...impressive

Need moa!

Wow, somebody activated a Trap card. xD

(BTW, how can anyone tell this is a guy anyway? My eyes have yet to be trained in the art is Trap-spotting)

MiloFyre said:
Wow, somebody activated a Trap card. xD

(BTW, how can anyone tell this is a guy anyway? My eyes have yet to be trained in the art is Trap-spotting)

Because this: https://e621.net/post/show/907629/4_toes-5_fingers-animal_genitalia-animal_penis-bal

Lelantos said:
Because this: https://e621.net/post/show/907629/4_toes-5_fingers-animal_genitalia-animal_penis-bal

Oh, okay. I thought I was just bad at spotting. xD

(sigh) i wish i could look that good in a school girl uniform.

out of ever single other post on this website this one is the best ive seen yet with the realistic look and he looks like a human but a furry animal like all of us love <3. p.s im a dude

This is not a female.

I am actually a little upset that this is tagged female. And that Crossdressing, Girly, Ambiguous gender tags were all removed.

https://e621.net/post/show/907629
My character is male.

Oh my. Those sparkling eyes and that magnificent head of hair.

*sings*
I lay me down tonight
Swim in the calm tonight
This art does drown

What follows me as the whitest lace of light
Just begs to be imbrued
What follows has led me to this place

...uh hm... sorry, I'm no Davey Havok, after all.

Grey570 said:
https://e621.net/post/show/907629
My character is male.

Indeed. You know, that's actually a really good way to prove that.

Sorry.

BTW: Neat uniform!

Grey570 said:
I am actually a little upset that this is tagged female. And that Crossdressing, Girly, Ambiguous gender tags were all removed.

Sorry, I'm out of the loop with the tagging guidelines. All I know is that they're pretty well thought out. There's a ton of information on the wiki. Beyond that, I'm sure you can find help in the forums.

But you could look at it from the bright side: If it wasn't for some boys being mislabeled "female", some of us would never have discovered the beauty of that world.

Sorry, dear. I don't know if Grey will ever return, but,for lack of an EDIT function for Comments, I feel compelled to amend my last statement.

Obviously, the “prove” part is a joke. But here we have the Tag What You See policy, which is indeed well thought-out, as I recently had the occasion to ponder in thread https://e621.net/forum/show/255885, though I'm sure the topic comes up regularly. Basically, since we're dealing with the limitations of existing code, it comes down to what philosophy works best for the majority.

echo_kitsune said:
Sorry, dear. I don't know if Grey will ever return, but,for lack of an EDIT function for Comments, I feel compelled to amend my last statement.

Obviously, the “prove” part is a joke. But here we have the Tag What You See policy, which is indeed well thought-out, as I recently had the occasion to ponder in thread https://e621.net/forum/show/255885, though I'm sure the topic comes up regularly. Basically, since we're dealing with the limitations of existing code, it comes down to what philosophy works best for the majority.

I'm aware of the Tag what you see policy, and dislike it immensely. There is a girly tag, there is an ambiguous gender tag, yet despite this. A character with no breasts and no determinable gender is by default female and damn any proof otherwise. Why have either of those tags? If there are only visible dick or female genders?

You use to be able to browse trap art on E621 ever since they purged every picture with the ambiguous gender and girly tags and replaced it with female with the exception where a dick is visible e621 is crap for browsing trap art. I don't think I'll ever see how that is "effective" tagging.