"

    I'm guessing rabbits know a few tricks to make the multiplying fun

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
    •

    Chessax

    Privileged

    Ponynonymous said:
    To all the lazy people drawing R34 stuff of Zootopia, don't forget, they showed actual nudity in the movie. No genitals at all. Yeah, yeah, go ahead and say that it's made for kids and that's why, but still, canonically incorrect.

    Rant

    First of all, no-one's suggesting this is canon. It's not even really implied that the two are a romantic couple. The last scene could just as well be interpreted as friendly banter. At best it's a hint for a sequel.

    Anyway... Are you suggesting the population of that world are delivered by storks? (heh). Or is there some kind of spontaneous generation going on, babies just popping up out of nowhere, and parents just come along and pick them up? Or do they use some kind of cloning process?

    They also shovel food into their mouths and drink, yet have no apparent way of disposing of any waste products. Unless it goes out the same way it goes in *shudder*. Or are you suggesting they somehow use direct mass to energy conversion. Which means they should only have to eat their body's weight of mass plus maybe an additional minuscule 3 mg for keeping the body up and running for their entire life. Maybe they're magical and don't need to eat. But then why do they have and apparently use toilets?

    Even the nudist scene works without breaking the willing suspension of disbelief, because pretty much everyone except small children would know what is going on. Sometimes in a story you can show less and have the exact same effect.

    Pretty much all of these reasons are ridiculous, it is never brought up because it wouldn't make any difference to bring it up. It is never explained and was never intended to be explained. Maybe this isn't that case but it's a common mistake to add details to a story that doesn't need to be there, either as a red herring, a chekhov's gun or something else. An engaging story almost always wins over a descriptive one.

    And most importantly: This is a rant, so don't take it too seriously.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
    •