When should ear piercings or nose piercings be tagged furry-specific_piercing, if ever? There're ~4 pages of posts that do tag them as furry-specific_piercing (e.g. post #714213, post #921196) and ~375 that don't (e.g. post #923796, post #956112).

I saw a thread here discussing this, but I just wanted to make sure that info's current.

rezi said:
(e.g. post #714213, post #921196)

That second one does not contain a furry specific piercing. That's just an earring! In fact the furgonomics tag shouldn't be on there, as tha Pikachu doesn't have anything specially designed (at least shown in image) for her non-human body: She's just got a coat and an earring. The first one doesn't really seem to, either, as those are more just tail bands, which, while furry-specific jewelery, are not piercings.

Basically, if horns or a tail are pierced, or if there's, say, one of those nipple_chains that's hooked up to multi_breast, that would be furry-specific_piercing. A similar chain hooking up hemipenes would, too.

Furrin_Gok said:
The first one doesn't really seem to, either, as those are more just tail bands, which, while furry-specific jewelery, are not piercings.

More referring to the nose ring in that picture, but I still gotcha. I'll go ahead and clean up the simple earrings and nose rings as non-furry-specific. Thanks!

Edit: Same goes for furgonomics, since furry-specific_piercing implicates it