ThIs sexy

This makes me like tanks much more...

daaaaaaaaammmmmmmmm mmmmmm

For Russian furries, the commander must be relaxed at all times, so every tank one of the crew members is female in order to satisfy the commanders every needs and wants to any extent. this one female crew member is often used by the rest of the crew between battles and is often pregnant or appears to be pregnant, earning them the mercy from enemy units if they are captured.

Gene_Gear said:
For Russian furries, the commander must be relaxed at all times, so every tank one of the crew members is female in order to satisfy the commanders every needs and wants to any extent. this one female crew member is often used by the rest of the crew between battles and is often pregnant or appears to be pregnant, earning them the mercy from enemy units if they are captured.

Oh that's very clever :D

Jaeson_Nightwalker said:
Oh that's very clever :D

the ones who are not pregnant will be raped and brutally murdered. so its more or less part of the job. plus, more solders for the army.

Dammit, I can't positively identify the tank, there are people in the way...

(You know you've got an obsession with warfare technology when that's your first thought upon seeing this, like it was with me. Help.)

~Wave~Length~ said:
Dammit, I can't positively identify the tank, there are people in the way...

(You know you've got an obsession with warfare technology when that's your first thought upon seeing this, like it was with me. Help.)

Its a T-62 Ural from the game Armored Warfare

Fenrick said:
Tankers don't wear visored helmets!
Hate to burst your bubble but it's a T-72 from, you know, real life.

Thing is I'm the original commissioner for the piece. And truth be told this is based around a game the sergal and I play. Sure it might be a t72 from Real Life but game reality is the basis so I think its fare to take liberties with the stuff.

I'd like to join a crew please. To help the cause of course- no other reason.

Fenrick said:
Tankers don't wear visored helmets!
Hate to burst your bubble but it's a T-72 from, you know, real life.

not a T-72, note the lack of a v-shaped splash guard on the front of the hull. its a T-62 from real life.

Possibility of a T-90?

Alright, let's figure this out once and for all.

Firstly, let's get what we can't use out of the way. The dragons can't be used for scale, as we don't know if they have some abnormal height in this world (though I'd like to note that neither of them seems to be the proper height to operate this vehicle comfortably).

Second, this is neither a T-64 nor a T-80. The frontal armor isn't heavily sloped enough; both of the vehicles mentioned have the plate sloped to roughly 70 degrees from vertical, this seems to be about 60 degrees. Additionally, as Serah Huskywolf mentioned, there isn't a V-shaped splash plate on the upper half of the glacis plate.

However, I'm also fairly sure it isn't a T-62. The nose of the hull armor seems to have almost a splash plate on it, and additionally has a triangular piece of steel linking it to the cover for the tracks. The tracks in question also extend considerably further past the front of the hull armor than on the T-62. In addition, the appearance of the tracks and the slight "notches" on top of the gun barrel don't match up.

Looking at the combination of armor sloping, track appearance, road wheels, lower plate, track covers, the headlight on the right side of the upper glacis, the notches on top of the barrel, the relation of barrel size to the rest of the tank, how far back the roof-mounted spotlight is located... I can say with relative certainty that what we have here is a T-72, some of which didn't have the V-shaped splash guard that Serah mentioned. Every aspect of this machine also matches up relatively well to a T-64, as that series also had a few machines built without the splash plate, except for the fact that the frontal plate isn't sloped far enough back, and the appearance of the track links is different.

My apologies for the text wall.