Awww, he's so cute!

Huiojin2 said:
Awww, he's so cute!

Agreed.

Ed: "Pet the sergal, pet the sergal."

rubyfox said:
How is this a maleherm?

Notice her dick isn't in his ass.

Now that he has a cunt, I wouldn't mind doing him.

My friend had a dream about fucking him. In the dream, Ethan was still a maleherm.

Syderen said:
Notice her dick isn't in his ass.

that looks too low to be a pussy. looks like it's in his ass to me. see how there's lots of space between the orifice that her penis is in and his balls? that space just looks like a perineum to me. a vagina would be where the perineum is, and if what her penis is in is a vagina then it's too low, or the dick and balls are placed too high

rubyfox said:
that looks too low to be a pussy. looks like it's in his ass to me. see how there's lots of space between the orifice that her penis is in and his balls? that space just looks like a perineum to me. a vagina would be where the perineum is, and if what her penis is in is a vagina then it's too low, or the dick and balls are placed too high

It looks like his junk is just placed a bit too high.

DREEP! Take this pic, put in the blender for 45 minutes. Mmm! Smoothie so good, Guaranteed 100% genuine Ethan Teckly puh!

Syderen said:
It looks like his junk is just placed a bit too high.

Even if it were, that is way too far back to be a cunt. Were it a cunt, it would still be directly beneath the balls, because that's where cunts go, the front of the pelvis.

Look closely: http://imgur.com/a/KpfpK

If you'll notice, not only is there a clear taint (something that is taken up by a cunt on females), you can see that the curvature of his glutes (butt cheeks) goes ahead of her dick. This is anal. I am now going to fix the fucking tags.

lagreskul said:
Even if it were, that is way too far back to be a cunt. Were it a cunt, it would still be directly beneath the balls, because that's where cunts go, the front of the pelvis.

Look closely: http://imgur.com/a/KpfpK

If you'll notice, not only is there a clear taint (something that is taken up by a cunt on females), you can see that the curvature of his glutes (butt cheeks) goes ahead of her dick. This is anal. I am now going to fix the fucking tags.

That may apply to humans, but now the body size and dynamics for a sergal is different. But there has to be space for the dick to be at all times. There is understructure of the penis that many people ignore when drawings maleherms.

*Displeased about the changing of the tags*

Syderen said:
That may apply to humans, but now the body size and dynamics for a sergal is different. But there has to be space for the dick to be at all times. There is understructure of the penis that many people ignore when drawings maleherms.

Except it doesn't change anything. Sergals are built just like humans as far as the positioning of genitals go, with females having their genitals on the front of their pelvis. Girly-bits doesn't go between their butt-cheeks. Body size doesn't change anything either. A 100000000000 foot tall human that is still maintain structure somehow will still have female genitals in the front, same goes for a sergal. There's no reason to suggest this is a herm, and that penis is not going in the right spot for it to be anything but anal.

lagreskul said:
Except it doesn't change anything. Sergals are built just like humans as far as the positioning of genitals go, with females having their genitals on the front of their pelvis. Girly-bits doesn't go between their butt-cheeks. Body size doesn't change anything either. A 100000000000 foot tall human that is still maintain structure somehow will still have female genitals in the front, same goes for a sergal. There's no reason to suggest this is a herm, and that penis is not going in the right spot for it to be anything but anal.

Skeletal structure of the pelvis might be different. And even though the micro detail isn't clear, the s*hole would be a bit farther back. I built a 3d diagram yesterday to see if it was possible for a sergal maleherm to be possible. It was tricky but I was able to position all parts and it looked similar to his area.

(I know, Crazy hobby. But I've got time on my hands and with the 3d program I use, I can figure any logistic question on a virtual scale.)

Syderen said:
Skeletal structure of the pelvis might be different. And even though the micro detail isn't clear, the s*hole would be a bit farther back.

There is no reason to assume that the genitals usually positioned at the front of the sergal would suddenly reappear between the butt-cheeks. No. There is only one thing that should ever really be assumed to be back there and it is not a cunt.

Look at the zoom-in again: http://imgur.com/a/KpfpK

You can clearly see that the lower curvature of the gluteal muscles are in front of her cock. That means that her dick is clearly going between the gluteal cleft. Which, yes, sergals have them, although obstructed by a tail:
https://static1.e621.net/data/14/63/14632bc15b6691a8a1cf4f2bc27056c8.png
(I know image-to-image means little, but this is more of a proof of concept to you that even the creator of sergals imagines them with over-developed glutes for the purpose of bipedal walking. You can clearly see that sergals, too, have a humanoid shape to their gluteal body structure)

If you didn't know, the only thing that goes there is the butthole by convention. It doesn't appear all that low; the appearance of it being particularly high towards the base of the tail oftentimes is not because it actually is any higher, but because the tail is taking up a larger portion of what would be the gluteal cleft (due to tails being an extension of the spinal column). Even then, oftentimes sergals are not drawn pure to form (as with this case to a fairly high degree), which would then put this in a perfect position to be anal on an anthropomorphic sergal, as that dick is going right where the butt is on humans (towards the underside of the body, within the lower portion of the gluteal cleft), though that matters little because, once again, it's largely the same for sergals.

lagreskul said:
last comment of mine in this argument

Alas, that last "butt is on humans" should be "butthole is on humans". It's too late to edit, but I still want to be clear in what I'm arguing.

lagreskul said:
Alas, that last "butt is on humans" should be "butthole is on humans". It's too late to edit, but I still want to be clear in what I'm arguing.

Well... Just... Furry logic! Fuck! I'm just wondering who put the maleherm tag originally.