April 10th: The bill has been vetoed!
April 2nd: The politicians in Arizona are about to sign into law a bill that would mandate sites like e621 to either impose age verification on all users or be at a risk of lawsuits. Such system would be required to go through third party vendors, who in turn must go through a government database to verify every user's age. This is not only a major violation of privacy, but it also opens up a very real danger of identity theft through phishing schemes and other methods, not to mention that we would not be able to control any of that information to make sure it is permanently deleted after age verification is complete.
Unfortunately, Arizona is the state out of which e621 operates, which means that this law will almost certainly affect us if it is to pass. If want to help us ensure that this site can continue to serve you without being required to know who you are, please ask the Arizona governor to veto this bill.
Please, help us get the word out by letting others know about this issue.
For some further information on what the bill does have a look at https://action.freespeechcoalition.com/bill/arizona-hb-2586/
We still have a Discord server, come talk to us!
Want to advertise on e621? Click here!
dracotay
BlockedNice, I like the hole 'looking through the window' thing.
CR4ZYh3r05
Memberthe only bad thing is that she looks depressed as hell.
Song
JanitorThat, or it's the infamous resting bored face. I for one definitely lapse into a light frown when deep in thought, and I wager this fox is simply thinking to himself, too.
Bakumaru
MemberShe's depressed because Flash player has crashed again.
Arachnophile
MemberDamn it, no tits. Still some great art though
NebulaFox93
MemberI love FireFox, favorite Browser :)
Bruhaha
MemberI think you mean "resting bitch face" :)
ggdk
MemberDunno - I'd consider that "melancholic" or "pensive"
sergal239
MemberThis is one of the reasons i only use fire fox...
km3333
Member"Another day, another mass-exodus of my userbase to Chrome..."
UmmNo
MemberSomeone please tell me why we are getting images from 2005. I've already seen these.
Song
JanitorThis one is an alternate, safe for work version. The two child posts are older and questionable/explicit, respectively.
AnonimousFurry
MemberIs boy
Login to respond »