That genitalia is kinda interesting.

man the tags were a mess. Maleherm? Rimming? Monitor_lizard? I assume the person posting the tags was making several uploads and pasted several different things and copies/pasted the tags from one to another.

Daneasaur said:
man the tags were a mess. Maleherm? Rimming? Monitor_lizard? I assume the person posting the tags was making several uploads and pasted several different things and copies/pasted the tags from one to another.

rimming was incorrect but all the other tags you nuked where correct please refrain from removing proper tags, hybrid is tagged for a reason.

Ruku said:
rimming was incorrect but all the other tags you nuked where correct please refrain from removing proper tags, hybrid is tagged for a reason.

1: I see no monitor lizard, I see two dragons. There aren't even ambient animals in the background to warrant the tag.

2: Maleherm has no application. I see a male on the bottom being anally probed and the intersex above him has full teats. Maleherm is not used for "a character who is a herm and uses male pronouns", it's for a herm who is primarily male in every aspect, but happens to also have a vagina. Breasts or full teats in this aspect make it a herm and not maleherm.

I see two dragons, each with hemipenes, and the top with tentacle-like hemipenes in particular. The top looks like a herm (pene, vagina, teats) while the bottom looks like a typical male. Both look like dragons.

I do not see hybrids, ovipositors, or a maleherm. Don't put these here.

Ratte said:
I see two dragons, each with hemipenes, and the top with tentacle-like hemipenes in particular. The top looks like a herm (pene, vagina, teats) while the bottom looks like a typical male. Both look like dragons.

I do not see hybrids, ovipositors, or a maleherm. Don't put these here.

a hemipenes that is also a ovipositor in that it has a tube/oriface between those cilia that can also lay eggs, there are many posts under the tag that do not show eggs being layed or any kind of action or opening for eggs trhat would indicate an ovipositor, non the less they are still tagged as ovipositor so why should mine actually showing action that would make it imminent incorrect? And maybe kolbolds should be aliased away sence you cant seem to tell the difference, all images under argent are tagged with kolbold and their are a good number of winged kobolds. And the top is very much is a maleherm because everything on the body points to the character being masculine, teats by your own tagging rules arnt regarded as (feminine)breasts. And again if your going strike down hybrid from my OC then you should do that with every single dragon as they seem to take on characteristics of any kind of animal naturally. to be clear the muzzle,tongue,claws and the fact that there is a hemipenes are all inspired by a komodo dragon

Daneasaur said:
1: I see no monitor lizard, I see two dragons. There aren't even ambient animals in the background to warrant the tag.

2: Maleherm has no application. I see a male on the bottom being anally probed and the intersex above him has full teats. Maleherm is not used for "a character who is a herm and uses male pronouns", it's for a herm who is primarily male in every aspect, but happens to also have a vagina. Breasts or full teats in this aspect make it a herm and not maleherm.

Daneasaur said:
1: I see no monitor lizard, I see two dragons. There aren't even ambient animals in the background to warrant the tag.

2: Maleherm has no application. I see a male on the bottom being anally probed and the intersex above him has full teats. Maleherm is not used for "a character who is a herm and uses male pronouns", it's for a herm who is primarily male in every aspect, but happens to also have a vagina. Breasts or full teats in this aspect make it a herm and not maleherm.

In all regards the top character is infact masculine thru, teats arnt regarded as breasts and as such under existing rules isnt a feminine trait that can be used when everything else clearly states a masculine form

and the problem with species i stated in the responce to ratte

Ruku said:
a hemipenes that is also a ovipositor in that it has a tube/oriface between those cilia that can also lay eggs, there are many posts under the tag that do not show eggs being layed or any kind of action or opening for eggs trhat would indicate an ovipositor, non the less they are still tagged as ovipositor so why should mine actually showing action that would make it imminent incorrect? And maybe kolbolds should be aliased away sence you cant seem to tell the difference, all images under argent are tagged with kolbold and their are a good number of winged kobolds. And the top is very much is a maleherm because everything on the body points to the character being masculine, teats by your own tagging rules arnt regarded as (feminine)breasts. And again if your going strike down hybrid from my OC then you should do that with every single dragon as they seem to take on characteristics of any kind of animal naturally. to be clear the muzzle,tongue,claws and the fact that there is a hemipenes are all inspired by a komodo dragon

Uh just looking at the first page of results for ovipositor I am seeing either the opening on the end of the abdomen or a tentacle/bodypart that is indeed ejecting eggs. If you can't tell what it is, it doesn't get tagged. Period. Regarding teats, I'm seeing a lot to the contrary.

Ratte said:
Uh just looking at the first page of results for ovipositor I am seeing either the opening on the end of the abdomen or a tentacle/bodypart that is indeed ejecting eggs. If you can't tell what it is, it doesn't get tagged. Period. Regarding teats, I'm seeing a lot to the contrary.

post #619083 post #785639 post #728342 post #679037 ... please do explain whats contrary to dabates on the subject that lasted months? please look closed at the end of the open hemipene, you can clearly see the tube i state below the cilia

Ruku said:

just stop

EightyNine said:
just stop

why should i not point out that a admin is incorrect under their own established rules of this website, and debate concerning the subjected tags?

Ruku said:
post #619083 post #785639 post #728342 post #679037 ... please do explain whats contrary to dabates on the subject that lasted months? please look closed at the end of the open hemipene, you can clearly see the tube i state below the cilia

First two should have it, the last two should not. If something just looks like a penis, it gets a penis and perhaps the unusual_penis tag or some derivative thereof. If something appears to be an ovipositor (the end of the farthest end from the body, such as a tail or the abdomen of an insect) and/or is performing something like egg-laying, then it gets the ovipositor tag. That's it. You're making this issue a lot bigger than it should have ever been.

And no, I can't "clearly see the tube i state below the cilia" because I don't want to look at this thing any longer than absolutely necessary and it is still not indicative of your desired purpose. That's life.

Ruku said:
why should i not point out that a admin is incorrect under their own established rules of this website, and debate concerning the subjected tags?

I'm not. You're mad because once again, someone's ruling isn't in your favor. Big surprise there.

Ratte said:
First two should have it, the last two should not.

wow so a snake penis with no evidence at all of activly transmitting eggs is a ovipositor while the 3rd that actually shows the penis as having a opening for the eggs is not, interresting.

If something appears to be an ovipositor (the end of the farthest end from the body, such as a tail or the abdomen of an insect) and/or is performing something like egg-laying, then it gets the ovipositor tag. That's it.

what do you think its preparing to do by probing and opening the anus? for reference post #937269

And no, I can't "clearly see the tube i state below the cilia" because I don't want to look at this thing any longer than absolutely necessary

interesting, i provide you with the proof but you dont wanna look because you feel disturbed while touting what you believe as fact without anything to back it up, if you cant do your the job that you applied for here then you have no place deciding here.

and it is still not indicative of your desired purpose. That's life.

its not whats desired, its whats visible and clearly you admitted your self that you dont wanna see the visible proof so how should you know whats visible. small things matter.

I'm not.

clearly you are since again you admit it your self that you dont wanna see the visible proof because you just dont feel like it.

You're mad because once again, someone's ruling isn't in your favor. Big surprise there.

somewhat iritated, yes
because a ruling is not in my favor, no
rather because a admin that does not want to admit that they are wrong.

Ruku said:
wow so a snake penis with no evidence at all of activly transmitting eggs is a ovipositor while the 3rd that actually shows the penis as having a opening for the eggs is not, interresting.

No, I am talking about the actual end on the tail you seem to be ignoring, not the penis.

Ruku said:
what do you think its preparing to do by probing and opening the anus? for reference post #937269

Tag what you see. I don't see eggs in this post and I'm not going to make assumptions. I don't care about what your linked post has, I care about what I see in this post. Don't confuse issues.

Ruku said:
interesting, i provide you with the proof but you dont wanna look because you feel disturbed while touting what you believe as fact without anything to back it up, if you cant do your the job that you applied for here then you have no place deciding here.

You are dangerously daft. You have given me no proof aside from "butbutbut look at all these other posts that I claim work with this one!" when that isn't how anything works here. I don't care if you like it or not. I'm not "disturbed" by it, I don't like porn and hate dealing with stupid tag wars over unwarranted bullheadedness like this. I have been here far, far longer than you. Don't tell me what I am and am not qualified for.

Ruku said:
its not whats desired, its whats visible and clearly you admitted your self that you dont wanna see the visible proof so how should you know whats visible. small things matter.

No, it's what's desired. You are the only one who can "see" these things because it is your character. You are tagging what you know which, as you should probably have figured out by now, is not how tagging works here.

Ruku said:
clearly you are since again you admit it your self that you dont wanna see the visible proof because you just dont feel like it.

Which is funny because I've looked at all these damn posts several times and my ruling is still the same. It always will be. Your opinion of it is your own problem.

Ruku said:
somewhat iritated, yes
because a ruling is not in my favor, no
rather because a admin that does not want to admit that they are wrong.

Because I'm not. You are. You don't like that a ruling is not in your favor because of other posts. That is the whole point of our tagging system. If it can't be seen and understood by common knowledge (ovipositors on insects), if it isn't actually happening (ovipositors on fictional species), it does not get tagged. That's it. Period. End of story.

Ruling is the same, keep it as I've stated. I have no problem issuing records for something that's devolved this far if you want to keep pushing the issue.

God damn the drama in this post is just bad, i can see why Ratte is a "former mod"