nintendo and etc created by birdsmooch
Viewing sample resized to 68% of original (view original) Loading...
Description

The artist is the uploader, and the Scraggy is not female. He's intersex.I know it's TWYS but I know what I'm tagging.

Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • S0BS said:
    Yep!

    I just wanna know who think the Scraggy is female. Sure, TWYS is a thing, but you could also check the artist's gallery to see what's the more commonly done gender. That's how I knew it was a cuntboy.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -4
  • Bane_Of_Sanity said:
    I just wanna know who think the Scraggy is female. Sure, TWYS is a thing, but you could also check the artist's gallery to see what's the more commonly done gender. That's how I knew it was a cuntboy.

    MWAH kisses for you for being a smart noodle :'3c I don't see why you have down votes. Oh well though.
    I already tagged the appropriate gender (or sex, in this case I suppose) but I'll edit it when female gets tagged. The artist is the uploader and therefore probably knows what they're doing (me.I know what I'm doing lol)

  • Reply
  • |
  • -6
  • Ratte said:
    Quit being weird.

    Keep the female tag. There is no reason to tag this a cuntboy.

    Or, you know, I'm tagging it as such because I'm the one who drew it and I drew it with the intentions of it being a cutnboy :B

  • Reply
  • |
  • -6
  • Ratte

    Former Staff

    S0BS said:
    Or, you know, I'm tagging it as such because I'm the one who drew it and I drew it with the intentions of it being a cutnboy :B

    I don't care. That isn't how our tagging system works.

    Change it back from female and you'll get a record.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 4
  • Ratte said:
    I don't care. That isn't how our tagging system works.

    Change it back from female and you'll get a record.

    Okay, fair enough, I won't re-tag it, but now I'm just simply confused.
    How come these types of debates don't come up on other cboy images, when following TWYS they could be tagged as a flat chested female?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • S0BS said:
    Okay, fair enough, I won't re-tag it, but now I'm just simply confused.
    How come these types of debates don't come up on other cboy images, when following TWYS they could be tagged as a flat chested female?

    They do happen. Just not as often as it used to. Body type standards are as follows: larger body parts, muscle tone, and "rough" body details (scars, unkept hair, etc.) are all easy ways to tell them as male. Females are quite the reverse: smaller/lithe body parts, smoother/curved skin, kept hair, makeup, etc. I emphasize that this is the easiest way to find out, not the complete list.

    For cuntboys, they need to have a male build, but with a vagina. For dickgirls, the opposite, they need a female build, but a penis and/or balls. For herms, a female's body with both pairs of genitals, and for maleherms, the reverse.

    But Pokemon are either sexually dimorphic (possessing traits that only 1 gender has, while the other does not or has another), and that's ignored; be humanoid but still only look like one entity altogether (the males and females look the same) or look feral, and lack the defining traits because they not anthros or humanoids. This is why they're female: you cannot distinguish body traits, and they only possess a pussy for sexual purposes. Mind you, this happens to the humanoid ones too: machamp can be argued Cuntboy instead of female, because of the above list.

    Your character would of been ambiguous_gender had it not have the pussy. That is the only reason why it's tagged female.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • Siral_Exan said:
    They do happen. Just not as often as it used to. Body type standards are as follows: larger body parts, muscle tone, and "rough" body details (scars, unkept hair, etc.) are all easy ways to tell them as male. Females are quite the reverse: smaller/lithe body parts, smoother/curved skin, kept hair, makeup, etc. I emphasize that this is the easiest way to find out, not the complete list.

    For cuntboys, they need to have a male build, but with a vagina. For dickgirls, the opposite, they need a female build, but a penis and/or balls. For herms, a female's body with both pairs of genitals, and for maleherms, the reverse.

    But Pokemon are either sexually dimorphic (possessing traits that only 1 gender has, while the other does not or has another), and that's ignored; be humanoid but still only look like one entity altogether (the males and females look the same) or look feral, and lack the defining traits because they not anthros or humanoids. This is why they're female: you cannot distinguish body traits, and they only possess a pussy for sexual purposes. Mind you, this happens to the humanoid ones too: machamp can be argued Cuntboy instead of female, because of the above list.

    Your character would of been ambiguous_gender had it not have the pussy. That is the only reason why it's tagged female.

    See, thank you for an actual explanation for it. It helps me with future tagging as well.
    I knew I tagged the Banette correctly as "ambiguous_gender" due to not seeing any genitals, but I guess it does make sense for the Scraggy to be tagged as female since they don't have any qualifying factors as females or males.
    The Machamp example also helps explain it so thank you again.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Siral_Eurgh-xan said:
    They do happen. Just not as often as it used to. Body type standards are as follows: larger body parts, muscle tone, and "rough" body details (scars, unkept hair, etc.) are all easy ways to tell them as male. Females are quite the reverse: smaller/lithe body parts, smoother/curved skin, kept hair, makeup, etc. I emphasize that this is the easiest way to find out, not the complete list.

    For cuntboys, they need to have a male build, but with a vagina. For dickgirls, the opposite, they need a female build, but a penis and/or balls. For herms, a female's body with both pairs of genitals, and for maleherms, the reverse.

    But Pokemon are either sexually dimorphic (possessing traits that only 1 gender has, while the other does not or has another), and that's ignored; be humanoid but still only look like one entity altogether (the males and females look the same) or look feral, and lack the defining traits because they not anthros or humanoids. This is why they're female: you cannot distinguish body traits, and they only possess a pussy for sexual purposes. Mind you, this happens to the humanoid ones too: machamp can be argued Cuntboy instead of female, because of the above list.

    Your character would of been ambiguous_gender had it not have the pussy. That is the only reason why it's tagged female.

    At the very least, this is a lot more helpful and informative than the hostility of Mr. Ratte.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0